<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>MG Marketing &#187; content migration</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mg-mk.com/en/tag/content-migration/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mg-mk.com/en</link>
	<description>Online Marketing Agency</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2026 13:30:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Is a brutal approach to content migration best for SEO?</title>
		<link>http://mg-mk.com/en/is-a-brutal-approach-to-content-migration-best-for-seo/</link>
		<comments>http://mg-mk.com/en/is-a-brutal-approach-to-content-migration-best-for-seo/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Mar 2016 10:48:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[content]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[content migration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[content planning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[more news]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mg-mk.com/en/is-a-brutal-approach-to-content-migration-best-for-seo/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ I read a great article over at Boagworld about the pain of content migration, a term that will send shivers down the spine of anybody unfortunate enough to have been through such a process. Written by Paul Boag, it explains some of the common problems with migrating vast amounts of content . Notably, the reorganising of content in a way where lots of mismatches occur, breaking navigation and links, ending up with wonky URL structures and – as a result &#8211; lots of frustrated users and too many 404 pages being shown. ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> I read a great article over at Boagworld about the pain of content migration, a term that will send shivers down the spine of anybody unfortunate enough to have been through such a process. Written by Paul Boag, it explains some of the common problems with migrating vast amounts of content . Notably, the reorganising of content in a way where lots of mismatches occur, breaking navigation and links, ending up with wonky URL structures and – as a result &#8211; lots of frustrated users and too many 404 pages being shown. </p>
<p>Go here to read the rest:<br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://feeds.searchenginewatch.com/~r/sewblog/~3/RB_8bt04cpA/" title="Is a brutal approach to content migration best for SEO?">Is a brutal approach to content migration best for SEO?</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mg-mk.com/en/is-a-brutal-approach-to-content-migration-best-for-seo/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
