<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>MG Marketing &#187; google: legal</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mg-mk.com/en/tag/google-legal/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mg-mk.com/en</link>
	<description>Online Marketing Agency</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 Apr 2026 12:00:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Google rolls out new ID requirements for US political ads</title>
		<link>http://mg-mk.com/en/google-rolls-out-new-id-requirements-for-us-political-ads/</link>
		<comments>http://mg-mk.com/en/google-rolls-out-new-id-requirements-for-us-political-ads/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 May 2018 16:26:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[channel: sem]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google: legal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google: privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal: privacy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mg-mk.com/en/google-rolls-out-new-id-requirements-for-us-political-ads/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Due to increased scrutiny of how these ads affect users and voters, company says more transparency intiatives are to come. ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Due to increased scrutiny of how these ads affect users and voters, company says more transparency intiatives are to come. </p>
<p>Read the rest here:<br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://feeds.searchengineland.com/~r/searchengineland/~3/nMQMgeHbA3U/google-rolls-out-new-id-requirements-for-us-political-ads-297530" title="Google rolls out new ID requirements for US political ads">Google rolls out new ID requirements for US political ads</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mg-mk.com/en/google-rolls-out-new-id-requirements-for-us-political-ads/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google involved in Supreme Court case that may change class-action damages awards</title>
		<link>http://mg-mk.com/en/google-involved-in-supreme-court-case-that-may-change-class-action-damages-awards/</link>
		<comments>http://mg-mk.com/en/google-involved-in-supreme-court-case-that-may-change-class-action-damages-awards/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 May 2018 13:13:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[alphabet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[channel: seo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google: critics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google: legal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google: web search]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal: general]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal: privacy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mg-mk.com/en/google-involved-in-supreme-court-case-that-may-change-class-action-damages-awards/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The question before the court involves 'cy-près' and whether it was OK for plaintiffs' attorneys to allocate settlement money to their own law schools. The post Google involved in Supreme Court case that may change class-action damages awards appeared first on Search Engine Land]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The question before the court involves &#8216;cy-près&#8217; and whether it was OK for plaintiffs&#8217; attorneys to allocate settlement money to their own law schools. The post Google involved in Supreme Court case that may change class-action damages awards appeared first on Search Engine Land</p>
<p>Read this article:<br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://feeds.searchengineland.com/~r/searchengineland/~3/QI8Xctn80BE/google-involved-in-supreme-court-case-that-may-change-class-action-damages-awards-297232" title="Google involved in Supreme Court case that may change class-action damages awards">Google involved in Supreme Court case that may change class-action damages awards</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mg-mk.com/en/google-involved-in-supreme-court-case-that-may-change-class-action-damages-awards/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google loses ‘right to be forgotten’ case in UK High Court</title>
		<link>http://mg-mk.com/en/google-loses-%e2%80%98right-to-be-forgotten%e2%80%99-case-in-uk-high-court/</link>
		<comments>http://mg-mk.com/en/google-loses-%e2%80%98right-to-be-forgotten%e2%80%99-case-in-uk-high-court/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Apr 2018 16:53:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google: critics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google: legal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google: outside us]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal: privacy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mg-mk.com/en/google-loses-%e2%80%98right-to-be-forgotten%e2%80%99-case-in-uk-high-court/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Decision likely to spark other appeals to courts by those denied de-listing. The post Google loses &#8216;right to be forgotten&#8217; case in UK High Court appeared first on Search Engine Land. Please visit Search Engine Land for the full article. ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Decision likely to spark other appeals to courts by those denied de-listing. The post Google loses &#8216;right to be forgotten&#8217; case in UK High Court appeared first on Search Engine Land. Please visit Search Engine Land for the full article. </p>
<p>Read the original here:<br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://feeds.searchengineland.com/~r/searchengineland/~3/USFeXM5fQj4/google-loses-right-to-be-forgotten-case-in-uk-high-court-296251" title="Google loses ‘right to be forgotten’ case in UK High Court">Google loses ‘right to be forgotten’ case in UK High Court</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mg-mk.com/en/google-loses-%e2%80%98right-to-be-forgotten%e2%80%99-case-in-uk-high-court/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Europeans again raise the specter of breaking up Google</title>
		<link>http://mg-mk.com/en/europeans-again-raise-the-specter-of-breaking-up-google/</link>
		<comments>http://mg-mk.com/en/europeans-again-raise-the-specter-of-breaking-up-google/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Mar 2018 12:59:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[channel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[channel: industry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google: antitrust]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google: business issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google: critics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google: legal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal: regulation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mg-mk.com/en/europeans-again-raise-the-specter-of-breaking-up-google/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[More of a bargaining position, it's extremely unlikely to actually happen. ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>More of a bargaining position, it&#8217;s extremely unlikely to actually happen. </p>
<p>See the rest here:<br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://feeds.searchengineland.com/~r/searchengineland/~3/RMqTEDoG5yU/europeans-again-raise-the-specter-of-breaking-up-google-295043" title="Europeans again raise the specter of breaking up Google">Europeans again raise the specter of breaking up Google</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mg-mk.com/en/europeans-again-raise-the-specter-of-breaking-up-google/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Europeans again raise the specter of breaking up Google</title>
		<link>http://mg-mk.com/en/europeans-again-raise-the-specter-of-breaking-up-google/</link>
		<comments>http://mg-mk.com/en/europeans-again-raise-the-specter-of-breaking-up-google/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Mar 2018 12:59:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[channel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[channel: industry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google: antitrust]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google: business issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google: critics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google: legal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal: regulation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mg-mk.com/en/europeans-again-raise-the-specter-of-breaking-up-google/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[More of a bargaining position, it's extremely unlikely to actually happen. ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>More of a bargaining position, it&#8217;s extremely unlikely to actually happen. </p>
<p>See the rest here:<br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://feeds.searchengineland.com/~r/searchengineland/~3/RMqTEDoG5yU/europeans-again-raise-the-specter-of-breaking-up-google-295043" title="Europeans again raise the specter of breaking up Google">Europeans again raise the specter of breaking up Google</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mg-mk.com/en/europeans-again-raise-the-specter-of-breaking-up-google/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Report: EU to ask Google, others to publicly reveal ranking factors</title>
		<link>http://mg-mk.com/en/report-eu-to-ask-google-others-to-publicly-reveal-ranking-factors/</link>
		<comments>http://mg-mk.com/en/report-eu-to-ask-google-others-to-publicly-reveal-ranking-factors/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2018 14:22:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google: legal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google: outside us]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google: seo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google: web search]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal: regulation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mg-mk.com/en/report-eu-to-ask-google-others-to-publicly-reveal-ranking-factors/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Proposed rules are designed to redress the “superior bargaining power” of the large internet brands. The post Report: EU to ask Google, others to publicly reveal ranking factors appeared first on Search Engine Land. Please visit Search Engine Land for the full article]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Proposed rules are designed to redress the “superior bargaining power” of the large internet brands. The post Report: EU to ask Google, others to publicly reveal ranking factors appeared first on Search Engine Land. Please visit Search Engine Land for the full article</p>
<p>See more here:<br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://feeds.searchengineland.com/~r/searchengineland/~3/3X7aOtl_GJ8/report-eu-ask-google-others-publicly-reveal-ranking-factors-294233" title="Report: EU to ask Google, others to publicly reveal ranking factors">Report: EU to ask Google, others to publicly reveal ranking factors</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mg-mk.com/en/report-eu-to-ask-google-others-to-publicly-reveal-ranking-factors/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google’s antitrust infringement continues ‘unabated’, Google Shopping competitors tell European Commission</title>
		<link>http://mg-mk.com/en/google%e2%80%99s-antitrust-infringement-continues-%e2%80%98unabated%e2%80%99-google-shopping-competitors-tell-european-commission/</link>
		<comments>http://mg-mk.com/en/google%e2%80%99s-antitrust-infringement-continues-%e2%80%98unabated%e2%80%99-google-shopping-competitors-tell-european-commission/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Mar 2018 19:10:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[channel: sem]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google: antitrust]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google: google shopping]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google: legal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal: regulation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mg-mk.com/en/google%e2%80%99s-antitrust-infringement-continues-%e2%80%98unabated%e2%80%99-google-shopping-competitors-tell-european-commission/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Four months in, 19 rivals say too little has changed. The post Google&#8217;s antitrust infringement continues &#8216;unabated&#8217;, Google Shopping competitors tell European Commission appeared first on Search Engine Land. Please visit Search Engine Land for the full article]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Four months in, 19 rivals say too little has changed. The post Google&#8217;s antitrust infringement continues &#8216;unabated&#8217;, Google Shopping competitors tell European Commission appeared first on Search Engine Land. Please visit Search Engine Land for the full article</p>
<p>Follow this link:<br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://feeds.searchengineland.com/~r/searchengineland/~3/IdBjAJ2tisE/googles-antitrust-infringement-continues-unabated-google-shopping-competitors-tell-european-commission-293273" title="Google’s antitrust infringement continues ‘unabated’, Google Shopping competitors tell European Commission">Google’s antitrust infringement continues ‘unabated’, Google Shopping competitors tell European Commission</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mg-mk.com/en/google%e2%80%99s-antitrust-infringement-continues-%e2%80%98unabated%e2%80%99-google-shopping-competitors-tell-european-commission/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>German court: Google has no ‘duty to inspect’ websites for illegal content before displaying</title>
		<link>http://mg-mk.com/en/german-court-google-has-no-%e2%80%98duty-to-inspect%e2%80%99-websites-for-illegal-content-before-displaying/</link>
		<comments>http://mg-mk.com/en/german-court-google-has-no-%e2%80%98duty-to-inspect%e2%80%99-websites-for-illegal-content-before-displaying/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Feb 2018 14:26:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[channel: seo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google: critics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google: legal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google: outside us]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google: privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google: seo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google: web search]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal: privacy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mg-mk.com/en/german-court-google-has-no-%e2%80%98duty-to-inspect%e2%80%99-websites-for-illegal-content-before-displaying/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The court held that Google can't be held liable before being notified of a 'clearly recognizable violation' of individual rights. The post German court: Google has no &#8216;duty to inspect&#8217; websites for illegal content before displaying appeared first on Search Engine Land]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The court held that Google can&#8217;t be held liable before being notified of a &#8216;clearly recognizable violation&#8217; of individual rights. The post German court: Google has no &#8216;duty to inspect&#8217; websites for illegal content before displaying appeared first on Search Engine Land</p>
<p>Continue reading here:<br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://feeds.searchengineland.com/~r/searchengineland/~3/7SMYNBqjggg/german-court-google-no-duty-inspect-websites-illegal-content-displaying-293125" title="German court: Google has no ‘duty to inspect’ websites for illegal content before displaying">German court: Google has no ‘duty to inspect’ websites for illegal content before displaying</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mg-mk.com/en/german-court-google-has-no-%e2%80%98duty-to-inspect%e2%80%99-websites-for-illegal-content-before-displaying/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>In response to EU antitrust ruling, Google Shopping now shows ads from competing shopping engines</title>
		<link>http://mg-mk.com/en/in-response-to-eu-antitrust-ruling-google-shopping-now-shows-ads-from-competing-shopping-engines/</link>
		<comments>http://mg-mk.com/en/in-response-to-eu-antitrust-ruling-google-shopping-now-shows-ads-from-competing-shopping-engines/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Feb 2018 17:03:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[channel: retail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google: adwords]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google: antitrust]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google: legal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google: outside us]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal: regulation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mg-mk.com/en/in-response-to-eu-antitrust-ruling-google-shopping-now-shows-ads-from-competing-shopping-engines/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Comparison Shopping Engines are competing with Google for visibility in Google Shopping in the EU. The post In response to EU antitrust ruling, Google Shopping now shows ads from competing shopping engines appeared first on Search Engine Land. Please visit Search Engine Land for the full article. ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Comparison Shopping Engines are competing with Google for visibility in Google Shopping in the EU. The post In response to EU antitrust ruling, Google Shopping now shows ads from competing shopping engines appeared first on Search Engine Land. Please visit Search Engine Land for the full article. </p>
<p>Continued here:<br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://feeds.searchengineland.com/~r/searchengineland/~3/DZnHffFCrrg/response-eu-antitrust-ruling-google-shopping-now-showing-ads-competing-cses-293059" title="In response to EU antitrust ruling, Google Shopping now shows ads from competing shopping engines">In response to EU antitrust ruling, Google Shopping now shows ads from competing shopping engines</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mg-mk.com/en/in-response-to-eu-antitrust-ruling-google-shopping-now-shows-ads-from-competing-shopping-engines/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Keyword infringement: Edible Arrangements files $209M trademark suit against Google</title>
		<link>http://mg-mk.com/en/keyword-infringement-edible-arrangements-files-209m-trademark-suit-against-google/</link>
		<comments>http://mg-mk.com/en/keyword-infringement-edible-arrangements-files-209m-trademark-suit-against-google/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Feb 2018 20:26:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[channel: sem]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google: adwords]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google: legal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal: trademarks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mg-mk.com/en/keyword-infringement-edible-arrangements-files-209m-trademark-suit-against-google/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[While use of trademarked keywords has been allowed by courts, this case may be more complicated than it seems on the surface. The post Keyword infringement: Edible Arrangements files $209M trademark suit against Google appeared first on Search Engine Land. Please visit Search Engine Land for the full article. ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While use of trademarked keywords has been allowed by courts, this case may be more complicated than it seems on the surface. The post Keyword infringement: Edible Arrangements files $209M trademark suit against Google appeared first on Search Engine Land. Please visit Search Engine Land for the full article. </p>
<p>View post:<br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://feeds.searchengineland.com/~r/searchengineland/~3/hRvNftQtfB0/edible-arrangements-files-209-trademark-suit-google-292423" title="Keyword infringement: Edible Arrangements files $209M trademark suit against Google">Keyword infringement: Edible Arrangements files $209M trademark suit against Google</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mg-mk.com/en/keyword-infringement-edible-arrangements-files-209m-trademark-suit-against-google/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
