<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>MG Marketing &#187; amazon seo</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mg-mk.com/en/tag/amazon-seo/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mg-mk.com/en</link>
	<description>Online Marketing Agency</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2026 22:10:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>4 Reasons Why Amazon and Facebook Are Gaining on Google by @hubshout11</title>
		<link>http://mg-mk.com/en/4-reasons-why-amazon-and-facebook-are-gaining-on-google-by-hubshout11/</link>
		<comments>http://mg-mk.com/en/4-reasons-why-amazon-and-facebook-are-gaining-on-google-by-hubshout11/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2014 13:41:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[amazon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[amazon seo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[facebook ads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google: adwords]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search engines]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mg-mk.com/en/4-reasons-why-amazon-and-facebook-are-gaining-on-google-by-hubshout11/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ In 1998, PC Magazine wrote: “Google! is a Stanford University project designed to find the most relevant Web pages (those with the most inbound links) and run searches against them. The 25 million pages currently catalogued seem to be good choices; the site has an uncanny knack for returning extremely relevant results.” Note the exclamation mark in that 1998-99 version of Google’s logo, which some say was added to mimic Yahoo’s logo. ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> In 1998, PC Magazine wrote: “Google! is a Stanford University project designed to find the most relevant Web pages (those with the most inbound links) and run searches against them. The 25 million pages currently catalogued seem to be good choices; the site has an uncanny knack for returning extremely relevant results.” Note the exclamation mark in that 1998-99 version of Google’s logo, which some say was added to mimic Yahoo’s logo. </p>
<p>Excerpt from:<br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/SearchEngineJournal/~3/0WjWxES_sqM/" title="4 Reasons Why Amazon and Facebook Are Gaining on Google by @hubshout11">4 Reasons Why Amazon and Facebook Are Gaining on Google by @hubshout11</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mg-mk.com/en/4-reasons-why-amazon-and-facebook-are-gaining-on-google-by-hubshout11/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>An SEO’s Advanced Guide to Top Rankings on Amazon by @fishinseo</title>
		<link>http://mg-mk.com/en/an-seo%e2%80%99s-advanced-guide-to-top-rankings-on-amazon-by-fishinseo/</link>
		<comments>http://mg-mk.com/en/an-seo%e2%80%99s-advanced-guide-to-top-rankings-on-amazon-by-fishinseo/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2014 11:29:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[amazon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[amazon seo]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mg-mk.com/en/an-seo%e2%80%99s-advanced-guide-to-top-rankings-on-amazon-by-fishinseo/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ Just like the nuances with Google’s search algorithms and the mystery surrounding certain elements of their multiple ranking factors, Amazon.com also has its little quirks when it comes to ranking. With so few people in the industry discussing the topic of Amazon ranking factors and algorithms, plus the misunderstood product fields, it is hard to get a real feel for what it takes to be successful organically within Amazon.com]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> Just like the nuances with Google’s search algorithms and the mystery surrounding certain elements of their multiple ranking factors, Amazon.com also has its little quirks when it comes to ranking. With so few people in the industry discussing the topic of Amazon ranking factors and algorithms, plus the misunderstood product fields, it is hard to get a real feel for what it takes to be successful organically within Amazon.com</p>
<p>Read more from the original source:<br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/SearchEngineJournal/~3/GKt9Sn8ur5s/" title="An SEO’s Advanced Guide to Top Rankings on Amazon by @fishinseo">An SEO’s Advanced Guide to Top Rankings on Amazon by @fishinseo</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mg-mk.com/en/an-seo%e2%80%99s-advanced-guide-to-top-rankings-on-amazon-by-fishinseo/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
