<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>MG Marketing &#187; aol</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mg-mk.com/en/tag/aol/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mg-mk.com/en</link>
	<description>Online Marketing Agency</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2026 18:01:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Report: Customer satisfaction with search drops, in social Google+ beats Facebook</title>
		<link>http://mg-mk.com/en/report-customer-satisfaction-with-search-drops-in-social-google-beats-facebook/</link>
		<comments>http://mg-mk.com/en/report-customer-satisfaction-with-search-drops-in-social-google-beats-facebook/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Jul 2017 14:40:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aol]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[channel: consumer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google: google+]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google: web search]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[twitter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[yahoo: search]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mg-mk.com/en/report-customer-satisfaction-with-search-drops-in-social-google-beats-facebook/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ACSI rankings are based on survey of nearly 5,000 US consumers. The post Report: Customer satisfaction with search drops, in social Google+ beats Facebook appeared first on Search Engine Land. Please visit Search Engine Land for the full article. ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ACSI rankings are based on survey of nearly 5,000 US consumers. The post Report: Customer satisfaction with search drops, in social Google+ beats Facebook appeared first on Search Engine Land. Please visit Search Engine Land for the full article. </p>
<p>See more here:<br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://feeds.searchengineland.com/~r/searchengineland/~3/eebMtbjAfJQ/report-customer-satisfaction-search-drops-google-beats-facebook-279826" title="Report: Customer satisfaction with search drops, in social Google+ beats Facebook">Report: Customer satisfaction with search drops, in social Google+ beats Facebook</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mg-mk.com/en/report-customer-satisfaction-with-search-drops-in-social-google-beats-facebook/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What are the top 10 most popular search engines?</title>
		<link>http://mg-mk.com/en/what-are-the-top-10-most-popular-search-engines/</link>
		<comments>http://mg-mk.com/en/what-are-the-top-10-most-popular-search-engines/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Aug 2016 17:07:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aol]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[duckduckgo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search engines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[yahoo]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mg-mk.com/en/what-are-the-top-10-most-popular-search-engines/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ You know, apart from the most obvious search engine. And possibly the second most obvious one too]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> You know, apart from the most obvious search engine. And possibly the second most obvious one too</p>
<p>Read the rest here:<br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://feeds.searchenginewatch.com/~r/sewblog/~3/IZftvV_F8_Y/" title="What are the top 10 most popular search engines?">What are the top 10 most popular search engines?</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mg-mk.com/en/what-are-the-top-10-most-popular-search-engines/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Verizon acquires Yahoo’s operating business for $4.8 billion</title>
		<link>http://mg-mk.com/en/verizon-acquires-yahoo%e2%80%99s-operating-business-for-4-8-billion/</link>
		<comments>http://mg-mk.com/en/verizon-acquires-yahoo%e2%80%99s-operating-business-for-4-8-billion/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jul 2016 13:30:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aol]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[industry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[more news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[verizon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[yahoo]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mg-mk.com/en/verizon-acquires-yahoo%e2%80%99s-operating-business-for-4-8-billion/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ Verizon has agreed to acquire Yahoo&#8217;s operating business in a $4.8 billion cash deal, sealing the fate of one of the internet&#8217;s pioneering giants. ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> Verizon has agreed to acquire Yahoo&#8217;s operating business in a $4.8 billion cash deal, sealing the fate of one of the internet&#8217;s pioneering giants. </p>
<p>See the rest here:<br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://feeds.searchenginewatch.com/~r/sewblog/~3/pgHOcHvtC3s/" title="Verizon acquires Yahoo’s operating business for $4.8 billion">Verizon acquires Yahoo’s operating business for $4.8 billion</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mg-mk.com/en/verizon-acquires-yahoo%e2%80%99s-operating-business-for-4-8-billion/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bing Now Powers AOL Search: What Advertisers Need To Know</title>
		<link>http://mg-mk.com/en/bing-now-powers-aol-search-what-advertisers-need-to-know/</link>
		<comments>http://mg-mk.com/en/bing-now-powers-aol-search-what-advertisers-need-to-know/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jan 2016 14:29:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aol]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bing ads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[channel: sem]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search ads]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mg-mk.com/en/bing-now-powers-aol-search-what-advertisers-need-to-know/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here's what's changing in Bing Ads with the addition of AOL to the network. The post Bing Now Powers AOL Search: What Advertisers Need To Know appeared first on Search Engine Land. Please visit Search Engine Land for the full article. ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#8217;s what&#8217;s changing in Bing Ads with the addition of AOL to the network. The post Bing Now Powers AOL Search: What Advertisers Need To Know appeared first on Search Engine Land. Please visit Search Engine Land for the full article. </p>
<p>Read more:<br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://feeds.searchengineland.com/~r/searchengineland/~3/53vgRWDWog4/bing-now-powers-aol-search-what-advertisers-need-to-know-239642" title="Bing Now Powers AOL Search: What Advertisers Need To Know">Bing Now Powers AOL Search: What Advertisers Need To Know</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mg-mk.com/en/bing-now-powers-aol-search-what-advertisers-need-to-know/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Virtually No Change In US Desktop Search Market Share According To ComScore’s May 2015 Report</title>
		<link>http://mg-mk.com/en/virtually-no-change-in-us-desktop-search-market-share-according-to-comscore%e2%80%99s-may-2015-report/</link>
		<comments>http://mg-mk.com/en/virtually-no-change-in-us-desktop-search-market-share-according-to-comscore%e2%80%99s-may-2015-report/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2015 22:54:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aol]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ask]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[channel: seo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google: business issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google: web search]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[yahoo]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mg-mk.com/en/virtually-no-change-in-us-desktop-search-market-share-according-to-comscore%e2%80%99s-may-2015-report/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Google still at 64%, while Bing holds on to the 20% share it reached in March. The post Virtually No Change In US Desktop Search Market Share According To ComScore&#8217;s May 2015 Report appeared first on Search Engine Land. ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google still at 64%, while Bing holds on to the 20% share it reached in March. The post Virtually No Change In US Desktop Search Market Share According To ComScore&#8217;s May 2015 Report appeared first on Search Engine Land. </p>
<p>More here:<br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://feeds.searchengineland.com/~r/searchengineland/~3/y7uumuukUqQ/virtually-no-change-in-us-desktop-search-market-share-according-to-comscores-may-2015-report-224204" title="Virtually No Change In US Desktop Search Market Share According To ComScore’s May 2015 Report">Virtually No Change In US Desktop Search Market Share According To ComScore’s May 2015 Report</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mg-mk.com/en/virtually-no-change-in-us-desktop-search-market-share-according-to-comscore%e2%80%99s-may-2015-report/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Microsoft Signs 10-Year Deal For AOL To Use Bing’s Ads &amp; Listings</title>
		<link>http://mg-mk.com/en/microsoft-signs-10-year-deal-for-aol-to-use-bing%e2%80%99s-ads-listings/</link>
		<comments>http://mg-mk.com/en/microsoft-signs-10-year-deal-for-aol-to-use-bing%e2%80%99s-ads-listings/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2015 22:06:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aol]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bing ads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[channel: industry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google: business issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[top news]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mg-mk.com/en/microsoft-signs-10-year-deal-for-aol-to-use-bing%e2%80%99s-ads-listings/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Google loses deal it held since 2002, but AOL matters far less than it once did. The post Microsoft Signs 10-Year Deal For AOL To Use Bing&#8217;s Ads &#038; Listings appeared first on Search Engine Land. Please visit Search Engine Land for the full article. ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google loses deal it held since 2002, but AOL matters far less than it once did. The post Microsoft Signs 10-Year Deal For AOL To Use Bing&#8217;s Ads &#038; Listings appeared first on Search Engine Land. Please visit Search Engine Land for the full article. </p>
<p>Go here to read the rest:<br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://feeds.searchengineland.com/~r/searchengineland/~3/6S6HMrBwQXQ/microsoft-signs-10-year-deal-for-aol-to-use-bings-ads-listings-224190" title="Microsoft Signs 10-Year Deal For AOL To Use Bing’s Ads &amp; Listings">Microsoft Signs 10-Year Deal For AOL To Use Bing’s Ads &amp; Listings</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mg-mk.com/en/microsoft-signs-10-year-deal-for-aol-to-use-bing%e2%80%99s-ads-listings/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Report: Brands May Lose 10K to 60K Visitors Per Month To PPC Trademark Bidding</title>
		<link>http://mg-mk.com/en/report-brands-may-lose-10k-to-60k-visitors-per-month-to-ppc-trademark-bidding/</link>
		<comments>http://mg-mk.com/en/report-brands-may-lose-10k-to-60k-visitors-per-month-to-ppc-trademark-bidding/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2015 17:54:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aol]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bing ads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[channel: sem]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google: adwords]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search ads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search ads: general]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[top news]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mg-mk.com/en/report-brands-may-lose-10k-to-60k-visitors-per-month-to-ppc-trademark-bidding/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Brand Verity's Q4 study looks at trademark usage in paid search across 10 industry verticals. The post Report: Brands May Lose 10K to 60K Visitors Per Month To PPC Trademark Bidding appeared first on Search Engine Land. Please visit Search Engine Land for the full article. ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Brand Verity&#8217;s Q4 study looks at trademark usage in paid search across 10 industry verticals. The post Report: Brands May Lose 10K to 60K Visitors Per Month To PPC Trademark Bidding appeared first on Search Engine Land. Please visit Search Engine Land for the full article. </p>
<p>More:<br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://feeds.searchengineland.com/~r/searchengineland/~3/c6uz8z3EK3I/report-brands-may-lose-10k-60k-visitors-per-month-ppc-trademark-bidding-215981" title="Report: Brands May Lose 10K to 60K Visitors Per Month To PPC Trademark Bidding">Report: Brands May Lose 10K to 60K Visitors Per Month To PPC Trademark Bidding</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mg-mk.com/en/report-brands-may-lose-10k-to-60k-visitors-per-month-to-ppc-trademark-bidding/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Search Arbitrage Accounts For Largest Percentage Of Ads Competing On Brand Trademarks</title>
		<link>http://mg-mk.com/en/search-arbitrage-accounts-for-largest-percentage-of-ads-competing-on-brand-trademarks/</link>
		<comments>http://mg-mk.com/en/search-arbitrage-accounts-for-largest-percentage-of-ads-competing-on-brand-trademarks/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Nov 2014 14:33:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aol]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[channel: sem]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google: adwords]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microsoft: bing ads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search ads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search ads: general]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[yahoo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[yahoo: search ads]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mg-mk.com/en/search-arbitrage-accounts-for-largest-percentage-of-ads-competing-on-brand-trademarks/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Brands are often struggling with other advertisers encroaching on their trademark terms in search ads. Sometimes brand trademarks are used by &#8220;friendly&#8221; advertisers such as resellers, but a study released today from BrandVerity shows that search arbitrage accounts for the majority of... ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Brands are often struggling with other advertisers encroaching on their trademark terms in search ads. Sometimes brand trademarks are used by &#8220;friendly&#8221; advertisers such as resellers, but a study released today from BrandVerity shows that search arbitrage accounts for the majority of&#8230; </p>
<p>View post:<br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://feeds.searchengineland.com/~r/searchengineland/~3/g2apKf8SrT4/search-arbitrage-accounts-largest-percentage-ads-competing-brand-trademarks-207826" title="Search Arbitrage Accounts For Largest Percentage Of Ads Competing On Brand Trademarks">Search Arbitrage Accounts For Largest Percentage Of Ads Competing On Brand Trademarks</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mg-mk.com/en/search-arbitrage-accounts-for-largest-percentage-of-ads-competing-on-brand-trademarks/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>MapQuest Aims For Reboot With New Content, Partners, UI</title>
		<link>http://mg-mk.com/en/mapquest-aims-for-reboot-with-new-content-partners-ui/</link>
		<comments>http://mg-mk.com/en/mapquest-aims-for-reboot-with-new-content-partners-ui/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Apr 2014 15:43:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aol]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aol: local]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aol: mapquest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aol: mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[channel: local]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mapquest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[top news]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mg-mk.com/en/mapquest-aims-for-reboot-with-new-content-partners-ui/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A few years ago, while others were investing in their mapping platforms, AOL was coasting with MapQuest. AOL&#8217;s sustained neglect of the online mapping pioneer cost the site its leadership in digital maps. ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A few years ago, while others were investing in their mapping platforms, AOL was coasting with MapQuest. AOL&#8217;s sustained neglect of the online mapping pioneer cost the site its leadership in digital maps. </p>
<p>See more here:<br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://feeds.searchengineland.com/~r/searchengineland/~3/tXYFkInYCuc/mapquest-reboot-new-content-partners-ui-188706" title="MapQuest Aims For Reboot With New Content, Partners, UI">MapQuest Aims For Reboot With New Content, Partners, UI</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mg-mk.com/en/mapquest-aims-for-reboot-with-new-content-partners-ui/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>MapQuest Transfers Local Listings Management To Yext</title>
		<link>http://mg-mk.com/en/mapquest-transfers-local-listings-management-to-yext/</link>
		<comments>http://mg-mk.com/en/mapquest-transfers-local-listings-management-to-yext/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jan 2014 17:57:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aol]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aol: local]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aol: mapquest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[channel: local]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mg-mk.com/en/mapquest-transfers-local-listings-management-to-yext/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Last October MapQuest started outsourcing local business listings management to Yext. The &#8220;claim your MapQuest listings&#8221; page is hosted by Yext (I believe) with a co-branded look and feel. Yesterday MapQuest notified business users that its local business center and basic local listings... ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Last October MapQuest started outsourcing local business listings management to Yext. The &#8220;claim your MapQuest listings&#8221; page is hosted by Yext (I believe) with a co-branded look and feel. Yesterday MapQuest notified business users that its local business center and basic local listings&#8230; </p>
<p>Read the rest here:<br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://feeds.searchengineland.com/~r/searchengineland/~3/0Wy759wVK3c/mapquest-transfers-listings-management-to-yext-182457" title="MapQuest Transfers Local Listings Management To Yext">MapQuest Transfers Local Listings Management To Yext</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mg-mk.com/en/mapquest-transfers-local-listings-management-to-yext/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
