<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>MG Marketing &#187; google optimization</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mg-mk.com/en/tag/google-optimization/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mg-mk.com/en</link>
	<description>Online Marketing Agency</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2026 13:30:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Google+ Optimization vs. Community Building: Pros &amp; Cons of Google SPYW</title>
		<link>http://mg-mk.com/en/google-optimization-vs-community-building-pros-cons-of-google-spyw/</link>
		<comments>http://mg-mk.com/en/google-optimization-vs-community-building-pros-cons-of-google-spyw/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 11:00:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google optimization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pros]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search engines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social networking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[spyw]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mg-mk.com/en/google-optimization-vs-community-building-pros-cons-of-google-spyw/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ Google+ Optimization or Community Building? Initially I looked at Google+ the same as other Google social projects like Wave and Orkut. ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> Google+ Optimization or Community Building? Initially I looked at Google+ the same as other Google social projects like Wave and Orkut. </p>
<p><img src="http://mg-mk.com/en/wp-content/uploads/0032935640oogle+.png-150x115.png" /></p>
<p>Excerpt from:<br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/OnlineMarketingSEOBlog/~3/WAYWkEcX5BQ/" title="Google+ Optimization vs. Community Building: Pros &amp; Cons of Google SPYW">Google+ Optimization vs. Community Building: Pros &amp; Cons of Google SPYW</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mg-mk.com/en/google-optimization-vs-community-building-pros-cons-of-google-spyw/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google News Updates Algorithm &amp; Drops Many Publishers?</title>
		<link>http://mg-mk.com/en/google-news-updates-algorithm-drops-many-publishers/</link>
		<comments>http://mg-mk.com/en/google-news-updates-algorithm-drops-many-publishers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Dec 2010 12:55:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google optimization]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mg-mk.com/en/google-news-updates-algorithm-drops-many-publishers/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Over the past few weeks, I have seen an influx of both complaints about Google News Spam and publishers being dropped out of the Google News index. I honestly felt they went hand in hand]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Over the past few weeks, I have seen an influx of both complaints about Google News Spam and publishers being dropped out of the Google News index. I honestly felt they went hand in hand</p>
</p>
<p>Here is the original post:<br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://feeds.seroundtable.com/~r/SearchEngineRoundtable1/~3/gX_nBBv-LW4/023342.html" title="Google News Updates Algorithm &amp; Drops Many Publishers?">Google News Updates Algorithm &amp; Drops Many Publishers?</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mg-mk.com/en/google-news-updates-algorithm-drops-many-publishers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Should Google Remove Q&amp;A Sites From Search Results?</title>
		<link>http://mg-mk.com/en/should-google-remove-qa-sites-from-search-results/</link>
		<comments>http://mg-mk.com/en/should-google-remove-qa-sites-from-search-results/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Nov 2010 13:17:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google optimization]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mg-mk.com/en/should-google-remove-qa-sites-from-search-results/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Aaron Wall named Q&#038;A sites spam of the year in Google. We all know Google doesn't want search results in their search index. Google says they do not want to display a link to a search engine's search results as... ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Aaron Wall named Q&#038;A sites spam of the year in Google. We all know Google doesn&#8217;t want search results in their search index. Google says they do not want to display a link to a search engine&#8217;s search results as&#8230; </p>
</p>
<p>View original post here:<br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://feeds.seroundtable.com/~r/SearchEngineRoundtable1/~3/nok2wXccRo8/023330.html" title="Should Google Remove Q&#038;A Sites From Search Results?">Should Google Remove Q&#038;A Sites From Search Results?</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mg-mk.com/en/should-google-remove-qa-sites-from-search-results/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google Published Detailed Specifications on Robots.txt</title>
		<link>http://mg-mk.com/en/google-published-detailed-specifications-on-robots-txt/</link>
		<comments>http://mg-mk.com/en/google-published-detailed-specifications-on-robots-txt/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Nov 2010 13:28:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google optimization]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mg-mk.com/en/google-published-detailed-specifications-on-robots-txt/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Webmasters and SEOs have new reading material for this weekend. Google has published a very comprehensive and detailed Robots.txt Specifications, Robots meta tag and X-Robots-Tag HTTP header specifications and how to control crawling and indexing by GoogleBot. There are two... ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Webmasters and SEOs have new reading material for this weekend. Google has published a very comprehensive and detailed Robots.txt Specifications, Robots meta tag and X-Robots-Tag HTTP header specifications and how to control crawling and indexing by GoogleBot. There are two&#8230; </p>
</p>
<p>Read more:<br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://feeds.seroundtable.com/~r/SearchEngineRoundtable1/~3/Nl2UWsW0_yo/023324.html" title="Google Published Detailed Specifications on Robots.txt">Google Published Detailed Specifications on Robots.txt</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mg-mk.com/en/google-published-detailed-specifications-on-robots-txt/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google Sitemaps Bug Squashed Over Thanksgiving</title>
		<link>http://mg-mk.com/en/google-sitemaps-bug-squashed-over-thanksgiving/</link>
		<comments>http://mg-mk.com/en/google-sitemaps-bug-squashed-over-thanksgiving/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Nov 2010 12:43:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google optimization]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mg-mk.com/en/google-sitemaps-bug-squashed-over-thanksgiving/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On the eve of Thanksgiving, several complaints started popping up in the Google Webmaster Help forums. ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On the eve of Thanksgiving, several complaints started popping up in the Google Webmaster Help forums. </p>
</p>
<p>Read the original post:<br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://feeds.seroundtable.com/~r/SearchEngineRoundtable1/~3/FJ59ik9SJm8/023320.html" title="Google Sitemaps Bug Squashed Over Thanksgiving">Google Sitemaps Bug Squashed Over Thanksgiving</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mg-mk.com/en/google-sitemaps-bug-squashed-over-thanksgiving/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google Social Search Coming To Google Images</title>
		<link>http://mg-mk.com/en/google-social-search-coming-to-google-images/</link>
		<comments>http://mg-mk.com/en/google-social-search-coming-to-google-images/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Nov 2010 13:46:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google optimization]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mg-mk.com/en/google-social-search-coming-to-google-images/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Google Social Search launched over a year ago. It really hasn't caused much of a stir over the year. But now there are signs that Google Social Search is being expanded to Google Image Search]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google Social Search launched over a year ago. It really hasn&#8217;t caused much of a stir over the year. But now there are signs that Google Social Search is being expanded to Google Image Search</p>
</p>
<p>See the rest here:<br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://feeds.seroundtable.com/~r/SearchEngineRoundtable1/~3/CBJ9ciFyOS0/023316.html" title="Google Social Search Coming To Google Images">Google Social Search Coming To Google Images</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mg-mk.com/en/google-social-search-coming-to-google-images/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>SEO Claims Twitter Increased Rankings From Page 4 To Number 2 On Page 1</title>
		<link>http://mg-mk.com/en/seo-claims-twitter-increased-rankings-from-page-4-to-number-2-on-page-1/</link>
		<comments>http://mg-mk.com/en/seo-claims-twitter-increased-rankings-from-page-4-to-number-2-on-page-1/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Nov 2010 13:34:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google optimization]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mg-mk.com/en/seo-claims-twitter-increased-rankings-from-page-4-to-number-2-on-page-1/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There is a subscription only thread at WebmasterWorld that has one SEO claiming he was able to increase his site's ranking only through Twitter. What he did was send hundreds of Tweets over the timespan of two months. He tailored... ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is a subscription only thread at WebmasterWorld that has one SEO claiming he was able to increase his site&#8217;s ranking only through Twitter. What he did was send hundreds of Tweets over the timespan of two months. He tailored&#8230; </p>
</p>
<p>More here:<br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://feeds.seroundtable.com/~r/SearchEngineRoundtable1/~3/781vMbzcecE/023315.html" title="SEO Claims Twitter Increased Rankings From Page 4 To Number 2 On Page 1">SEO Claims Twitter Increased Rankings From Page 4 To Number 2 On Page 1</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mg-mk.com/en/seo-claims-twitter-increased-rankings-from-page-4-to-number-2-on-page-1/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google&#8217;s Site Operator Now Less Buggy &amp; More Accurate?</title>
		<link>http://mg-mk.com/en/googles-site-operator-now-less-buggy-more-accurate/</link>
		<comments>http://mg-mk.com/en/googles-site-operator-now-less-buggy-more-accurate/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Nov 2010 13:27:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google optimization]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mg-mk.com/en/googles-site-operator-now-less-buggy-more-accurate/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In the past years, SEOs have known not to use the site command or operator, i.e. ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the past years, SEOs have known not to use the site command or operator, i.e. </p>
</p>
<p>Here is the original post:<br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://feeds.seroundtable.com/~r/SearchEngineRoundtable1/~3/Oh2CjU2Ouys/023310.html" title="Google's Site Operator Now Less Buggy &amp; More Accurate?">Google&#8217;s Site Operator Now Less Buggy &amp; More Accurate?</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mg-mk.com/en/googles-site-operator-now-less-buggy-more-accurate/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google&#8217;s Site Operator Now Less Buggy &amp; More Accurate?</title>
		<link>http://mg-mk.com/en/googles-site-operator-now-less-buggy-more-accurate-2/</link>
		<comments>http://mg-mk.com/en/googles-site-operator-now-less-buggy-more-accurate-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Nov 2010 13:27:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google optimization]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mg-mk.com/en/googles-site-operator-now-less-buggy-more-accurate-2/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In the past years, SEOs have known not to use the site command or operator, i.e. site:www.domain.com in Google to determine the number of pages indexed for their site]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the past years, SEOs have known not to use the site command or operator, i.e. site:www.domain.com in Google to determine the number of pages indexed for their site</p>
</p>
<p>Excerpt from:<br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://feeds.seroundtable.com/~r/SearchEngineRoundtable1/~3/Oh2CjU2Ouys/023310.html" title="Google's Site Operator Now Less Buggy &amp; More Accurate?">Google&#8217;s Site Operator Now Less Buggy &amp; More Accurate?</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mg-mk.com/en/googles-site-operator-now-less-buggy-more-accurate-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How To Prevent The &quot;Googlebot Found an Extremely High Number&quot; Message</title>
		<link>http://mg-mk.com/en/how-to-prevent-the-googlebot-found-an-extremely-high-number-message/</link>
		<comments>http://mg-mk.com/en/how-to-prevent-the-googlebot-found-an-extremely-high-number-message/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Nov 2010 13:16:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google optimization]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mg-mk.com/en/how-to-prevent-the-googlebot-found-an-extremely-high-number-message/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Receiving a message in Google Webmaster Tools that reads "Googlebot found an extremely high number" is not uncommon for large sites. ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Receiving a message in Google Webmaster Tools that reads &#8220;Googlebot found an extremely high number&#8221; is not uncommon for large sites. </p>
</p>
<p>See the rest here:<br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://feeds.seroundtable.com/~r/SearchEngineRoundtable1/~3/eaREMJJs80M/023309.html" title="How To Prevent The &quot;Googlebot Found an Extremely High Number&quot; Message">How To Prevent The &quot;Googlebot Found an Extremely High Number&quot; Message</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mg-mk.com/en/how-to-prevent-the-googlebot-found-an-extremely-high-number-message/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
