<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>MG Marketing &#187; access</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mg-mk.com/en/tag/access/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mg-mk.com/en</link>
	<description>Online Marketing Agency</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2026 22:10:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>SEO Smackdown Round 2: Old Vs. New Search Engine Optimization</title>
		<link>http://mg-mk.com/en/seo-smackdown-round-2-old-vs-new-search-engine-optimization/</link>
		<comments>http://mg-mk.com/en/seo-smackdown-round-2-old-vs-new-search-engine-optimization/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2013 14:08:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[access]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[labeling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[link development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[new seo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[old seo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search usability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[searcher behaviors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[validation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[website design]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mg-mk.com/en/seo-smackdown-round-2-old-vs-new-search-engine-optimization/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Has SEO really changed? Search engine algoholics might say "Yes!" Experienced practitioners might say, "Not really." Instead of keywords, site architecture, and link development, maybe we should understand aboutness, information scent, and validation. Please visit Search Engine Land for the full article]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Has SEO really changed? Search engine algoholics might say &#8220;Yes!&#8221; Experienced practitioners might say, &#8220;Not really.&#8221; Instead of keywords, site architecture, and link development, maybe we should understand aboutness, information scent, and validation. Please visit Search Engine Land for the full article</p>
<p>The rest is here:<br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://feeds.searchengineland.com/~r/searchengineland/~3/chmGHcenO9g/seo-smackdown-round-2-old-vs-new-search-engine-optimization-145825" title="SEO Smackdown Round 2: Old Vs. New Search Engine Optimization">SEO Smackdown Round 2: Old Vs. New Search Engine Optimization</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mg-mk.com/en/seo-smackdown-round-2-old-vs-new-search-engine-optimization/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
