<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>MG Marketing &#187; legal search issues</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mg-mk.com/en/tag/legal-search-issues/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mg-mk.com/en</link>
	<description>Online Marketing Agency</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2026 22:09:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Judge Rules Google Ad Tech Business Won&#8217;t Be Broken Up</title>
		<link>http://mg-mk.com/en/judge-rules-google-ad-tech-business-wont-be-broken-up/</link>
		<comments>http://mg-mk.com/en/judge-rules-google-ad-tech-business-wont-be-broken-up/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2026 15:31:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal search issues]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mg-mk.com/en/judge-rules-google-ad-tech-business-wont-be-broken-up/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A federal judge in Virginia ruled against breaking up Google's ad tech business after Google was found to be a monopoly over its ad technology platforms. The judge ordered Google to end its practices that depress ad rates for web publishers, but declined to order divestiture of Google's ad exchange and other technology.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A federal judge in Virginia ruled against breaking up Google&#8217;s ad tech business after Google was found to be a monopoly over its ad technology platforms. The judge ordered Google to end its practices that depress ad rates for web publishers, but declined to order divestiture of Google&#8217;s ad exchange and other technology.</p>
</p>
<p>Here is the original post:<br />
<a target="_blank" href="https://www.seroundtable.com/google-ad-tech-business-ruling-42008.html" title="Judge Rules Google Ad Tech Business Won't Be Broken Up">Judge Rules Google Ad Tech Business Won&#8217;t Be Broken Up</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mg-mk.com/en/judge-rules-google-ad-tech-business-wont-be-broken-up/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google Amends Lawsuit Against SerpApi Over Licensed Content</title>
		<link>http://mg-mk.com/en/google-amends-lawsuit-against-serpapi-over-licensed-content-2/</link>
		<comments>http://mg-mk.com/en/google-amends-lawsuit-against-serpapi-over-licensed-content-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Aug 2026 11:41:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal search issues]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mg-mk.com/en/google-amends-lawsuit-against-serpapi-over-licensed-content-2/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[After Google's lawsuit against SerpAPI, the Google Search scraper tool, was dismissed a month ago, Google has decided to amend the complaint. Google filed the amendment on August 10, 2026 as an "Amended Complaint." Google is now taking an approach around protecting licensed content within its search results.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After Google&#8217;s lawsuit against SerpAPI, the Google Search scraper tool, was dismissed a month ago, Google has decided to amend the complaint. Google filed the amendment on August 10, 2026 as an &#8220;Amended Complaint.&#8221; Google is now taking an approach around protecting licensed content within its search results.</p>
</p>
<p>Here is the original post:<br />
<a target="_blank" href="https://www.seroundtable.com/google-amends-lawsuit-against-serpapi-41860.html" title="Google Amends Lawsuit Against SerpApi Over Licensed Content">Google Amends Lawsuit Against SerpApi Over Licensed Content</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mg-mk.com/en/google-amends-lawsuit-against-serpapi-over-licensed-content-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google Amends Lawsuit Against SerpApi Over Licensed Content</title>
		<link>http://mg-mk.com/en/google-amends-lawsuit-against-serpapi-over-licensed-content/</link>
		<comments>http://mg-mk.com/en/google-amends-lawsuit-against-serpapi-over-licensed-content/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Aug 2026 11:41:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal search issues]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mg-mk.com/en/google-amends-lawsuit-against-serpapi-over-licensed-content/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[After Google's lawsuit against SerpAPI, the Google Search scraper tool, was dismissed a month ago, Google has decided to amend the complaint. Google filed the amendment on August 10, 2026 as an "Amended Complaint." Google is now taking an approach around protecting licensed content within its search results.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After Google&#8217;s lawsuit against SerpAPI, the Google Search scraper tool, was dismissed a month ago, Google has decided to amend the complaint. Google filed the amendment on August 10, 2026 as an &#8220;Amended Complaint.&#8221; Google is now taking an approach around protecting licensed content within its search results.</p>
</p>
<p>View post:<br />
<a target="_blank" href="https://www.seroundtable.com/google-amends-lawsuit-against-serpapi-41860.html" title="Google Amends Lawsuit Against SerpApi Over Licensed Content">Google Amends Lawsuit Against SerpApi Over Licensed Content</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mg-mk.com/en/google-amends-lawsuit-against-serpapi-over-licensed-content/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>FTX Sued Neil Patel For Millions</title>
		<link>http://mg-mk.com/en/ftx-sued-neil-patel-for-millions/</link>
		<comments>http://mg-mk.com/en/ftx-sued-neil-patel-for-millions/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2025 11:21:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal search issues]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mg-mk.com/en/ftx-sued-neil-patel-for-millions/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Cyrus Shepard posted about how FTX, you know, the company Sam Bankman-Fried ran, is now suing Neil Patel and his company, for $55 million. There are a ton of whoppers in this lawsuit, and I have no idea who is right or wrong here, but as Cyrus noted, Neil Patel went through lots of efforts to hide this in the Google search results.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cyrus Shepard posted about how FTX, you know, the company Sam Bankman-Fried ran, is now suing Neil Patel and his company, for $55 million. There are a ton of whoppers in this lawsuit, and I have no idea who is right or wrong here, but as Cyrus noted, Neil Patel went through lots of efforts to hide this in the Google search results.</p>
</p>
<p>Link:<br />
<a target="_blank" href="https://www.seroundtable.com/ftx-sues-neil-patel-for-55-million-39539.html" title="FTX Sued Neil Patel For Millions">FTX Sued Neil Patel For Millions</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mg-mk.com/en/ftx-sued-neil-patel-for-millions/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
