<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>MG Marketing &#187; legal: trademarks</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mg-mk.com/en/tag/legal-trademarks/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mg-mk.com/en</link>
	<description>Online Marketing Agency</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2026 22:10:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Keyword infringement: Edible Arrangements files $209M trademark suit against Google</title>
		<link>http://mg-mk.com/en/keyword-infringement-edible-arrangements-files-209m-trademark-suit-against-google/</link>
		<comments>http://mg-mk.com/en/keyword-infringement-edible-arrangements-files-209m-trademark-suit-against-google/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Feb 2018 20:26:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[channel: sem]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google: adwords]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google: legal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal: trademarks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mg-mk.com/en/keyword-infringement-edible-arrangements-files-209m-trademark-suit-against-google/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[While use of trademarked keywords has been allowed by courts, this case may be more complicated than it seems on the surface. The post Keyword infringement: Edible Arrangements files $209M trademark suit against Google appeared first on Search Engine Land. Please visit Search Engine Land for the full article. ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While use of trademarked keywords has been allowed by courts, this case may be more complicated than it seems on the surface. The post Keyword infringement: Edible Arrangements files $209M trademark suit against Google appeared first on Search Engine Land. Please visit Search Engine Land for the full article. </p>
<p>View post:<br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://feeds.searchengineland.com/~r/searchengineland/~3/hRvNftQtfB0/edible-arrangements-files-209-trademark-suit-google-292423" title="Keyword infringement: Edible Arrangements files $209M trademark suit against Google">Keyword infringement: Edible Arrangements files $209M trademark suit against Google</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mg-mk.com/en/keyword-infringement-edible-arrangements-files-209m-trademark-suit-against-google/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Initial Interest Confusion rears its ugly head once more in trademark infringement case</title>
		<link>http://mg-mk.com/en/initial-interest-confusion-rears-its-ugly-head-once-more-in-trademark-infringement-case/</link>
		<comments>http://mg-mk.com/en/initial-interest-confusion-rears-its-ugly-head-once-more-in-trademark-infringement-case/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 May 2017 16:02:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[all things seo column]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[amazon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[channel: seo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal: general]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal: trademarks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search marketing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mg-mk.com/en/initial-interest-confusion-rears-its-ugly-head-once-more-in-trademark-infringement-case/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Columnist Chris Silver Smith details recent trademark infringement cases in which site search results pages caused legal issues for retailer sites. E-commerce businesses should take notice! The post Initial Interest Confusion rears its ugly head once more in trademark infringement case appeared... Please visit Search Engine Land for the full article]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Columnist Chris Silver Smith details recent trademark infringement cases in which site search results pages caused legal issues for retailer sites. E-commerce businesses should take notice! The post Initial Interest Confusion rears its ugly head once more in trademark infringement case appeared&#8230; Please visit Search Engine Land for the full article</p>
<p>Here is the original post:<br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://feeds.searchengineland.com/~r/searchengineland/~3/JtbdMsVcOeo/initial-interest-confusion-rears-ugly-head-trademark-infringement-case-e-commerce-sites-take-notice-275125" title="Initial Interest Confusion rears its ugly head once more in trademark infringement case">Initial Interest Confusion rears its ugly head once more in trademark infringement case</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mg-mk.com/en/initial-interest-confusion-rears-its-ugly-head-once-more-in-trademark-infringement-case/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mississippi attorney general’s “conspiracy to censor the internet” back on as appeals court rules against Google</title>
		<link>http://mg-mk.com/en/mississippi-attorney-general%e2%80%99s-%e2%80%9cconspiracy-to-censor-the-internet%e2%80%9d-back-on-as-appeals-court-rules-against-google/</link>
		<comments>http://mg-mk.com/en/mississippi-attorney-general%e2%80%99s-%e2%80%9cconspiracy-to-censor-the-internet%e2%80%9d-back-on-as-appeals-court-rules-against-google/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Apr 2016 14:46:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[channel: seo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google: critics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google: legal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google: seo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal: censorship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal: copyright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal: trademarks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mg-mk.com/en/mississippi-attorney-general%e2%80%99s-%e2%80%9cconspiracy-to-censor-the-internet%e2%80%9d-back-on-as-appeals-court-rules-against-google/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Google had alleged the Motion Picture Association of America was using Mississippi attorney general's action as a tool of its private interests in content takedowns. The post Mississippi attorney general’s “conspiracy to censor the internet&#8221; back on as appeals court rules against Google..]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google had alleged the Motion Picture Association of America was using Mississippi attorney general&#8217;s action as a tool of its private interests in content takedowns. The post Mississippi attorney general’s “conspiracy to censor the internet&#8221; back on as appeals court rules against Google..</p>
<p>The rest is here:<br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://feeds.searchengineland.com/~r/searchengineland/~3/O98tUiLaEmo/mississippi-attorney-generals-conspiracy-censor-internet-back-appeals-court-rules-google-247009" title="Mississippi attorney general’s “conspiracy to censor the internet” back on as appeals court rules against Google">Mississippi attorney general’s “conspiracy to censor the internet” back on as appeals court rules against Google</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mg-mk.com/en/mississippi-attorney-general%e2%80%99s-%e2%80%9cconspiracy-to-censor-the-internet%e2%80%9d-back-on-as-appeals-court-rules-against-google/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Brand bidding &amp; PPC optimization: enforcement options (Part 6 of 8)</title>
		<link>http://mg-mk.com/en/brand-bidding-ppc-optimization-enforcement-options-part-6-of-8/</link>
		<comments>http://mg-mk.com/en/brand-bidding-ppc-optimization-enforcement-options-part-6-of-8/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Apr 2016 14:26:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[channel: sem]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal: copyright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal: trademarks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[paid search column]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search ads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search ads: general]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search marketing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mg-mk.com/en/brand-bidding-ppc-optimization-enforcement-options-part-6-of-8/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In part 6 of her multi-part series on brand bidding for paid search, columnist Lori Weiman breaks down the legal issues surrounding trademark infringement in paid search ads. The post Brand bidding &#038; PPC optimization: enforcement options (Part 6 of 8) appeared first on Search Engine Land. ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In part 6 of her multi-part series on brand bidding for paid search, columnist Lori Weiman breaks down the legal issues surrounding trademark infringement in paid search ads. The post Brand bidding &#038; PPC optimization: enforcement options (Part 6 of <img src='http://mg-mk.com/en/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_cool.gif' alt='8)' class='wp-smiley' /> appeared first on Search Engine Land. </p>
<p>View post:<br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://feeds.searchengineland.com/~r/searchengineland/~3/gJTOJYLoO8g/brand-bidding-ppc-optimization-enforcement-options-part-6-8-246044" title="Brand bidding &amp; PPC optimization: enforcement options (Part 6 of 8)">Brand bidding &amp; PPC optimization: enforcement options (Part 6 of <img src='http://mg-mk.com/en/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_cool.gif' alt='8)' class='wp-smiley' /> </a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mg-mk.com/en/brand-bidding-ppc-optimization-enforcement-options-part-6-of-8/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why You Don’t See “World Cup” Ads On Google</title>
		<link>http://mg-mk.com/en/why-you-don%e2%80%99t-see-%e2%80%9cworld-cup%e2%80%9d-ads-on-google/</link>
		<comments>http://mg-mk.com/en/why-you-don%e2%80%99t-see-%e2%80%9cworld-cup%e2%80%9d-ads-on-google/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Jun 2014 13:12:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[channel: consumer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google: adwords]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal: trademarks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search ads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[top news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[world cup advertsing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mg-mk.com/en/why-you-don%e2%80%99t-see-%e2%80%9cworld-cup%e2%80%9d-ads-on-google/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Google is on the cusp of a search volume siege from soccer (aka football) fans as the 2014 FIFA World Cup™ nears. A look at Google Trends data shows we&#8217;re on the upswing what Google can expect when the tournament starts on June 12, based on the volumes the last two times the World Cup was... Please visit Search Engine Land for the full article]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google is on the cusp of a search volume siege from soccer (aka football) fans as the 2014 FIFA World Cup™ nears. A look at Google Trends data shows we&#8217;re on the upswing what Google can expect when the tournament starts on June 12, based on the volumes the last two times the World Cup was&#8230; Please visit Search Engine Land for the full article</p>
<p>Go here to see the original:<br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://feeds.searchengineland.com/~r/searchengineland/~3/9iVPdlAKXxQ/dont-see-world-cup-ads-google-2-193534" title="Why You Don’t See “World Cup” Ads On Google">Why You Don’t See “World Cup” Ads On Google</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mg-mk.com/en/why-you-don%e2%80%99t-see-%e2%80%9cworld-cup%e2%80%9d-ads-on-google/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Despite Google’s Efforts, Counterfeiters Are Commonplace On AdWords</title>
		<link>http://mg-mk.com/en/despite-google%e2%80%99s-efforts-counterfeiters-are-commonplace-on-adwords/</link>
		<comments>http://mg-mk.com/en/despite-google%e2%80%99s-efforts-counterfeiters-are-commonplace-on-adwords/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 May 2014 13:28:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[channel: sem]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google ads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google: adwords]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google: legal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal: copyright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal: trademarks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[paid search column]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mg-mk.com/en/despite-google%e2%80%99s-efforts-counterfeiters-are-commonplace-on-adwords/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Should a company that includes the phrase &#8220;don&#8217;t be evil&#8221; in their code of conduct be expected to block counterfeiters from buying ads on their search engine result pages? Is it &#8220;evil&#8221; to sell AdWords to websites that are filled with copyright infringing photos? These... Please visit Search Engine Land for the full article. ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Should a company that includes the phrase &#8220;don&#8217;t be evil&#8221; in their code of conduct be expected to block counterfeiters from buying ads on their search engine result pages? Is it &#8220;evil&#8221; to sell AdWords to websites that are filled with copyright infringing photos? These&#8230; Please visit Search Engine Land for the full article. </p>
<p>Read the original:<br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://feeds.searchengineland.com/~r/searchengineland/~3/OTlR4j94SEA/counterfeiters-commonplace-google-187810" title="Despite Google’s Efforts, Counterfeiters Are Commonplace On AdWords">Despite Google’s Efforts, Counterfeiters Are Commonplace On AdWords</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mg-mk.com/en/despite-google%e2%80%99s-efforts-counterfeiters-are-commonplace-on-adwords/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google Gets Trademark Reprieve In Sweden Over Definition Of ‘Ungoogleable’</title>
		<link>http://mg-mk.com/en/google-gets-trademark-reprieve-in-sweden-over-definition-of-%e2%80%98ungoogleable%e2%80%99/</link>
		<comments>http://mg-mk.com/en/google-gets-trademark-reprieve-in-sweden-over-definition-of-%e2%80%98ungoogleable%e2%80%99/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Mar 2013 19:09:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google: legal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google: outside us]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal: trademarks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sweden]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[top news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trademark]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trademark law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ungoogleable]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mg-mk.com/en/google-gets-trademark-reprieve-in-sweden-over-definition-of-%e2%80%98ungoogleable%e2%80%99/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;Ungoogleable&#8221; won&#8217;t become an official word in Sweden &#8230; at least, not this year. As Sveriges Radio reports (found via The Verge), the Language Council of Sweden won&#8217;t be adding ogooglebar, which translates to &#8220;ungoogleable,&#8221; to its official list of new..]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Ungoogleable&#8221; won&#8217;t become an official word in Sweden &#8230; at least, not this year. As Sveriges Radio reports (found via The Verge), the Language Council of Sweden won&#8217;t be adding ogooglebar, which translates to &#8220;ungoogleable,&#8221; to its official list of new..</p>
<p>See original here:<br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://feeds.searchengineland.com/~r/searchengineland/~3/q3eIq6vdwi0/google-trademark-sweden-ungoogleable-153133" title="Google Gets Trademark Reprieve In Sweden Over Definition Of ‘Ungoogleable’">Google Gets Trademark Reprieve In Sweden Over Definition Of ‘Ungoogleable’</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mg-mk.com/en/google-gets-trademark-reprieve-in-sweden-over-definition-of-%e2%80%98ungoogleable%e2%80%99/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google Streamlines AdWords Rules On Using Trademark Keywords</title>
		<link>http://mg-mk.com/en/google-streamlines-adwords-rules-on-using-trademark-keywords/</link>
		<comments>http://mg-mk.com/en/google-streamlines-adwords-rules-on-using-trademark-keywords/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Mar 2013 15:10:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bidding on trademarks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google: adwords]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google: legal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal: trademarks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ppc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trademark terms]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mg-mk.com/en/google-streamlines-adwords-rules-on-using-trademark-keywords/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Google has announced an update to its AdWords trademark policy that streamlines the rules on using third-party trademark keywords in campaigns. With the update, Google now has a consistent global policy that allows advertisers to bid on competitor third-party trademark keywords. ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google has announced an update to its AdWords trademark policy that streamlines the rules on using third-party trademark keywords in campaigns. With the update, Google now has a consistent global policy that allows advertisers to bid on competitor third-party trademark keywords. </p>
<p>Visit link:<br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://feeds.searchengineland.com/~r/searchengineland/~3/qbjdjgpl1kA/google-streamline-adwords-rules-on-using-trademark-keywords-152907" title="Google Streamlines AdWords Rules On Using Trademark Keywords">Google Streamlines AdWords Rules On Using Trademark Keywords</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mg-mk.com/en/google-streamlines-adwords-rules-on-using-trademark-keywords/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google Transparency Report Now Showing False Takedown Requests</title>
		<link>http://mg-mk.com/en/google-transparency-report-now-showing-false-takedown-requests/</link>
		<comments>http://mg-mk.com/en/google-transparency-report-now-showing-false-takedown-requests/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2012 19:48:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google: pirate update]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google: seo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google: web search]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal: censorship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal: copyright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal: trademarks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mg-mk.com/en/google-transparency-report-now-showing-false-takedown-requests/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[TorrentFreak reports that Google updated their transparency report to now show the number and specific details on the false takedown requests attempted. You can see this level of detail by going to a specific takedown request. For example, looking at takedown request ID 266534 shows that of the 886... ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>TorrentFreak reports that Google updated their transparency report to now show the number and specific details on the false takedown requests attempted. You can see this level of detail by going to a specific takedown request. For example, looking at takedown request ID 266534 shows that of the 886&#8230; </p>
<p>More here:<br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://feeds.searchengineland.com/~r/searchengineland/~3/R3Zqlaek67s/google-transparency-report-now-showing-false-takedown-requests-142446" title="Google Transparency Report Now Showing False Takedown Requests">Google Transparency Report Now Showing False Takedown Requests</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mg-mk.com/en/google-transparency-report-now-showing-false-takedown-requests/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google And Rosetta Stone Agree To Settle Suit Over Trademarked Keywords</title>
		<link>http://mg-mk.com/en/google-and-rosetta-stone-agree-to-settle-suit-over-trademarked-keywords/</link>
		<comments>http://mg-mk.com/en/google-and-rosetta-stone-agree-to-settle-suit-over-trademarked-keywords/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2012 14:10:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google: adwords]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google: legal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal: trademarks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mg-mk.com/en/google-and-rosetta-stone-agree-to-settle-suit-over-trademarked-keywords/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[One of Google&#8217;s most well-funded and tenacious opponents in the legal arena, Rosetta Stone, has agreed to settle its trademark suit against the search giant. ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One of Google&#8217;s most well-funded and tenacious opponents in the legal arena, Rosetta Stone, has agreed to settle its trademark suit against the search giant. </p>
<p>Read the original post:<br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://feeds.searchengineland.com/~r/searchengineland/~3/eiKu31m3MNQ/google-and-rosetta-stone-agree-to-settle-suit-over-trademarked-keywords-138421" title="Google And Rosetta Stone Agree To Settle Suit Over Trademarked Keywords">Google And Rosetta Stone Agree To Settle Suit Over Trademarked Keywords</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mg-mk.com/en/google-and-rosetta-stone-agree-to-settle-suit-over-trademarked-keywords/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
