<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>MG Marketing &#187; implied links</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mg-mk.com/en/tag/implied-links/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mg-mk.com/en</link>
	<description>Online Marketing Agency</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2026 22:10:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Are Brand Mentions The New Links? by @egabbert</title>
		<link>http://mg-mk.com/en/are-brand-mentions-the-new-links-by-egabbert/</link>
		<comments>http://mg-mk.com/en/are-brand-mentions-the-new-links-by-egabbert/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jun 2014 14:18:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[implied links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[panda patent]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mg-mk.com/en/are-brand-mentions-the-new-links-by-egabbert/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ Over at Moz, Simon Penson just wrote an interesting post about a “Panda Patent” which may shed light on how Google will rank sites in the future, “using a ratio of links and mentions, or ‘implied links.’” With penalties flying and the value of the almighty link coming into question, could Google be looking for new signals of authority? We think so, but are brand mentions the answer? ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> Over at Moz, Simon Penson just wrote an interesting post about a “Panda Patent” which may shed light on how Google will rank sites in the future, “using a ratio of links and mentions, or ‘implied links.’” With penalties flying and the value of the almighty link coming into question, could Google be looking for new signals of authority? We think so, but are brand mentions the answer? </p>
<p>Read the original here:<br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/SearchEngineJournal/~3/8U4nHKOHXzc/" title="Are Brand Mentions The New Links? by @egabbert">Are Brand Mentions The New Links? by @egabbert</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mg-mk.com/en/are-brand-mentions-the-new-links-by-egabbert/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
