<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>MG Marketing &#187; google: outside us</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mg-mk.com/en/tag/google-outside-us/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mg-mk.com/en</link>
	<description>Online Marketing Agency</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 Apr 2026 12:00:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Google loses ‘right to be forgotten’ case in UK High Court</title>
		<link>http://mg-mk.com/en/google-loses-%e2%80%98right-to-be-forgotten%e2%80%99-case-in-uk-high-court/</link>
		<comments>http://mg-mk.com/en/google-loses-%e2%80%98right-to-be-forgotten%e2%80%99-case-in-uk-high-court/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Apr 2018 16:53:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google: critics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google: legal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google: outside us]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal: privacy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mg-mk.com/en/google-loses-%e2%80%98right-to-be-forgotten%e2%80%99-case-in-uk-high-court/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Decision likely to spark other appeals to courts by those denied de-listing. The post Google loses &#8216;right to be forgotten&#8217; case in UK High Court appeared first on Search Engine Land. Please visit Search Engine Land for the full article. ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Decision likely to spark other appeals to courts by those denied de-listing. The post Google loses &#8216;right to be forgotten&#8217; case in UK High Court appeared first on Search Engine Land. Please visit Search Engine Land for the full article. </p>
<p>Read the original here:<br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://feeds.searchengineland.com/~r/searchengineland/~3/USFeXM5fQj4/google-loses-right-to-be-forgotten-case-in-uk-high-court-296251" title="Google loses ‘right to be forgotten’ case in UK High Court">Google loses ‘right to be forgotten’ case in UK High Court</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mg-mk.com/en/google-loses-%e2%80%98right-to-be-forgotten%e2%80%99-case-in-uk-high-court/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>To comply with GDPR, Google asks publishers to manage user-data consent for ad targeting in EU</title>
		<link>http://mg-mk.com/en/to-comply-with-gdpr-google-asks-publishers-to-manage-user-data-consent-for-ad-targeting-in-eu/</link>
		<comments>http://mg-mk.com/en/to-comply-with-gdpr-google-asks-publishers-to-manage-user-data-consent-for-ad-targeting-in-eu/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Mar 2018 13:28:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[channel: sem]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google adsense]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google: adwords]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google: outside us]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal: privacy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mg-mk.com/en/to-comply-with-gdpr-google-asks-publishers-to-manage-user-data-consent-for-ad-targeting-in-eu/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Publishers are being asked to manage the consent process on behalf of Google. The post To comply with GDPR, Google asks publishers to manage user-data consent for ad targeting in EU appeared first on Search Engine Land. Please visit Search Engine Land for the full article. ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Publishers are being asked to manage the consent process on behalf of Google. The post To comply with GDPR, Google asks publishers to manage user-data consent for ad targeting in EU appeared first on Search Engine Land. Please visit Search Engine Land for the full article. </p>
<p>Excerpt from:<br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://feeds.searchengineland.com/~r/searchengineland/~3/GpRLzs90ZVg/report-google-asks-publishers-to-manage-user-data-consent-for-ad-targeting-in-eu-gdpr-294917" title="To comply with GDPR, Google asks publishers to manage user-data consent for ad targeting in EU">To comply with GDPR, Google asks publishers to manage user-data consent for ad targeting in EU</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mg-mk.com/en/to-comply-with-gdpr-google-asks-publishers-to-manage-user-data-consent-for-ad-targeting-in-eu/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Report: EU to ask Google, others to publicly reveal ranking factors</title>
		<link>http://mg-mk.com/en/report-eu-to-ask-google-others-to-publicly-reveal-ranking-factors/</link>
		<comments>http://mg-mk.com/en/report-eu-to-ask-google-others-to-publicly-reveal-ranking-factors/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2018 14:22:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google: legal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google: outside us]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google: seo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google: web search]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal: regulation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mg-mk.com/en/report-eu-to-ask-google-others-to-publicly-reveal-ranking-factors/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Proposed rules are designed to redress the “superior bargaining power” of the large internet brands. The post Report: EU to ask Google, others to publicly reveal ranking factors appeared first on Search Engine Land. Please visit Search Engine Land for the full article]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Proposed rules are designed to redress the “superior bargaining power” of the large internet brands. The post Report: EU to ask Google, others to publicly reveal ranking factors appeared first on Search Engine Land. Please visit Search Engine Land for the full article</p>
<p>See more here:<br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://feeds.searchengineland.com/~r/searchengineland/~3/3X7aOtl_GJ8/report-eu-ask-google-others-publicly-reveal-ranking-factors-294233" title="Report: EU to ask Google, others to publicly reveal ranking factors">Report: EU to ask Google, others to publicly reveal ranking factors</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mg-mk.com/en/report-eu-to-ask-google-others-to-publicly-reveal-ranking-factors/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>German court: Google has no ‘duty to inspect’ websites for illegal content before displaying</title>
		<link>http://mg-mk.com/en/german-court-google-has-no-%e2%80%98duty-to-inspect%e2%80%99-websites-for-illegal-content-before-displaying/</link>
		<comments>http://mg-mk.com/en/german-court-google-has-no-%e2%80%98duty-to-inspect%e2%80%99-websites-for-illegal-content-before-displaying/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Feb 2018 14:26:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[channel: seo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google: critics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google: legal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google: outside us]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google: privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google: seo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google: web search]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal: privacy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mg-mk.com/en/german-court-google-has-no-%e2%80%98duty-to-inspect%e2%80%99-websites-for-illegal-content-before-displaying/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The court held that Google can't be held liable before being notified of a 'clearly recognizable violation' of individual rights. The post German court: Google has no &#8216;duty to inspect&#8217; websites for illegal content before displaying appeared first on Search Engine Land]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The court held that Google can&#8217;t be held liable before being notified of a &#8216;clearly recognizable violation&#8217; of individual rights. The post German court: Google has no &#8216;duty to inspect&#8217; websites for illegal content before displaying appeared first on Search Engine Land</p>
<p>Continue reading here:<br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://feeds.searchengineland.com/~r/searchengineland/~3/7SMYNBqjggg/german-court-google-no-duty-inspect-websites-illegal-content-displaying-293125" title="German court: Google has no ‘duty to inspect’ websites for illegal content before displaying">German court: Google has no ‘duty to inspect’ websites for illegal content before displaying</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mg-mk.com/en/german-court-google-has-no-%e2%80%98duty-to-inspect%e2%80%99-websites-for-illegal-content-before-displaying/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Law and reputation firms generate 21% of Right to Be Forgotten delistings, says Google</title>
		<link>http://mg-mk.com/en/law-and-reputation-firms-generate-21-of-right-to-be-forgotten-delistings-says-google/</link>
		<comments>http://mg-mk.com/en/law-and-reputation-firms-generate-21-of-right-to-be-forgotten-delistings-says-google/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Feb 2018 13:00:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[channel: seo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google: critics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google: outside us]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google: privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google: seo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google: web search]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal: privacy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mg-mk.com/en/law-and-reputation-firms-generate-21-of-right-to-be-forgotten-delistings-says-google/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[New report from Google digs into three years' worth of data on removal requests and exposes the delisting criteria. The post Law and reputation firms generate 21% of Right to Be Forgotten delistings, says Google appeared first on Search Engine Land]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>New report from Google digs into three years&#8217; worth of data on removal requests and exposes the delisting criteria. The post Law and reputation firms generate 21% of Right to Be Forgotten delistings, says Google appeared first on Search Engine Land</p>
<p>Excerpt from:<br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://feeds.searchengineland.com/~r/searchengineland/~3/upYMrnb9-Pw/google-law-reputation-management-firms-generate-21-right-forgotten-delistings-293081" title="Law and reputation firms generate 21% of Right to Be Forgotten delistings, says Google">Law and reputation firms generate 21% of Right to Be Forgotten delistings, says Google</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mg-mk.com/en/law-and-reputation-firms-generate-21-of-right-to-be-forgotten-delistings-says-google/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>In response to EU antitrust ruling, Google Shopping now shows ads from competing shopping engines</title>
		<link>http://mg-mk.com/en/in-response-to-eu-antitrust-ruling-google-shopping-now-shows-ads-from-competing-shopping-engines/</link>
		<comments>http://mg-mk.com/en/in-response-to-eu-antitrust-ruling-google-shopping-now-shows-ads-from-competing-shopping-engines/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Feb 2018 17:03:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[channel: retail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google: adwords]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google: antitrust]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google: legal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google: outside us]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal: regulation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mg-mk.com/en/in-response-to-eu-antitrust-ruling-google-shopping-now-shows-ads-from-competing-shopping-engines/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Comparison Shopping Engines are competing with Google for visibility in Google Shopping in the EU. The post In response to EU antitrust ruling, Google Shopping now shows ads from competing shopping engines appeared first on Search Engine Land. Please visit Search Engine Land for the full article. ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Comparison Shopping Engines are competing with Google for visibility in Google Shopping in the EU. The post In response to EU antitrust ruling, Google Shopping now shows ads from competing shopping engines appeared first on Search Engine Land. Please visit Search Engine Land for the full article. </p>
<p>Continued here:<br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://feeds.searchengineland.com/~r/searchengineland/~3/DZnHffFCrrg/response-eu-antitrust-ruling-google-shopping-now-showing-ads-competing-cses-293059" title="In response to EU antitrust ruling, Google Shopping now shows ads from competing shopping engines">In response to EU antitrust ruling, Google Shopping now shows ads from competing shopping engines</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mg-mk.com/en/in-response-to-eu-antitrust-ruling-google-shopping-now-shows-ads-from-competing-shopping-engines/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>India’s competition regulator fines Google $21.1 million for ‘search bias’ in travel results</title>
		<link>http://mg-mk.com/en/india%e2%80%99s-competition-regulator-fines-google-21-1-million-for-%e2%80%98search-bias%e2%80%99-in-travel-results/</link>
		<comments>http://mg-mk.com/en/india%e2%80%99s-competition-regulator-fines-google-21-1-million-for-%e2%80%98search-bias%e2%80%99-in-travel-results/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Feb 2018 22:38:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[alphabet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google: adwords]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google: antitrust]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google: legal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google: outside us]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal: regulation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mg-mk.com/en/india%e2%80%99s-competition-regulator-fines-google-21-1-million-for-%e2%80%98search-bias%e2%80%99-in-travel-results/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[However, the OneBox and other search practices were cleared by the Committee. ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>However, the OneBox and other search practices were cleared by the Committee. </p>
<p>Go here to see the original:<br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://feeds.searchengineland.com/~r/searchengineland/~3/dZ81CwjqRZs/indias-competition-regulator-fines-google-21-1-million-search-bias-travel-results-291611" title="India’s competition regulator fines Google $21.1 million for ‘search bias’ in travel results">India’s competition regulator fines Google $21.1 million for ‘search bias’ in travel results</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mg-mk.com/en/india%e2%80%99s-competition-regulator-fines-google-21-1-million-for-%e2%80%98search-bias%e2%80%99-in-travel-results/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google EU shopping rivals complain antitrust remedies aren’t working</title>
		<link>http://mg-mk.com/en/google-eu-shopping-rivals-complain-antitrust-remedies-aren%e2%80%99t-working/</link>
		<comments>http://mg-mk.com/en/google-eu-shopping-rivals-complain-antitrust-remedies-aren%e2%80%99t-working/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Jan 2018 13:17:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[channel: sem]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google: adwords]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google: antitrust]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google: critics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google: legal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google: outside us]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mg-mk.com/en/google-eu-shopping-rivals-complain-antitrust-remedies-aren%e2%80%99t-working/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[They're demanding more changes, saying their problems have intensified rather than improved since the EC ruling in June, 2017. The post Google EU shopping rivals complain antitrust remedies aren&#8217;t working appeared first on Search Engine Land. Please visit Search Engine Land for the full article. ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They&#8217;re demanding more changes, saying their problems have intensified rather than improved since the EC ruling in June, 2017. The post Google EU shopping rivals complain antitrust remedies aren&#8217;t working appeared first on Search Engine Land. Please visit Search Engine Land for the full article. </p>
<p>See the original post here:<br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://feeds.searchengineland.com/~r/searchengineland/~3/LO2ALwVMeJA/google-eu-shopping-rivals-complain-antitrust-remedies-arent-working-290859" title="Google EU shopping rivals complain antitrust remedies aren’t working">Google EU shopping rivals complain antitrust remedies aren’t working</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mg-mk.com/en/google-eu-shopping-rivals-complain-antitrust-remedies-aren%e2%80%99t-working/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google EU shopping rivals complain antitrust remedies aren’t working</title>
		<link>http://mg-mk.com/en/google-eu-shopping-rivals-complain-antitrust-remedies-aren%e2%80%99t-working-2/</link>
		<comments>http://mg-mk.com/en/google-eu-shopping-rivals-complain-antitrust-remedies-aren%e2%80%99t-working-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Jan 2018 13:17:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[channel: sem]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google: adwords]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google: antitrust]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google: critics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google: legal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google: outside us]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mg-mk.com/en/google-eu-shopping-rivals-complain-antitrust-remedies-aren%e2%80%99t-working-2/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[They're demanding more changes, saying their problems have intensified rather than improved since the EC ruling in June, 2017. The post Google EU shopping rivals complain antitrust remedies aren&#8217;t working appeared first on Search Engine Land. Please visit Search Engine Land for the full article. ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They&#8217;re demanding more changes, saying their problems have intensified rather than improved since the EC ruling in June, 2017. The post Google EU shopping rivals complain antitrust remedies aren&#8217;t working appeared first on Search Engine Land. Please visit Search Engine Land for the full article. </p>
<p>See the original post here:<br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://feeds.searchengineland.com/~r/searchengineland/~3/LO2ALwVMeJA/google-eu-shopping-rivals-complain-antitrust-remedies-arent-working-290859" title="Google EU shopping rivals complain antitrust remedies aren’t working">Google EU shopping rivals complain antitrust remedies aren’t working</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mg-mk.com/en/google-eu-shopping-rivals-complain-antitrust-remedies-aren%e2%80%99t-working-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google facing $1 billion in potential liability with UK class action</title>
		<link>http://mg-mk.com/en/google-facing-1-billion-in-potential-liability-with-uk-class-action/</link>
		<comments>http://mg-mk.com/en/google-facing-1-billion-in-potential-liability-with-uk-class-action/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Dec 2017 13:30:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[apple]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[channel: mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google: business issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google: legal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google: outside us]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mg-mk.com/en/google-facing-1-billion-in-potential-liability-with-uk-class-action/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The case stems from bypassing the cookie-blocking settings on the iPhone's Safari browser in 2012. The post Google facing $1 billion in potential liability with UK class action appeared first on Search Engine Land. Please visit Search Engine Land for the full article. ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The case stems from bypassing the cookie-blocking settings on the iPhone&#8217;s Safari browser in 2012. The post Google facing $1 billion in potential liability with UK class action appeared first on Search Engine Land. Please visit Search Engine Land for the full article. </p>
<p>See original here:<br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://feeds.searchengineland.com/~r/searchengineland/~3/zc0TCOLGXXE/google-facing-1-billion-potential-liability-uk-class-action-287497" title="Google facing $1 billion in potential liability with UK class action">Google facing $1 billion in potential liability with UK class action</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mg-mk.com/en/google-facing-1-billion-in-potential-liability-with-uk-class-action/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
