<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>MG Marketing &#187; eric schmidt</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mg-mk.com/en/tag/eric-schmidt/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mg-mk.com/en</link>
	<description>Online Marketing Agency</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2026 10:52:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Is Chasing AuthorRank A Waste Of Time For SEOs?</title>
		<link>http://mg-mk.com/en/is-chasing-authorrank-a-waste-of-time-for-seos/</link>
		<comments>http://mg-mk.com/en/is-chasing-authorrank-a-waste-of-time-for-seos/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Mar 2014 14:50:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[all things seo column]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[authorrank]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[authorship tag]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[channel: seo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[eric schmidt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google authorship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google plus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google ranking factors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google serps]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[in-depth articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rel=author tagging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the new digital age]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mg-mk.com/en/is-chasing-authorrank-a-waste-of-time-for-seos/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On June 7, 2011, Google announced support for a new type of markup called the Authorship Tag. This was the rel=&#8221;author&#8221; tag]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On June 7, 2011, Google announced support for a new type of markup called the Authorship Tag. This was the rel=&#8221;author&#8221; tag</p>
<p>See the original post:<br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://feeds.searchengineland.com/~r/searchengineland/~3/jHDjIQjUmUU/chasing-authorrank-waste-time-185140" title="Is Chasing AuthorRank A Waste Of Time For SEOs?">Is Chasing AuthorRank A Waste Of Time For SEOs?</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mg-mk.com/en/is-chasing-authorrank-a-waste-of-time-for-seos/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google’s Schmidt: Hollywood Should Take Content Pirates To Court</title>
		<link>http://mg-mk.com/en/google%e2%80%99s-schmidt-hollywood-should-take-content-pirates-to-court/</link>
		<comments>http://mg-mk.com/en/google%e2%80%99s-schmidt-hollywood-should-take-content-pirates-to-court/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jul 2013 19:02:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[channel: industry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dmca]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[eric schmidt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google: legal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google: pirate update]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hollywood piracy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal: copyright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[piracy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[top news]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mg-mk.com/en/google%e2%80%99s-schmidt-hollywood-should-take-content-pirates-to-court/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Google&#8217;s Eric Schmidt says that the entertainment industry should focus on taking content pirates to court, rather than just trying to get Google (and other search engines) to remove pirate sites from search results. His comments, reported by Variety, came yesterday during an impromptu chat... ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google&#8217;s Eric Schmidt says that the entertainment industry should focus on taking content pirates to court, rather than just trying to get Google (and other search engines) to remove pirate sites from search results. His comments, reported by Variety, came yesterday during an impromptu chat&#8230; </p>
<p>Read the original:<br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://feeds.searchengineland.com/~r/searchengineland/~3/0ektftH0EAQ/googles-schmidt-hollywood-should-take-content-pirates-to-court-166694" title="Google’s Schmidt: Hollywood Should Take Content Pirates To Court">Google’s Schmidt: Hollywood Should Take Content Pirates To Court</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mg-mk.com/en/google%e2%80%99s-schmidt-hollywood-should-take-content-pirates-to-court/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Author Rank, Authorship, Search Rankings &amp; That Eric Schmidt Book Quote</title>
		<link>http://mg-mk.com/en/author-rank-authorship-search-rankings-that-eric-schmidt-book-quote/</link>
		<comments>http://mg-mk.com/en/author-rank-authorship-search-rankings-that-eric-schmidt-book-quote/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Mar 2013 17:44:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[author rank]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[authorship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[eric schmidt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[features: analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google authorship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google: google+]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google: rich snippets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google: seo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[top news]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mg-mk.com/en/author-rank-authorship-search-rankings-that-eric-schmidt-book-quote/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Last month, an excerpt from Eric Schmidt&#8217;s forthcoming book came out where he discussed how identity and authorship might be used to better rank search results. Since then, I&#8217;ve seen that widely cited as proof Google is already doing &#8220;Author Rank.&#8221; It&#8217;s not, nor was... Please visit Search Engine Land for the full article]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Last month, an excerpt from Eric Schmidt&#8217;s forthcoming book came out where he discussed how identity and authorship might be used to better rank search results. Since then, I&#8217;ve seen that widely cited as proof Google is already doing &#8220;Author Rank.&#8221; It&#8217;s not, nor was&#8230; Please visit Search Engine Land for the full article</p>
<p>Read the rest here:<br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://feeds.searchengineland.com/~r/searchengineland/~3/cKpkucEhyAU/author-rank-authorship-rankings-that-eric-schmidt-book-quote-153253" title="Author Rank, Authorship, Search Rankings &amp; That Eric Schmidt Book Quote">Author Rank, Authorship, Search Rankings &amp; That Eric Schmidt Book Quote</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mg-mk.com/en/author-rank-authorship-search-rankings-that-eric-schmidt-book-quote/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google Settles With France: No ‘Link Tax,’ But €60 Million Media Fund</title>
		<link>http://mg-mk.com/en/google-settles-with-france-no-%e2%80%98link-tax%e2%80%99-but-e60-million-media-fund/</link>
		<comments>http://mg-mk.com/en/google-settles-with-france-no-%e2%80%98link-tax%e2%80%99-but-e60-million-media-fund/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2013 19:59:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[eric schmidt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[france]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[francois hollande]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[french media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[french press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google: business issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google: critics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google: legal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google: news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google: outside us]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal: regulation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[settlement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[top news]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mg-mk.com/en/google-settles-with-france-no-%e2%80%98link-tax%e2%80%99-but-e60-million-media-fund/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Google has avoided getting hit with a &#8220;link tax&#8221; in France by agreeing to create a €60 million &#8220;Digital Publishing Innovation Fund&#8221; to essentially help French media adapt to the online age. The settlement, announced today in France by President Francois Hollande and... ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google has avoided getting hit with a &#8220;link tax&#8221; in France by agreeing to create a €60 million &#8220;Digital Publishing Innovation Fund&#8221; to essentially help French media adapt to the online age. The settlement, announced today in France by President Francois Hollande and&#8230; </p>
<p>Original post:<br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://feeds.searchengineland.com/~r/searchengineland/~3/nN_XUqwqu3M/google-settles-with-france-no-link-tax-but-e60-million-media-fund-147144" title="Google Settles With France: No ‘Link Tax,’ But €60 Million Media Fund">Google Settles With France: No ‘Link Tax,’ But €60 Million Media Fund</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mg-mk.com/en/google-settles-with-france-no-%e2%80%98link-tax%e2%80%99-but-e60-million-media-fund/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
