<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>MG Marketing &#187; google: critics</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mg-mk.com/en/tag/google-critics/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mg-mk.com/en</link>
	<description>Online Marketing Agency</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 Apr 2026 12:00:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Google involved in Supreme Court case that may change class-action damages awards</title>
		<link>http://mg-mk.com/en/google-involved-in-supreme-court-case-that-may-change-class-action-damages-awards/</link>
		<comments>http://mg-mk.com/en/google-involved-in-supreme-court-case-that-may-change-class-action-damages-awards/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 May 2018 13:13:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[alphabet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[channel: seo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google: critics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google: legal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google: web search]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal: general]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal: privacy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mg-mk.com/en/google-involved-in-supreme-court-case-that-may-change-class-action-damages-awards/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The question before the court involves 'cy-près' and whether it was OK for plaintiffs' attorneys to allocate settlement money to their own law schools. The post Google involved in Supreme Court case that may change class-action damages awards appeared first on Search Engine Land]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The question before the court involves &#8216;cy-près&#8217; and whether it was OK for plaintiffs&#8217; attorneys to allocate settlement money to their own law schools. The post Google involved in Supreme Court case that may change class-action damages awards appeared first on Search Engine Land</p>
<p>Read this article:<br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://feeds.searchengineland.com/~r/searchengineland/~3/QI8Xctn80BE/google-involved-in-supreme-court-case-that-may-change-class-action-damages-awards-297232" title="Google involved in Supreme Court case that may change class-action damages awards">Google involved in Supreme Court case that may change class-action damages awards</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mg-mk.com/en/google-involved-in-supreme-court-case-that-may-change-class-action-damages-awards/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google loses ‘right to be forgotten’ case in UK High Court</title>
		<link>http://mg-mk.com/en/google-loses-%e2%80%98right-to-be-forgotten%e2%80%99-case-in-uk-high-court/</link>
		<comments>http://mg-mk.com/en/google-loses-%e2%80%98right-to-be-forgotten%e2%80%99-case-in-uk-high-court/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Apr 2018 16:53:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google: critics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google: legal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google: outside us]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal: privacy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mg-mk.com/en/google-loses-%e2%80%98right-to-be-forgotten%e2%80%99-case-in-uk-high-court/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Decision likely to spark other appeals to courts by those denied de-listing. The post Google loses &#8216;right to be forgotten&#8217; case in UK High Court appeared first on Search Engine Land. Please visit Search Engine Land for the full article. ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Decision likely to spark other appeals to courts by those denied de-listing. The post Google loses &#8216;right to be forgotten&#8217; case in UK High Court appeared first on Search Engine Land. Please visit Search Engine Land for the full article. </p>
<p>Read the original here:<br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://feeds.searchengineland.com/~r/searchengineland/~3/USFeXM5fQj4/google-loses-right-to-be-forgotten-case-in-uk-high-court-296251" title="Google loses ‘right to be forgotten’ case in UK High Court">Google loses ‘right to be forgotten’ case in UK High Court</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mg-mk.com/en/google-loses-%e2%80%98right-to-be-forgotten%e2%80%99-case-in-uk-high-court/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Europeans again raise the specter of breaking up Google</title>
		<link>http://mg-mk.com/en/europeans-again-raise-the-specter-of-breaking-up-google/</link>
		<comments>http://mg-mk.com/en/europeans-again-raise-the-specter-of-breaking-up-google/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Mar 2018 12:59:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[channel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[channel: industry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google: antitrust]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google: business issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google: critics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google: legal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal: regulation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mg-mk.com/en/europeans-again-raise-the-specter-of-breaking-up-google/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[More of a bargaining position, it's extremely unlikely to actually happen. ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>More of a bargaining position, it&#8217;s extremely unlikely to actually happen. </p>
<p>See the rest here:<br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://feeds.searchengineland.com/~r/searchengineland/~3/RMqTEDoG5yU/europeans-again-raise-the-specter-of-breaking-up-google-295043" title="Europeans again raise the specter of breaking up Google">Europeans again raise the specter of breaking up Google</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mg-mk.com/en/europeans-again-raise-the-specter-of-breaking-up-google/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Europeans again raise the specter of breaking up Google</title>
		<link>http://mg-mk.com/en/europeans-again-raise-the-specter-of-breaking-up-google/</link>
		<comments>http://mg-mk.com/en/europeans-again-raise-the-specter-of-breaking-up-google/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Mar 2018 12:59:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[channel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[channel: industry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google: antitrust]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google: business issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google: critics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google: legal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal: regulation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mg-mk.com/en/europeans-again-raise-the-specter-of-breaking-up-google/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[More of a bargaining position, it's extremely unlikely to actually happen. ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>More of a bargaining position, it&#8217;s extremely unlikely to actually happen. </p>
<p>See the rest here:<br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://feeds.searchengineland.com/~r/searchengineland/~3/RMqTEDoG5yU/europeans-again-raise-the-specter-of-breaking-up-google-295043" title="Europeans again raise the specter of breaking up Google">Europeans again raise the specter of breaking up Google</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mg-mk.com/en/europeans-again-raise-the-specter-of-breaking-up-google/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Disney theme parks now on Google Street View</title>
		<link>http://mg-mk.com/en/disney-theme-parks-now-on-google-street-view/</link>
		<comments>http://mg-mk.com/en/disney-theme-parks-now-on-google-street-view/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2018 16:59:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[channel: local]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google: critics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google: maps & local]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google: street view]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mg-mk.com/en/disney-theme-parks-now-on-google-street-view/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Users can now virtually tour almost every inch of Disney's many theme parks. The post Disney theme parks now on Google Street View appeared first on Search Engine Land. Please visit Search Engine Land for the full article]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Users can now virtually tour almost every inch of Disney&#8217;s many theme parks. The post Disney theme parks now on Google Street View appeared first on Search Engine Land. Please visit Search Engine Land for the full article</p>
<p>Read more here:<br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://feeds.searchengineland.com/~r/searchengineland/~3/NWbzDayia4E/disney-theme-parks-now-google-street-view-293560" title="Disney theme parks now on Google Street View">Disney theme parks now on Google Street View</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mg-mk.com/en/disney-theme-parks-now-on-google-street-view/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>German court: Google has no ‘duty to inspect’ websites for illegal content before displaying</title>
		<link>http://mg-mk.com/en/german-court-google-has-no-%e2%80%98duty-to-inspect%e2%80%99-websites-for-illegal-content-before-displaying/</link>
		<comments>http://mg-mk.com/en/german-court-google-has-no-%e2%80%98duty-to-inspect%e2%80%99-websites-for-illegal-content-before-displaying/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Feb 2018 14:26:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[channel: seo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google: critics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google: legal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google: outside us]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google: privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google: seo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google: web search]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal: privacy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mg-mk.com/en/german-court-google-has-no-%e2%80%98duty-to-inspect%e2%80%99-websites-for-illegal-content-before-displaying/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The court held that Google can't be held liable before being notified of a 'clearly recognizable violation' of individual rights. The post German court: Google has no &#8216;duty to inspect&#8217; websites for illegal content before displaying appeared first on Search Engine Land]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The court held that Google can&#8217;t be held liable before being notified of a &#8216;clearly recognizable violation&#8217; of individual rights. The post German court: Google has no &#8216;duty to inspect&#8217; websites for illegal content before displaying appeared first on Search Engine Land</p>
<p>Continue reading here:<br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://feeds.searchengineland.com/~r/searchengineland/~3/7SMYNBqjggg/german-court-google-no-duty-inspect-websites-illegal-content-displaying-293125" title="German court: Google has no ‘duty to inspect’ websites for illegal content before displaying">German court: Google has no ‘duty to inspect’ websites for illegal content before displaying</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mg-mk.com/en/german-court-google-has-no-%e2%80%98duty-to-inspect%e2%80%99-websites-for-illegal-content-before-displaying/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Law and reputation firms generate 21% of Right to Be Forgotten delistings, says Google</title>
		<link>http://mg-mk.com/en/law-and-reputation-firms-generate-21-of-right-to-be-forgotten-delistings-says-google/</link>
		<comments>http://mg-mk.com/en/law-and-reputation-firms-generate-21-of-right-to-be-forgotten-delistings-says-google/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Feb 2018 13:00:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[channel: seo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google: critics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google: outside us]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google: privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google: seo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google: web search]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal: privacy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mg-mk.com/en/law-and-reputation-firms-generate-21-of-right-to-be-forgotten-delistings-says-google/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[New report from Google digs into three years' worth of data on removal requests and exposes the delisting criteria. The post Law and reputation firms generate 21% of Right to Be Forgotten delistings, says Google appeared first on Search Engine Land]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>New report from Google digs into three years&#8217; worth of data on removal requests and exposes the delisting criteria. The post Law and reputation firms generate 21% of Right to Be Forgotten delistings, says Google appeared first on Search Engine Land</p>
<p>Excerpt from:<br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://feeds.searchengineland.com/~r/searchengineland/~3/upYMrnb9-Pw/google-law-reputation-management-firms-generate-21-right-forgotten-delistings-293081" title="Law and reputation firms generate 21% of Right to Be Forgotten delistings, says Google">Law and reputation firms generate 21% of Right to Be Forgotten delistings, says Google</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mg-mk.com/en/law-and-reputation-firms-generate-21-of-right-to-be-forgotten-delistings-says-google/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Federal Election Commission proposal toughens political ads disclosure rules</title>
		<link>http://mg-mk.com/en/federal-election-commission-proposal-toughens-political-ads-disclosure-rules/</link>
		<comments>http://mg-mk.com/en/federal-election-commission-proposal-toughens-political-ads-disclosure-rules/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Feb 2018 14:46:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[channel: sem]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google: adwords]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google: critics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google: legal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal: regulation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mg-mk.com/en/federal-election-commission-proposal-toughens-political-ads-disclosure-rules/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The rule would bring traditional media disclosure requirements to digital ads. The post Federal Election Commission proposal toughens political ads disclosure rules appeared first on Search Engine Land. Please visit Search Engine Land for the full article]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The rule would bring traditional media disclosure requirements to digital ads. The post Federal Election Commission proposal toughens political ads disclosure rules appeared first on Search Engine Land. Please visit Search Engine Land for the full article</p>
<p>Read the original:<br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://feeds.searchengineland.com/~r/searchengineland/~3/soqKNsc5TT8/federal-election-commission-proposal-toughens-political-ads-disclosure-rules-292259" title="Federal Election Commission proposal toughens political ads disclosure rules">Federal Election Commission proposal toughens political ads disclosure rules</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mg-mk.com/en/federal-election-commission-proposal-toughens-political-ads-disclosure-rules/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google, Getty Images enter a multi-year global licensing partnership</title>
		<link>http://mg-mk.com/en/google-getty-images-enter-a-multi-year-global-licensing-partnership/</link>
		<comments>http://mg-mk.com/en/google-getty-images-enter-a-multi-year-global-licensing-partnership/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Feb 2018 20:56:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[channel: seo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google: antitrust]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google: business issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google: critics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google: images]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google: legal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google: seo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal: copyright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal: regulation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mg-mk.com/en/google-getty-images-enter-a-multi-year-global-licensing-partnership/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The deal effectively ends Getty's European antitrust complaint against Google. ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The deal effectively ends Getty&#8217;s European antitrust complaint against Google. </p>
<p>Excerpt from:<br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://feeds.searchengineland.com/~r/searchengineland/~3/nrfTuSpxS9U/google-getty-images-enter-multi-year-global-licensing-partnership-291831" title="Google, Getty Images enter a multi-year global licensing partnership">Google, Getty Images enter a multi-year global licensing partnership</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mg-mk.com/en/google-getty-images-enter-a-multi-year-global-licensing-partnership/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google EU shopping rivals complain antitrust remedies aren’t working</title>
		<link>http://mg-mk.com/en/google-eu-shopping-rivals-complain-antitrust-remedies-aren%e2%80%99t-working/</link>
		<comments>http://mg-mk.com/en/google-eu-shopping-rivals-complain-antitrust-remedies-aren%e2%80%99t-working/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Jan 2018 13:17:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[channel: sem]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google: adwords]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google: antitrust]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google: critics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google: legal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google: outside us]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mg-mk.com/en/google-eu-shopping-rivals-complain-antitrust-remedies-aren%e2%80%99t-working/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[They're demanding more changes, saying their problems have intensified rather than improved since the EC ruling in June, 2017. The post Google EU shopping rivals complain antitrust remedies aren&#8217;t working appeared first on Search Engine Land. Please visit Search Engine Land for the full article. ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They&#8217;re demanding more changes, saying their problems have intensified rather than improved since the EC ruling in June, 2017. The post Google EU shopping rivals complain antitrust remedies aren&#8217;t working appeared first on Search Engine Land. Please visit Search Engine Land for the full article. </p>
<p>See the original post here:<br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://feeds.searchengineland.com/~r/searchengineland/~3/LO2ALwVMeJA/google-eu-shopping-rivals-complain-antitrust-remedies-arent-working-290859" title="Google EU shopping rivals complain antitrust remedies aren’t working">Google EU shopping rivals complain antitrust remedies aren’t working</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mg-mk.com/en/google-eu-shopping-rivals-complain-antitrust-remedies-aren%e2%80%99t-working/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
