<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>MG Marketing &#187; interflora</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mg-mk.com/en/tag/interflora/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mg-mk.com/en</link>
	<description>Online Marketing Agency</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2026 05:15:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Interflora Is Back: What Did They Fix &amp; How Did They Come Back So Fast?</title>
		<link>http://mg-mk.com/en/interflora-is-back-what-did-they-fix-how-did-they-come-back-so-fast/</link>
		<comments>http://mg-mk.com/en/interflora-is-back-what-did-they-fix-how-did-they-come-back-so-fast/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Mar 2013 17:50:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bad links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[features: analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google: seo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google: web search]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[interflora]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[link penalities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[link week]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rankings penalty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[seo penalty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[seo: spamming]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mg-mk.com/en/interflora-is-back-what-did-they-fix-how-did-they-come-back-so-fast/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Interflora got penalized only 2 weeks ago, right after Valentine’s day with a huge coverage in the media and also a some-what indirect statement from Google’s Matt Cutts himself about Advertorials also counting as paid links if they pass Page Rank (i.e. do not have NOFOLLOW tags on them). ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interflora got penalized only 2 weeks ago, right after Valentine’s day with a huge coverage in the media and also a some-what indirect statement from Google’s Matt Cutts himself about Advertorials also counting as paid links if they pass Page Rank (i.e. do not have NOFOLLOW tags on them). </p>
<p>Read more from the original source:<br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://feeds.searchengineland.com/~r/searchengineland/~3/50DE_zup1j0/interflora-is-back-what-did-they-fix-how-did-they-come-back-so-fast-150526" title="Interflora Is Back: What Did They Fix &amp; How Did They Come Back So Fast?">Interflora Is Back: What Did They Fix &amp; How Did They Come Back So Fast?</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mg-mk.com/en/interflora-is-back-what-did-they-fix-how-did-they-come-back-so-fast/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Interflora Gets Its Google Rankings Back, 11 Days After Penalty</title>
		<link>http://mg-mk.com/en/interflora-gets-its-google-rankings-back-11-days-after-penalty/</link>
		<comments>http://mg-mk.com/en/interflora-gets-its-google-rankings-back-11-days-after-penalty/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Mar 2013 00:23:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advertorials]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google: seo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google: web search]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[interflora]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[seo: spamming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[spam]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[top news]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mg-mk.com/en/interflora-gets-its-google-rankings-back-11-days-after-penalty/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Interflora, the major UK flower delivery service, is showing up again in Google&#8217;s search results &#8212; just 11 days after it was penalized. According to some tweets and posts on Google+, Chris Gilchrist was first to spot Interflora&#8217;s resurrection today]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interflora, the major UK flower delivery service, is showing up again in Google&#8217;s search results &#8212; just 11 days after it was penalized. According to some tweets and posts on Google+, Chris Gilchrist was first to spot Interflora&#8217;s resurrection today</p>
<p>Read more from the original source:<br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://feeds.searchengineland.com/~r/searchengineland/~3/PO73URIjUbE/interflora-gets-google-rankings-back-150366" title="Interflora Gets Its Google Rankings Back, 11 Days After Penalty">Interflora Gets Its Google Rankings Back, 11 Days After Penalty</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mg-mk.com/en/interflora-gets-its-google-rankings-back-11-days-after-penalty/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google Says No Comment On Why Interflora Was Penalized</title>
		<link>http://mg-mk.com/en/google-says-no-comment-on-why-interflora-was-penalized/</link>
		<comments>http://mg-mk.com/en/google-says-no-comment-on-why-interflora-was-penalized/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2013 13:52:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[features: analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google penalty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google: seo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google: web search]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[interflora]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[link penalty]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mg-mk.com/en/google-says-no-comment-on-why-interflora-was-penalized/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The popular UK flower website Interflora seems to have been penalized in Google. They no longer rank for their key terms, such as [flowers], [flower delivery] and related terms &#8212; nor do they rank for their own name [Interflora]. Here is a picture of the search results in Google UK for..]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The popular UK flower website Interflora seems to have been penalized in Google. They no longer rank for their key terms, such as [flowers], [flower delivery] and related terms &#8212; nor do they rank for their own name [Interflora]. Here is a picture of the search results in Google UK for..</p>
<p>Read the original:<br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://feeds.searchengineland.com/~r/searchengineland/~3/GhcksJs4buc/google-says-no-comment-on-why-interflora-was-penalized-149308" title="Google Says No Comment On Why Interflora Was Penalized">Google Says No Comment On Why Interflora Was Penalized</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mg-mk.com/en/google-says-no-comment-on-why-interflora-was-penalized/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
