<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>MG Marketing &#187; google ranking factors</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mg-mk.com/en/tag/google-ranking-factors/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mg-mk.com/en</link>
	<description>Online Marketing Agency</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2026 14:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Does Google’s Review Count Inflation Give Them An Unfair Advantage In Local Search?</title>
		<link>http://mg-mk.com/en/does-google%e2%80%99s-review-count-inflation-give-them-an-unfair-advantage-in-local-search/</link>
		<comments>http://mg-mk.com/en/does-google%e2%80%99s-review-count-inflation-give-them-an-unfair-advantage-in-local-search/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2014 13:20:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[channel: local]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google algorithm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google ranking factors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google review count]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google search results]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google+ advantage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google: maps & local]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[local search column]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mg-mk.com/en/does-google%e2%80%99s-review-count-inflation-give-them-an-unfair-advantage-in-local-search/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We all know that monitoring online reviews is important for online marketing; but lately, it seems that not all reviews are created equal. ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We all know that monitoring online reviews is important for online marketing; but lately, it seems that not all reviews are created equal. </p>
<p>View post:<br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://feeds.searchengineland.com/~r/searchengineland/~3/ovg9pfjZmz4/googles-review-count-inflation-give-unfair-advantage-local-search-185488" title="Does Google’s Review Count Inflation Give Them An Unfair Advantage In Local Search?">Does Google’s Review Count Inflation Give Them An Unfair Advantage In Local Search?</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mg-mk.com/en/does-google%e2%80%99s-review-count-inflation-give-them-an-unfair-advantage-in-local-search/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Is Chasing AuthorRank A Waste Of Time For SEOs?</title>
		<link>http://mg-mk.com/en/is-chasing-authorrank-a-waste-of-time-for-seos/</link>
		<comments>http://mg-mk.com/en/is-chasing-authorrank-a-waste-of-time-for-seos/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Mar 2014 14:50:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[all things seo column]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[authorrank]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[authorship tag]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[channel: seo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[eric schmidt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google authorship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google plus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google ranking factors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google serps]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[in-depth articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rel=author tagging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the new digital age]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mg-mk.com/en/is-chasing-authorrank-a-waste-of-time-for-seos/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On June 7, 2011, Google announced support for a new type of markup called the Authorship Tag. This was the rel=&#8221;author&#8221; tag]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On June 7, 2011, Google announced support for a new type of markup called the Authorship Tag. This was the rel=&#8221;author&#8221; tag</p>
<p>See the original post:<br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://feeds.searchengineland.com/~r/searchengineland/~3/jHDjIQjUmUU/chasing-authorrank-waste-time-185140" title="Is Chasing AuthorRank A Waste Of Time For SEOs?">Is Chasing AuthorRank A Waste Of Time For SEOs?</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mg-mk.com/en/is-chasing-authorrank-a-waste-of-time-for-seos/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google Changes Ranking Advice, Says Build Quality Sites Not Links</title>
		<link>http://mg-mk.com/en/google-changes-ranking-advice-says-build-quality-sites-not-links/</link>
		<comments>http://mg-mk.com/en/google-changes-ranking-advice-says-build-quality-sites-not-links/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 13:24:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[channel: seo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google ranking advice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google ranking factors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[quality sites not links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[top news]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mg-mk.com/en/google-changes-ranking-advice-says-build-quality-sites-not-links/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Google has quietly updated the rankings article within the Google Webmaster Help documentation. The change is to keep Google consistent with their general change in messaging that content is what webmasters should focus on, not links. Previously, the article had a line that read: In general,... ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google has quietly updated the rankings article within the Google Webmaster Help documentation. The change is to keep Google consistent with their general change in messaging that content is what webmasters should focus on, not links. Previously, the article had a line that read: In general,&#8230; </p>
<p>More:<br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://feeds.searchengineland.com/~r/searchengineland/~3/rZsmkg7uUkU/google-changes-ranking-advice-says-build-quality-sites-not-links-163931" title="Google Changes Ranking Advice, Says Build Quality Sites Not Links">Google Changes Ranking Advice, Says Build Quality Sites Not Links</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mg-mk.com/en/google-changes-ranking-advice-says-build-quality-sites-not-links/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
