<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>MG Marketing &#187; legal: general</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mg-mk.com/en/tag/legal-general/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mg-mk.com/en</link>
	<description>Online Marketing Agency</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2026 18:01:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Google involved in Supreme Court case that may change class-action damages awards</title>
		<link>http://mg-mk.com/en/google-involved-in-supreme-court-case-that-may-change-class-action-damages-awards/</link>
		<comments>http://mg-mk.com/en/google-involved-in-supreme-court-case-that-may-change-class-action-damages-awards/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 May 2018 13:13:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[alphabet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[channel: seo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google: critics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google: legal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google: web search]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal: general]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal: privacy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mg-mk.com/en/google-involved-in-supreme-court-case-that-may-change-class-action-damages-awards/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The question before the court involves 'cy-près' and whether it was OK for plaintiffs' attorneys to allocate settlement money to their own law schools. The post Google involved in Supreme Court case that may change class-action damages awards appeared first on Search Engine Land]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The question before the court involves &#8216;cy-près&#8217; and whether it was OK for plaintiffs&#8217; attorneys to allocate settlement money to their own law schools. The post Google involved in Supreme Court case that may change class-action damages awards appeared first on Search Engine Land</p>
<p>Read this article:<br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://feeds.searchengineland.com/~r/searchengineland/~3/QI8Xctn80BE/google-involved-in-supreme-court-case-that-may-change-class-action-damages-awards-297232" title="Google involved in Supreme Court case that may change class-action damages awards">Google involved in Supreme Court case that may change class-action damages awards</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mg-mk.com/en/google-involved-in-supreme-court-case-that-may-change-class-action-damages-awards/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>CEO who forged court order to get Google to remove defamation faces prison</title>
		<link>http://mg-mk.com/en/ceo-who-forged-court-order-to-get-google-to-remove-defamation-faces-prison/</link>
		<comments>http://mg-mk.com/en/ceo-who-forged-court-order-to-get-google-to-remove-defamation-faces-prison/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Nov 2017 19:05:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[all things seo column]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[channel: seo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google: legal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal: general]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mg-mk.com/en/ceo-who-forged-court-order-to-get-google-to-remove-defamation-faces-prison/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Contributor Chris Silver Smith tells the lamentable story of a sophisticated reputation attack and a victimized company led to take desperate steps to recover. The post CEO who forged court order to get Google to remove defamation faces prison appeared first on Search Engine Land]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Contributor Chris Silver Smith tells the lamentable story of a sophisticated reputation attack and a victimized company led to take desperate steps to recover. The post CEO who forged court order to get Google to remove defamation faces prison appeared first on Search Engine Land</p>
<p>Read the original:<br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://feeds.searchengineland.com/~r/searchengineland/~3/qPZt7B_cKF0/ceo-forged-court-order-get-google-remove-defamation-faces-prison-282946" title="CEO who forged court order to get Google to remove defamation faces prison">CEO who forged court order to get Google to remove defamation faces prison</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mg-mk.com/en/ceo-who-forged-court-order-to-get-google-to-remove-defamation-faces-prison/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How the EU fine will ruin Google Shopping for the consumer</title>
		<link>http://mg-mk.com/en/how-the-eu-fine-will-ruin-google-shopping-for-the-consumer/</link>
		<comments>http://mg-mk.com/en/how-the-eu-fine-will-ruin-google-shopping-for-the-consumer/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jun 2017 20:02:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[channel: sem]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google: antitrust]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google: google shopping]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google: legal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google: outside us]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal: general]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[paid search column]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mg-mk.com/en/how-the-eu-fine-will-ruin-google-shopping-for-the-consumer/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What will be the impact of the European Union's recent antitrust fine against Google? Columnist and shopping ads expert Andreas Reiffen weighs in]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What will be the impact of the European Union&#8217;s recent antitrust fine against Google? Columnist and shopping ads expert Andreas Reiffen weighs in</p>
<p>Original post:<br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://feeds.searchengineland.com/~r/searchengineland/~3/pU1PF1xtzWE/eu-fine-will-ruin-google-shopping-consumer-278045" title="How the EU fine will ruin Google Shopping for the consumer">How the EU fine will ruin Google Shopping for the consumer</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mg-mk.com/en/how-the-eu-fine-will-ruin-google-shopping-for-the-consumer/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Initial Interest Confusion rears its ugly head once more in trademark infringement case</title>
		<link>http://mg-mk.com/en/initial-interest-confusion-rears-its-ugly-head-once-more-in-trademark-infringement-case/</link>
		<comments>http://mg-mk.com/en/initial-interest-confusion-rears-its-ugly-head-once-more-in-trademark-infringement-case/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 May 2017 16:02:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[all things seo column]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[amazon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[channel: seo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal: general]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal: trademarks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search marketing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mg-mk.com/en/initial-interest-confusion-rears-its-ugly-head-once-more-in-trademark-infringement-case/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Columnist Chris Silver Smith details recent trademark infringement cases in which site search results pages caused legal issues for retailer sites. E-commerce businesses should take notice! The post Initial Interest Confusion rears its ugly head once more in trademark infringement case appeared... Please visit Search Engine Land for the full article]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Columnist Chris Silver Smith details recent trademark infringement cases in which site search results pages caused legal issues for retailer sites. E-commerce businesses should take notice! The post Initial Interest Confusion rears its ugly head once more in trademark infringement case appeared&#8230; Please visit Search Engine Land for the full article</p>
<p>Here is the original post:<br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://feeds.searchengineland.com/~r/searchengineland/~3/JtbdMsVcOeo/initial-interest-confusion-rears-ugly-head-trademark-infringement-case-e-commerce-sites-take-notice-275125" title="Initial Interest Confusion rears its ugly head once more in trademark infringement case">Initial Interest Confusion rears its ugly head once more in trademark infringement case</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mg-mk.com/en/initial-interest-confusion-rears-its-ugly-head-once-more-in-trademark-infringement-case/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What does the Consumer Review Fairness Act mean for consumers and online reviews?</title>
		<link>http://mg-mk.com/en/what-does-the-consumer-review-fairness-act-mean-for-consumers-and-online-reviews/</link>
		<comments>http://mg-mk.com/en/what-does-the-consumer-review-fairness-act-mean-for-consumers-and-online-reviews/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Dec 2016 15:05:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[channel: local]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal: general]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[local search column]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[yelp]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mg-mk.com/en/what-does-the-consumer-review-fairness-act-mean-for-consumers-and-online-reviews/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Columnist Sherry Bonelli discusses the impact that newly signed legislation may have on local business owners and review sites. The post What does the Consumer Review Fairness Act mean for consumers and online reviews? appeared first on Search Engine Land. ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Columnist Sherry Bonelli discusses the impact that newly signed legislation may have on local business owners and review sites. The post What does the Consumer Review Fairness Act mean for consumers and online reviews? appeared first on Search Engine Land. </p>
<p>Read more:<br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://feeds.searchengineland.com/~r/searchengineland/~3/va3mlRE1KQs/consumer-review-fairness-act-mean-consumers-online-reviews-264920" title="What does the Consumer Review Fairness Act mean for consumers and online reviews?">What does the Consumer Review Fairness Act mean for consumers and online reviews?</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mg-mk.com/en/what-does-the-consumer-review-fairness-act-mean-for-consumers-and-online-reviews/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>FTC sues 1-800 Contacts over reciprocal, ‘anti-competitive’ PPC bidding agreements</title>
		<link>http://mg-mk.com/en/ftc-sues-1-800-contacts-over-reciprocal-%e2%80%98anti-competitive%e2%80%99-ppc-bidding-agreements/</link>
		<comments>http://mg-mk.com/en/ftc-sues-1-800-contacts-over-reciprocal-%e2%80%98anti-competitive%e2%80%99-ppc-bidding-agreements/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Aug 2016 17:12:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[channel: sem]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google: adwords]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google: legal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal: copyright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal: general]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal: regulation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mg-mk.com/en/ftc-sues-1-800-contacts-over-reciprocal-%e2%80%98anti-competitive%e2%80%99-ppc-bidding-agreements/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Bidding agreements prevented 1-800 Contacts and its rivals from bidding on each other's trademarked terms. ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bidding agreements prevented 1-800 Contacts and its rivals from bidding on each other&#8217;s trademarked terms. </p>
<p>Read more:<br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://feeds.searchengineland.com/~r/searchengineland/~3/ZLCLp1n3C-Y/ftc-sues-1-800-contacts-reciprocal-anti-competitive-ppc-bidding-agreements-255395" title="FTC sues 1-800 Contacts over reciprocal, ‘anti-competitive’ PPC bidding agreements">FTC sues 1-800 Contacts over reciprocal, ‘anti-competitive’ PPC bidding agreements</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mg-mk.com/en/ftc-sues-1-800-contacts-over-reciprocal-%e2%80%98anti-competitive%e2%80%99-ppc-bidding-agreements/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google reports more than 40K government requests for user data during 2nd half of 2015</title>
		<link>http://mg-mk.com/en/google-reports-more-than-40k-government-requests-for-user-data-during-2nd-half-of-2015/</link>
		<comments>http://mg-mk.com/en/google-reports-more-than-40k-government-requests-for-user-data-during-2nd-half-of-2015/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jul 2016 15:46:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[channel: consumer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google: outside us]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google: privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google: security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal: general]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal: privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal: security]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mg-mk.com/en/google-reports-more-than-40k-government-requests-for-user-data-during-2nd-half-of-2015/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Google says it is proud its transparency reports have helped "shed light on government surveillance laws and practices" around the world. The post Google reports more than 40K government requests for user data during 2nd half of 2015 appeared first on Search Engine Land. ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google says it is proud its transparency reports have helped &#8220;shed light on government surveillance laws and practices&#8221; around the world. The post Google reports more than 40K government requests for user data during 2nd half of 2015 appeared first on Search Engine Land. </p>
<p>Read more:<br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://feeds.searchengineland.com/~r/searchengineland/~3/JJyASKA4184/google-reports-81k-government-requests-user-data-july-december-2015-254169" title="Google reports more than 40K government requests for user data during 2nd half of 2015">Google reports more than 40K government requests for user data during 2nd half of 2015</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mg-mk.com/en/google-reports-more-than-40k-government-requests-for-user-data-during-2nd-half-of-2015/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Florida court allows Google to be sued by publisher delisted as “pure spam”</title>
		<link>http://mg-mk.com/en/florida-court-allows-google-to-be-sued-by-publisher-delisted-as-%e2%80%9cpure-spam%e2%80%9d/</link>
		<comments>http://mg-mk.com/en/florida-court-allows-google-to-be-sued-by-publisher-delisted-as-%e2%80%9cpure-spam%e2%80%9d/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 May 2016 13:36:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[channel: seo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google: critics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google: legal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google: web search]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal: general]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mg-mk.com/en/florida-court-allows-google-to-be-sued-by-publisher-delisted-as-%e2%80%9cpure-spam%e2%80%9d/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Procedural ruling flies in the face of established legal precedent. The post Florida court allows Google to be sued by publisher delisted as &#8220;pure spam&#8221; appeared first on Search Engine Land]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Procedural ruling flies in the face of established legal precedent. The post Florida court allows Google to be sued by publisher delisted as &#8220;pure spam&#8221; appeared first on Search Engine Land</p>
<p>Originally posted here:<br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://feeds.searchengineland.com/~r/searchengineland/~3/riluLeKzrog/florida-court-allows-google-sued-publisher-delisted-pure-spam-249795" title="Florida court allows Google to be sued by publisher delisted as “pure spam”">Florida court allows Google to be sued by publisher delisted as “pure spam”</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mg-mk.com/en/florida-court-allows-google-to-be-sued-by-publisher-delisted-as-%e2%80%9cpure-spam%e2%80%9d/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>“Illegitimate” SEO Sentenced To 37 Months In Federal Prison For Extortion</title>
		<link>http://mg-mk.com/en/%e2%80%9cillegitimate%e2%80%9d-seo-sentenced-to-37-months-in-federal-prison-for-extortion/</link>
		<comments>http://mg-mk.com/en/%e2%80%9cillegitimate%e2%80%9d-seo-sentenced-to-37-months-in-federal-prison-for-extortion/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jan 2016 14:18:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[alerts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[channel: industry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal: general]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sem industry: general]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[seo: general]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mg-mk.com/en/%e2%80%9cillegitimate%e2%80%9d-seo-sentenced-to-37-months-in-federal-prison-for-extortion/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[An SEO named William Stanley was sentenced to more than three years in prison and ordered to pay $174,888 in fees for SEO extortion. The post &#8220;Illegitimate&#8221; SEO Sentenced To 37 Months In Federal Prison For Extortion appeared first on Search Engine Land. ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>An SEO named William Stanley was sentenced to more than three years in prison and ordered to pay $174,888 in fees for SEO extortion. The post &#8220;Illegitimate&#8221; SEO Sentenced To 37 Months In Federal Prison For Extortion appeared first on Search Engine Land. </p>
<p>Visit link:<br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://feeds.searchengineland.com/~r/searchengineland/~3/kBix9Q6EADw/seo-sentenced-to-37-months-in-federal-prison-for-extortion-239706" title="“Illegitimate” SEO Sentenced To 37 Months In Federal Prison For Extortion">“Illegitimate” SEO Sentenced To 37 Months In Federal Prison For Extortion</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mg-mk.com/en/%e2%80%9cillegitimate%e2%80%9d-seo-sentenced-to-37-months-in-federal-prison-for-extortion/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google Loses Appeal By AdWords Advertisers In Suit Over Ads On Error Pages</title>
		<link>http://mg-mk.com/en/google-loses-appeal-by-adwords-advertisers-in-suit-over-ads-on-error-pages/</link>
		<comments>http://mg-mk.com/en/google-loses-appeal-by-adwords-advertisers-in-suit-over-ads-on-error-pages/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2015 14:51:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[channel: sem]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google: adwords]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google: legal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal: general]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[top news]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mg-mk.com/en/google-loses-appeal-by-adwords-advertisers-in-suit-over-ads-on-error-pages/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ruling overturns lower court denial of class-action status for advertisers, paving the way for plaintiffs to be able to sue as a group. Higher court also sides with advertisers on methods for calculating restitution. The post Google Loses Appeal By AdWords Advertisers In Suit Over Ads On Error..]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ruling overturns lower court denial of class-action status for advertisers, paving the way for plaintiffs to be able to sue as a group. Higher court also sides with advertisers on methods for calculating restitution. The post Google Loses Appeal By AdWords Advertisers In Suit Over Ads On Error..</p>
<p>See original here:<br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://feeds.searchengineland.com/~r/searchengineland/~3/3Q_-61zrlww/google-loses-appeal-by-adwords-advertisers-in-suit-over-ads-on-error-pages-231304" title="Google Loses Appeal By AdWords Advertisers In Suit Over Ads On Error Pages">Google Loses Appeal By AdWords Advertisers In Suit Over Ads On Error Pages</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mg-mk.com/en/google-loses-appeal-by-adwords-advertisers-in-suit-over-ads-on-error-pages/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
