<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>MG Marketing &#187; monthly active users</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mg-mk.com/en/tag/monthly-active-users/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mg-mk.com/en</link>
	<description>Online Marketing Agency</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2026 22:10:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>24 slightly depressing stats on the fall of Twitter</title>
		<link>http://mg-mk.com/en/24-slightly-depressing-stats-on-the-fall-of-twitter/</link>
		<comments>http://mg-mk.com/en/24-slightly-depressing-stats-on-the-fall-of-twitter/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Apr 2016 13:38:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[instagram]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[monthly active users]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[more news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[revenue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[twitter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mg-mk.com/en/24-slightly-depressing-stats-on-the-fall-of-twitter/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ Despite its die-hard loyal user base, Twitter has been doing nothing but rubbing its fans up the wrong way for the last 12 months. Whether its been the adoption of a dreaded algorithm, a mooted 10,000 character increase , the killing of its share counts , the pointlessness of &#8216;Moments&#8217;, heck even changing its &#8216;favourite&#8217; button from a star to a heart was a massive thing , there&#8217;s a good chance that if you log-in to Twitter you&#8217;ll find people kicking-off about Twitter. Much of this is down to the very fact that its users, especially its long-term ones who rode the crest of its initial popularity, are so loyal to the channel and don&#8217;t want to see it mutated beyond its unique purpose: serving concise sound-bites and sharing links in real-time]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> Despite its die-hard loyal user base, Twitter has been doing nothing but rubbing its fans up the wrong way for the last 12 months. Whether its been the adoption of a dreaded algorithm, a mooted 10,000 character increase , the killing of its share counts , the pointlessness of &#8216;Moments&#8217;, heck even changing its &#8216;favourite&#8217; button from a star to a heart was a massive thing , there&#8217;s a good chance that if you log-in to Twitter you&#8217;ll find people kicking-off about Twitter. Much of this is down to the very fact that its users, especially its long-term ones who rode the crest of its initial popularity, are so loyal to the channel and don&#8217;t want to see it mutated beyond its unique purpose: serving concise sound-bites and sharing links in real-time</p>
<p>Here is the original post:<br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://feeds.searchenginewatch.com/~r/sewblog/~3/-G0xzVZmjyE/" title="24 slightly depressing stats on the fall of Twitter">24 slightly depressing stats on the fall of Twitter</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mg-mk.com/en/24-slightly-depressing-stats-on-the-fall-of-twitter/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
