<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>MG Marketing &#187; legal</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mg-mk.com/en/tag/legal/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mg-mk.com/en</link>
	<description>Online Marketing Agency</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2026 10:15:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Google rolls out new ID requirements for US political ads</title>
		<link>http://mg-mk.com/en/google-rolls-out-new-id-requirements-for-us-political-ads/</link>
		<comments>http://mg-mk.com/en/google-rolls-out-new-id-requirements-for-us-political-ads/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 May 2018 16:26:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[channel: sem]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google: legal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google: privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal: privacy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mg-mk.com/en/google-rolls-out-new-id-requirements-for-us-political-ads/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Due to increased scrutiny of how these ads affect users and voters, company says more transparency intiatives are to come. ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Due to increased scrutiny of how these ads affect users and voters, company says more transparency intiatives are to come. </p>
<p>Read the rest here:<br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://feeds.searchengineland.com/~r/searchengineland/~3/nMQMgeHbA3U/google-rolls-out-new-id-requirements-for-us-political-ads-297530" title="Google rolls out new ID requirements for US political ads">Google rolls out new ID requirements for US political ads</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mg-mk.com/en/google-rolls-out-new-id-requirements-for-us-political-ads/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google involved in Supreme Court case that may change class-action damages awards</title>
		<link>http://mg-mk.com/en/google-involved-in-supreme-court-case-that-may-change-class-action-damages-awards/</link>
		<comments>http://mg-mk.com/en/google-involved-in-supreme-court-case-that-may-change-class-action-damages-awards/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 May 2018 13:13:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[alphabet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[channel: seo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google: critics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google: legal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google: web search]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal: general]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal: privacy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mg-mk.com/en/google-involved-in-supreme-court-case-that-may-change-class-action-damages-awards/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The question before the court involves 'cy-près' and whether it was OK for plaintiffs' attorneys to allocate settlement money to their own law schools. The post Google involved in Supreme Court case that may change class-action damages awards appeared first on Search Engine Land]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The question before the court involves &#8216;cy-près&#8217; and whether it was OK for plaintiffs&#8217; attorneys to allocate settlement money to their own law schools. The post Google involved in Supreme Court case that may change class-action damages awards appeared first on Search Engine Land</p>
<p>Read this article:<br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://feeds.searchengineland.com/~r/searchengineland/~3/QI8Xctn80BE/google-involved-in-supreme-court-case-that-may-change-class-action-damages-awards-297232" title="Google involved in Supreme Court case that may change class-action damages awards">Google involved in Supreme Court case that may change class-action damages awards</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mg-mk.com/en/google-involved-in-supreme-court-case-that-may-change-class-action-damages-awards/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google loses ‘right to be forgotten’ case in UK High Court</title>
		<link>http://mg-mk.com/en/google-loses-%e2%80%98right-to-be-forgotten%e2%80%99-case-in-uk-high-court/</link>
		<comments>http://mg-mk.com/en/google-loses-%e2%80%98right-to-be-forgotten%e2%80%99-case-in-uk-high-court/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Apr 2018 16:53:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google: critics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google: legal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google: outside us]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal: privacy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mg-mk.com/en/google-loses-%e2%80%98right-to-be-forgotten%e2%80%99-case-in-uk-high-court/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Decision likely to spark other appeals to courts by those denied de-listing. The post Google loses &#8216;right to be forgotten&#8217; case in UK High Court appeared first on Search Engine Land. Please visit Search Engine Land for the full article. ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Decision likely to spark other appeals to courts by those denied de-listing. The post Google loses &#8216;right to be forgotten&#8217; case in UK High Court appeared first on Search Engine Land. Please visit Search Engine Land for the full article. </p>
<p>Read the original here:<br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://feeds.searchengineland.com/~r/searchengineland/~3/USFeXM5fQj4/google-loses-right-to-be-forgotten-case-in-uk-high-court-296251" title="Google loses ‘right to be forgotten’ case in UK High Court">Google loses ‘right to be forgotten’ case in UK High Court</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mg-mk.com/en/google-loses-%e2%80%98right-to-be-forgotten%e2%80%99-case-in-uk-high-court/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Facebook &amp; Cambridge Analytica: What we know, what they knew &amp; where that leaves us</title>
		<link>http://mg-mk.com/en/facebook-cambridge-analytica-what-we-know-what-they-knew-where-that-leaves-us/</link>
		<comments>http://mg-mk.com/en/facebook-cambridge-analytica-what-we-know-what-they-knew-where-that-leaves-us/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Apr 2018 19:30:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[channel: sem]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal: privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal: regulation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal: security]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mg-mk.com/en/facebook-cambridge-analytica-what-we-know-what-they-knew-where-that-leaves-us/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A brief history of the many privacy disasters at the world's dominant social media platform, and what the most recent data exposure means for marketers, and other data Borg as Facebook's CEO faces Congress. The post Facebook &#038; Cambridge Analytica: What we know, what they knew &#038; where... ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A brief history of the many privacy disasters at the world&#8217;s dominant social media platform, and what the most recent data exposure means for marketers, and other data Borg as Facebook&#8217;s CEO faces Congress. The post Facebook &#038; Cambridge Analytica: What we know, what they knew &#038; where&#8230; </p>
<p>Read more:<br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://feeds.searchengineland.com/~r/searchengineland/~3/njmY3qVnsvo/facebook-cambridge-analytica-what-we-know-what-they-knew-where-that-leaves-us-296107" title="Facebook &amp; Cambridge Analytica: What we know, what they knew &amp; where that leaves us">Facebook &amp; Cambridge Analytica: What we know, what they knew &amp; where that leaves us</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mg-mk.com/en/facebook-cambridge-analytica-what-we-know-what-they-knew-where-that-leaves-us/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>To comply with GDPR, Google asks publishers to manage user-data consent for ad targeting in EU</title>
		<link>http://mg-mk.com/en/to-comply-with-gdpr-google-asks-publishers-to-manage-user-data-consent-for-ad-targeting-in-eu/</link>
		<comments>http://mg-mk.com/en/to-comply-with-gdpr-google-asks-publishers-to-manage-user-data-consent-for-ad-targeting-in-eu/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Mar 2018 13:28:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[channel: sem]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google adsense]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google: adwords]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google: outside us]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal: privacy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mg-mk.com/en/to-comply-with-gdpr-google-asks-publishers-to-manage-user-data-consent-for-ad-targeting-in-eu/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Publishers are being asked to manage the consent process on behalf of Google. The post To comply with GDPR, Google asks publishers to manage user-data consent for ad targeting in EU appeared first on Search Engine Land. Please visit Search Engine Land for the full article. ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Publishers are being asked to manage the consent process on behalf of Google. The post To comply with GDPR, Google asks publishers to manage user-data consent for ad targeting in EU appeared first on Search Engine Land. Please visit Search Engine Land for the full article. </p>
<p>Excerpt from:<br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://feeds.searchengineland.com/~r/searchengineland/~3/GpRLzs90ZVg/report-google-asks-publishers-to-manage-user-data-consent-for-ad-targeting-in-eu-gdpr-294917" title="To comply with GDPR, Google asks publishers to manage user-data consent for ad targeting in EU">To comply with GDPR, Google asks publishers to manage user-data consent for ad targeting in EU</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mg-mk.com/en/to-comply-with-gdpr-google-asks-publishers-to-manage-user-data-consent-for-ad-targeting-in-eu/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Report: EU to ask Google, others to publicly reveal ranking factors</title>
		<link>http://mg-mk.com/en/report-eu-to-ask-google-others-to-publicly-reveal-ranking-factors/</link>
		<comments>http://mg-mk.com/en/report-eu-to-ask-google-others-to-publicly-reveal-ranking-factors/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2018 14:22:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google: legal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google: outside us]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google: seo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google: web search]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal: regulation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mg-mk.com/en/report-eu-to-ask-google-others-to-publicly-reveal-ranking-factors/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Proposed rules are designed to redress the “superior bargaining power” of the large internet brands. The post Report: EU to ask Google, others to publicly reveal ranking factors appeared first on Search Engine Land. Please visit Search Engine Land for the full article]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Proposed rules are designed to redress the “superior bargaining power” of the large internet brands. The post Report: EU to ask Google, others to publicly reveal ranking factors appeared first on Search Engine Land. Please visit Search Engine Land for the full article</p>
<p>See more here:<br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://feeds.searchengineland.com/~r/searchengineland/~3/3X7aOtl_GJ8/report-eu-ask-google-others-publicly-reveal-ranking-factors-294233" title="Report: EU to ask Google, others to publicly reveal ranking factors">Report: EU to ask Google, others to publicly reveal ranking factors</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mg-mk.com/en/report-eu-to-ask-google-others-to-publicly-reveal-ranking-factors/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google’s antitrust infringement continues ‘unabated’, Google Shopping competitors tell European Commission</title>
		<link>http://mg-mk.com/en/google%e2%80%99s-antitrust-infringement-continues-%e2%80%98unabated%e2%80%99-google-shopping-competitors-tell-european-commission/</link>
		<comments>http://mg-mk.com/en/google%e2%80%99s-antitrust-infringement-continues-%e2%80%98unabated%e2%80%99-google-shopping-competitors-tell-european-commission/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Mar 2018 19:10:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[channel: sem]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google: antitrust]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google: google shopping]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google: legal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal: regulation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mg-mk.com/en/google%e2%80%99s-antitrust-infringement-continues-%e2%80%98unabated%e2%80%99-google-shopping-competitors-tell-european-commission/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Four months in, 19 rivals say too little has changed. The post Google&#8217;s antitrust infringement continues &#8216;unabated&#8217;, Google Shopping competitors tell European Commission appeared first on Search Engine Land. Please visit Search Engine Land for the full article]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Four months in, 19 rivals say too little has changed. The post Google&#8217;s antitrust infringement continues &#8216;unabated&#8217;, Google Shopping competitors tell European Commission appeared first on Search Engine Land. Please visit Search Engine Land for the full article</p>
<p>Follow this link:<br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://feeds.searchengineland.com/~r/searchengineland/~3/IdBjAJ2tisE/googles-antitrust-infringement-continues-unabated-google-shopping-competitors-tell-european-commission-293273" title="Google’s antitrust infringement continues ‘unabated’, Google Shopping competitors tell European Commission">Google’s antitrust infringement continues ‘unabated’, Google Shopping competitors tell European Commission</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mg-mk.com/en/google%e2%80%99s-antitrust-infringement-continues-%e2%80%98unabated%e2%80%99-google-shopping-competitors-tell-european-commission/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>German court: Google has no ‘duty to inspect’ websites for illegal content before displaying</title>
		<link>http://mg-mk.com/en/german-court-google-has-no-%e2%80%98duty-to-inspect%e2%80%99-websites-for-illegal-content-before-displaying/</link>
		<comments>http://mg-mk.com/en/german-court-google-has-no-%e2%80%98duty-to-inspect%e2%80%99-websites-for-illegal-content-before-displaying/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Feb 2018 14:26:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[channel: seo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google: critics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google: legal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google: outside us]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google: privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google: seo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google: web search]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal: privacy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mg-mk.com/en/german-court-google-has-no-%e2%80%98duty-to-inspect%e2%80%99-websites-for-illegal-content-before-displaying/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The court held that Google can't be held liable before being notified of a 'clearly recognizable violation' of individual rights. The post German court: Google has no &#8216;duty to inspect&#8217; websites for illegal content before displaying appeared first on Search Engine Land]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The court held that Google can&#8217;t be held liable before being notified of a &#8216;clearly recognizable violation&#8217; of individual rights. The post German court: Google has no &#8216;duty to inspect&#8217; websites for illegal content before displaying appeared first on Search Engine Land</p>
<p>Continue reading here:<br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://feeds.searchengineland.com/~r/searchengineland/~3/7SMYNBqjggg/german-court-google-no-duty-inspect-websites-illegal-content-displaying-293125" title="German court: Google has no ‘duty to inspect’ websites for illegal content before displaying">German court: Google has no ‘duty to inspect’ websites for illegal content before displaying</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mg-mk.com/en/german-court-google-has-no-%e2%80%98duty-to-inspect%e2%80%99-websites-for-illegal-content-before-displaying/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>In response to EU antitrust ruling, Google Shopping now shows ads from competing shopping engines</title>
		<link>http://mg-mk.com/en/in-response-to-eu-antitrust-ruling-google-shopping-now-shows-ads-from-competing-shopping-engines/</link>
		<comments>http://mg-mk.com/en/in-response-to-eu-antitrust-ruling-google-shopping-now-shows-ads-from-competing-shopping-engines/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Feb 2018 17:03:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[channel: retail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google: adwords]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google: antitrust]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google: legal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google: outside us]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal: regulation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mg-mk.com/en/in-response-to-eu-antitrust-ruling-google-shopping-now-shows-ads-from-competing-shopping-engines/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Comparison Shopping Engines are competing with Google for visibility in Google Shopping in the EU. The post In response to EU antitrust ruling, Google Shopping now shows ads from competing shopping engines appeared first on Search Engine Land. Please visit Search Engine Land for the full article. ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Comparison Shopping Engines are competing with Google for visibility in Google Shopping in the EU. The post In response to EU antitrust ruling, Google Shopping now shows ads from competing shopping engines appeared first on Search Engine Land. Please visit Search Engine Land for the full article. </p>
<p>Continued here:<br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://feeds.searchengineland.com/~r/searchengineland/~3/DZnHffFCrrg/response-eu-antitrust-ruling-google-shopping-now-showing-ads-competing-cses-293059" title="In response to EU antitrust ruling, Google Shopping now shows ads from competing shopping engines">In response to EU antitrust ruling, Google Shopping now shows ads from competing shopping engines</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mg-mk.com/en/in-response-to-eu-antitrust-ruling-google-shopping-now-shows-ads-from-competing-shopping-engines/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>NY federal court decision threatens embedding and linking across the web</title>
		<link>http://mg-mk.com/en/ny-federal-court-decision-threatens-embedding-and-linking-across-the-web/</link>
		<comments>http://mg-mk.com/en/ny-federal-court-decision-threatens-embedding-and-linking-across-the-web/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Feb 2018 21:14:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[channel: seo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[channel: social]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal: copyright]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mg-mk.com/en/ny-federal-court-decision-threatens-embedding-and-linking-across-the-web/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The judge's decision disregards existing law and if upheld could expose bloggers and publishers to potential copyright lawsuits. The post NY federal court decision threatens embedding and linking across the web appeared first on Search Engine Land. Please visit Search Engine Land for the full article. ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The judge&#8217;s decision disregards existing law and if upheld could expose bloggers and publishers to potential copyright lawsuits. The post NY federal court decision threatens embedding and linking across the web appeared first on Search Engine Land. Please visit Search Engine Land for the full article. </p>
<p>Link:<br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://feeds.searchengineland.com/~r/searchengineland/~3/tXbVkAOvARk/ny-federal-court-decision-threatens-embedding-linking-across-web-292324" title="NY federal court decision threatens embedding and linking across the web">NY federal court decision threatens embedding and linking across the web</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mg-mk.com/en/ny-federal-court-decision-threatens-embedding-and-linking-across-the-web/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
