<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>MG Marketing &#187; ftc</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mg-mk.com/en/tag/ftc/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mg-mk.com/en</link>
	<description>Online Marketing Agency</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2026 22:10:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>FTC Updates Search Engine Ad Disclosure Guildelines After “Decline In Compliance”</title>
		<link>http://mg-mk.com/en/ftc-updates-search-engine-ad-disclosure-guildelines-after-%e2%80%9cdecline-in-compliance%e2%80%9d/</link>
		<comments>http://mg-mk.com/en/ftc-updates-search-engine-ad-disclosure-guildelines-after-%e2%80%9cdecline-in-compliance%e2%80%9d/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Jun 2013 17:27:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[channel: consumer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[disclosure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ftc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal: regulation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search engines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[top news]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mg-mk.com/en/ftc-updates-search-engine-ad-disclosure-guildelines-after-%e2%80%9cdecline-in-compliance%e2%80%9d/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In 2002, the US Federal Trade Commission issued landmark guidelines to search engines, to ensure they were make a clear distinction between their paid and unpaid listings. Now, the FTC has updated those guidelines, saying it has seen a &#8220;decline in compliance&#8221; since they were first... ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In 2002, the US Federal Trade Commission issued landmark guidelines to search engines, to ensure they were make a clear distinction between their paid and unpaid listings. Now, the FTC has updated those guidelines, saying it has seen a &#8220;decline in compliance&#8221; since they were first&#8230; </p>
<p>Go here to see the original:<br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://feeds.searchengineland.com/~r/searchengineland/~3/n13wZrUfxJs/ftc-search-engine-disclosure-164722" title="FTC Updates Search Engine Ad Disclosure Guildelines After “Decline In Compliance”">FTC Updates Search Engine Ad Disclosure Guildelines After “Decline In Compliance”</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mg-mk.com/en/ftc-updates-search-engine-ad-disclosure-guildelines-after-%e2%80%9cdecline-in-compliance%e2%80%9d/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Microsoft “Research” Discovers The Obvious In Renewed Anti-Trust Attack On Google</title>
		<link>http://mg-mk.com/en/microsoft-%e2%80%9cresearch%e2%80%9d-discovers-the-obvious-in-renewed-anti-trust-attack-on-google/</link>
		<comments>http://mg-mk.com/en/microsoft-%e2%80%9cresearch%e2%80%9d-discovers-the-obvious-in-renewed-anti-trust-attack-on-google/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Mar 2013 15:55:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[anti-trust]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[antitrust]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ftc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google: antitrust]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google: critics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[top news]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mg-mk.com/en/microsoft-%e2%80%9cresearch%e2%80%9d-discovers-the-obvious-in-renewed-anti-trust-attack-on-google/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Did you know that the higher a site is listed in search results, the more traffic that site is likely to receive? If you&#8217;re a search marketer, or anyone with a dose of common sense, you do. But Microsoft had research conducted to yet again prove this point, in an attempt to influence the..]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Did you know that the higher a site is listed in search results, the more traffic that site is likely to receive? If you&#8217;re a search marketer, or anyone with a dose of common sense, you do. But Microsoft had research conducted to yet again prove this point, in an attempt to influence the..</p>
<p>Go here to see the original:<br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://feeds.searchengineland.com/~r/searchengineland/~3/tr5X0b3m7FI/microsoft-research-renewed-anti-trust-attack-on-google-153077" title="Microsoft “Research” Discovers The Obvious In Renewed Anti-Trust Attack On Google">Microsoft “Research” Discovers The Obvious In Renewed Anti-Trust Attack On Google</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mg-mk.com/en/microsoft-%e2%80%9cresearch%e2%80%9d-discovers-the-obvious-in-renewed-anti-trust-attack-on-google/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Report: Google To Settle “WiSpy” Investigation With Attorneys General For Measly $7 Million</title>
		<link>http://mg-mk.com/en/report-google-to-settle-%e2%80%9cwispy%e2%80%9d-investigation-with-attorneys-general-for-measly-7-million/</link>
		<comments>http://mg-mk.com/en/report-google-to-settle-%e2%80%9cwispy%e2%80%9d-investigation-with-attorneys-general-for-measly-7-million/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Mar 2013 21:17:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ftc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google: business issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google: i/o]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google: legal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google: mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google: spyview]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google: street view]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal: privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[state attorney generals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[top news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wispy investigation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mg-mk.com/en/report-google-to-settle-%e2%80%9cwispy%e2%80%9d-investigation-with-attorneys-general-for-measly-7-million/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[According to AllThingsD, Google is about to settle the so-called &#8220;WiSpy&#8221; investigation with 30 US state Attorneys Generals. Google will admit no wrongdoing and pay $7 million according to the report. The article says the settlement will be announced next week. ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>According to AllThingsD, Google is about to settle the so-called &#8220;WiSpy&#8221; investigation with 30 US state Attorneys Generals. Google will admit no wrongdoing and pay $7 million according to the report. The article says the settlement will be announced next week. </p>
<p>Link:<br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://feeds.searchengineland.com/~r/searchengineland/~3/0rMfOp_FKUo/report-google-to-settle-wispy-investigation-with-attorneys-general-for-measly-7-million-151012" title="Report: Google To Settle “WiSpy” Investigation With Attorneys General For Measly $7 Million">Report: Google To Settle “WiSpy” Investigation With Attorneys General For Measly $7 Million</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mg-mk.com/en/report-google-to-settle-%e2%80%9cwispy%e2%80%9d-investigation-with-attorneys-general-for-measly-7-million/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>EU Antitrust Chief: Google “Diverting Traffic” &amp; Will Be Forced To Change</title>
		<link>http://mg-mk.com/en/eu-antitrust-chief-google-%e2%80%9cdiverting-traffic%e2%80%9d-will-be-forced-to-change/</link>
		<comments>http://mg-mk.com/en/eu-antitrust-chief-google-%e2%80%9cdiverting-traffic%e2%80%9d-will-be-forced-to-change/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2013 18:12:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[alumnia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[antitrust]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[european union]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[federal trade commission]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ftc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google: antitrust]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[top news]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mg-mk.com/en/eu-antitrust-chief-google-%e2%80%9cdiverting-traffic%e2%80%9d-will-be-forced-to-change/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[While saying he&#8217;s &#8220;still investigating,&#8221; the head of the European Union&#8217;s antitrust regulatory body has told the Financial Times that he&#8217;s convinced Google is &#8220;diverting traffic&#8221; and that it will be forced to change its results. From the FT interview: “We... Please visit Search Engine Land for the full article]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While saying he&#8217;s &#8220;still investigating,&#8221; the head of the European Union&#8217;s antitrust regulatory body has told the Financial Times that he&#8217;s convinced Google is &#8220;diverting traffic&#8221; and that it will be forced to change its results. From the FT interview: “We&#8230; Please visit Search Engine Land for the full article</p>
<p>Read the original post:<br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://feeds.searchengineland.com/~r/searchengineland/~3/D95oFDT-468/eu-antitrust-chief-google-diverting-traffic-will-be-forced-to-change-144824" title="EU Antitrust Chief: Google “Diverting Traffic” &amp; Will Be Forced To Change">EU Antitrust Chief: Google “Diverting Traffic” &amp; Will Be Forced To Change</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mg-mk.com/en/eu-antitrust-chief-google-%e2%80%9cdiverting-traffic%e2%80%9d-will-be-forced-to-change/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>FTC and Google Close To Reaching Patent Case Settlement</title>
		<link>http://mg-mk.com/en/ftc-and-google-close-to-reaching-patent-case-settlement/</link>
		<comments>http://mg-mk.com/en/ftc-and-google-close-to-reaching-patent-case-settlement/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2012 09:41:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[anti-trust]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[antitrust]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ftc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[patent dispute]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search bias]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mg-mk.com/en/ftc-and-google-close-to-reaching-patent-case-settlement/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ It’s being reported that Google is close to reaching a settlement with the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) regarding its long running anti-trust investigation. The post FTC and Google Close To Reaching Patent Case Settlement appeared first on Search Engine Journal ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> It’s being reported that Google is close to reaching a settlement with the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) regarding its long running anti-trust investigation. The post FTC and Google Close To Reaching Patent Case Settlement appeared first on Search Engine Journal </p>
<p>More:<br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/SearchEngineJournal/~3/b4MMk6SOfn4/" title="FTC and Google Close To Reaching Patent Case Settlement">FTC and Google Close To Reaching Patent Case Settlement</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mg-mk.com/en/ftc-and-google-close-to-reaching-patent-case-settlement/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>FTC Views Mobile Apps Lacking in Child Friendliness</title>
		<link>http://mg-mk.com/en/ftc-views-mobile-apps-lacking-in-child-friendliness/</link>
		<comments>http://mg-mk.com/en/ftc-views-mobile-apps-lacking-in-child-friendliness/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2012 16:25:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[child privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[child web]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[children's rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[free web]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ftc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[kid privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[regulators]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[web privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[web security]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mg-mk.com/en/ftc-views-mobile-apps-lacking-in-child-friendliness/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ A report from the FTC released this month, &#8220;Mobile Apps for Kids: Disclosures Still Not Making the Grade&#8221;, tells of what may be questionable practices. The report is an addendum to a previous agency study that showed lacking disclosure info for parents to protect their kids from possible negatives. Back in February Federal Trade Commission (FTC) staff The post FTC Views Mobile Apps Lacking in Child Friendliness appeared first on Search Engine Journal ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> A report from the FTC released this month, &#8220;Mobile Apps for Kids: Disclosures Still Not Making the Grade&#8221;, tells of what may be questionable practices. The report is an addendum to a previous agency study that showed lacking disclosure info for parents to protect their kids from possible negatives. Back in February Federal Trade Commission (FTC) staff The post FTC Views Mobile Apps Lacking in Child Friendliness appeared first on Search Engine Journal </p>
<p>Continued here:<br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/SearchEngineJournal/~3/mrhc5K9-FmU/" title="FTC Views Mobile Apps Lacking in Child Friendliness">FTC Views Mobile Apps Lacking in Child Friendliness</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mg-mk.com/en/ftc-views-mobile-apps-lacking-in-child-friendliness/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bing Shopping As A Poster Child For Consumer Confusion About Ads</title>
		<link>http://mg-mk.com/en/bing-shopping-as-a-poster-child-for-consumer-confusion-about-ads/</link>
		<comments>http://mg-mk.com/en/bing-shopping-as-a-poster-child-for-consumer-confusion-about-ads/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Dec 2012 14:00:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bing shopping]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ftc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google: product search]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal: regulation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[paid inclusion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scroogle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scroogled]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[top news]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mg-mk.com/en/bing-shopping-as-a-poster-child-for-consumer-confusion-about-ads/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Bing has been escalating its attacks against Google Shopping over consumer transparency since launching its &#8220;Scroogled&#8221; campaign just over a week ago. Well, consumer confusion is a serious issue. Indeed, Bing itself can be used to illustrate some of the problems consumers face at both..]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bing has been escalating its attacks against Google Shopping over consumer transparency since launching its &#8220;Scroogled&#8221; campaign just over a week ago. Well, consumer confusion is a serious issue. Indeed, Bing itself can be used to illustrate some of the problems consumers face at both..</p>
<p>See original here:<br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://feeds.searchengineland.com/~r/searchengineland/~3/ggWgjxbdTVA/bing-shopping-consumer-confusion-ads-141764" title="Bing Shopping As A Poster Child For Consumer Confusion About Ads">Bing Shopping As A Poster Child For Consumer Confusion About Ads</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mg-mk.com/en/bing-shopping-as-a-poster-child-for-consumer-confusion-about-ads/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Any Google Search Bias Just Won’t Fly Over Europe</title>
		<link>http://mg-mk.com/en/any-google-search-bias-just-won%e2%80%99t-fly-over-europe/</link>
		<comments>http://mg-mk.com/en/any-google-search-bias-just-won%e2%80%99t-fly-over-europe/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Dec 2012 11:58:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[doj]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[european commission]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ftc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google manifesto]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google-search]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[joaquin almunia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search bias]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mg-mk.com/en/any-google-search-bias-just-won%e2%80%99t-fly-over-europe/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ The FTC&#8221;s Jonathan Leibowitz is taking home what seems a clear message to the USA from his European counterpart, Joaquin Almunia; &#8220;Search bias just won&#8217;t fly over Europe.&#8221; On Monday FTC Chairman Jon Leibowitz met with European Commission (EC) competition commissioner Joaquin Almunia (at left) to discuss issues complaints search giant Google has wrongly leveraged their dominant search position in The post Any Google Search Bias Just Won&#8217;t Fly Over Europe appeared first on Search Engine Journal . ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> The FTC&#8221;s Jonathan Leibowitz is taking home what seems a clear message to the USA from his European counterpart, Joaquin Almunia; &#8220;Search bias just won&#8217;t fly over Europe.&#8221; On Monday FTC Chairman Jon Leibowitz met with European Commission (EC) competition commissioner Joaquin Almunia (at left) to discuss issues complaints search giant Google has wrongly leveraged their dominant search position in The post Any Google Search Bias Just Won&#8217;t Fly Over Europe appeared first on Search Engine Journal . </p>
<p>Read the original here:<br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/SearchEngineJournal/~3/6blCgATheb0/" title="Any Google Search Bias Just Won’t Fly Over Europe">Any Google Search Bias Just Won’t Fly Over Europe</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mg-mk.com/en/any-google-search-bias-just-won%e2%80%99t-fly-over-europe/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google “Defend Your Net” Campaign in Germany Heats Up</title>
		<link>http://mg-mk.com/en/google-%e2%80%9cdefend-your-net%e2%80%9d-campaign-in-germany-heats-up/</link>
		<comments>http://mg-mk.com/en/google-%e2%80%9cdefend-your-net%e2%80%9d-campaign-in-germany-heats-up/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2012 10:28:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[eu commission]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[europe internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ftc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google europe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet regulations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[regulators]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mg-mk.com/en/google-%e2%80%9cdefend-your-net%e2%80%9d-campaign-in-germany-heats-up/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ The Federal Association of German Newspaper Publishers Association (BDZV) asked the ruling coalition in the country, the CDU, to draft a law that will require content aggregators to pay publishers for indexing headlines and snippets. To support the BDZV, the German Federal Ministry of Justice (Bundesjustizministerium) drafted the Leistungsschutzrecht für Presseverlag, widely known in the The post Google &#8220;Defend Your Net&#8221; Campaign in Germany Heats Up appeared first on Search Engine Journal . ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> The Federal Association of German Newspaper Publishers Association (BDZV) asked the ruling coalition in the country, the CDU, to draft a law that will require content aggregators to pay publishers for indexing headlines and snippets. To support the BDZV, the German Federal Ministry of Justice (Bundesjustizministerium) drafted the Leistungsschutzrecht für Presseverlag, widely known in the The post Google &#8220;Defend Your Net&#8221; Campaign in Germany Heats Up appeared first on Search Engine Journal . </p>
<p>View post:<br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/SearchEngineJournal/~3/nEDGE3dzLd8/" title="Google “Defend Your Net” Campaign in Germany Heats Up">Google “Defend Your Net” Campaign in Germany Heats Up</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mg-mk.com/en/google-%e2%80%9cdefend-your-net%e2%80%9d-campaign-in-germany-heats-up/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Has Google Done a “Matrix” Bullet Dodge On the FTC?</title>
		<link>http://mg-mk.com/en/has-google-done-a-%e2%80%9cmatrix%e2%80%9d-bullet-dodge-on-the-ftc/</link>
		<comments>http://mg-mk.com/en/has-google-done-a-%e2%80%9cmatrix%e2%80%9d-bullet-dodge-on-the-ftc/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Nov 2012 15:43:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[danny sullivan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[eu commission]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fairness]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ftc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet regulation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search fairness]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mg-mk.com/en/has-google-done-a-%e2%80%9cmatrix%e2%80%9d-bullet-dodge-on-the-ftc/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ If the reports are true, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) may not have the ammunition to proceed with an anti-trust case versus Google. ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> If the reports are true, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) may not have the ammunition to proceed with an anti-trust case versus Google. </p>
<p>Read the rest here:<br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/SearchEngineJournal/~3/MbkyLTkertA/" title="Has Google Done a “Matrix” Bullet Dodge On the FTC?">Has Google Done a “Matrix” Bullet Dodge On the FTC?</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mg-mk.com/en/has-google-done-a-%e2%80%9cmatrix%e2%80%9d-bullet-dodge-on-the-ftc/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
