<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>MG Marketing &#187; rankings</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mg-mk.com/en/tag/rankings/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mg-mk.com/en</link>
	<description>Online Marketing Agency</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2026 13:30:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>SEO 101: Are You Being Outranked by Your Own Content? by @dariozadro</title>
		<link>http://mg-mk.com/en/seo-101-are-you-being-outranked-by-your-own-content-by-dariozadro/</link>
		<comments>http://mg-mk.com/en/seo-101-are-you-being-outranked-by-your-own-content-by-dariozadro/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 May 2014 11:39:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rankings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scraper sites]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[seo 101]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mg-mk.com/en/seo-101-are-you-being-outranked-by-your-own-content-by-dariozadro/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ Unique, and original, content drives the Internet (so we’re constantly told), and we SEOs spend much of of our time producing and honing that content in the hopes of making the all mighty Google happy as a clam. Unfortunately, there has always been an ongoing problem with spammy websites lifting existing content verbatim, and passing it off as their own creation. These scraper sites not only devalue the original content they have stolen, but they can also impact the page rankings of the original page]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> Unique, and original, content drives the Internet (so we’re constantly told), and we SEOs spend much of of our time producing and honing that content in the hopes of making the all mighty Google happy as a clam. Unfortunately, there has always been an ongoing problem with spammy websites lifting existing content verbatim, and passing it off as their own creation. These scraper sites not only devalue the original content they have stolen, but they can also impact the page rankings of the original page</p>
<p>Read the original here:<br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/SearchEngineJournal/~3/uAliRnxEuiU/" title="SEO 101: Are You Being Outranked by Your Own Content? by @dariozadro">SEO 101: Are You Being Outranked by Your Own Content? by @dariozadro</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mg-mk.com/en/seo-101-are-you-being-outranked-by-your-own-content-by-dariozadro/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The More the Pages, the Better the Ranking? Don’t Think So, and Here’s Why by @docmarkting</title>
		<link>http://mg-mk.com/en/the-more-the-pages-the-better-the-ranking-don%e2%80%99t-think-so-and-here%e2%80%99s-why-by-docmarkting/</link>
		<comments>http://mg-mk.com/en/the-more-the-pages-the-better-the-ranking-don%e2%80%99t-think-so-and-here%e2%80%99s-why-by-docmarkting/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Dec 2013 14:00:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[infographics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pagerank]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ranking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rankings]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mg-mk.com/en/the-more-the-pages-the-better-the-ranking-don%e2%80%99t-think-so-and-here%e2%80%99s-why-by-docmarkting/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ There is no clear-cut answer to this question. In a recent video, even Matt Cutts seemed quite vague. He reiterated, more times than necessary, that having a large website or a lot of web pages does not directly affect the PageRank]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> There is no clear-cut answer to this question. In a recent video, even Matt Cutts seemed quite vague. He reiterated, more times than necessary, that having a large website or a lot of web pages does not directly affect the PageRank</p>
<p>Read the rest here:<br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/SearchEngineJournal/~3/QOl7LcfJikc/" title="The More the Pages, the Better the Ranking? Don’t Think So, and Here’s Why by @docmarkting">The More the Pages, the Better the Ranking? Don’t Think So, and Here’s Why by @docmarkting</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mg-mk.com/en/the-more-the-pages-the-better-the-ranking-don%e2%80%99t-think-so-and-here%e2%80%99s-why-by-docmarkting/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How To Overcome Your Client’s Expectations Of Impossible Results</title>
		<link>http://mg-mk.com/en/how-to-overcome-your-client%e2%80%99s-expectations-of-impossible-results/</link>
		<comments>http://mg-mk.com/en/how-to-overcome-your-client%e2%80%99s-expectations-of-impossible-results/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Nov 2013 14:15:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[channel: seo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[client expectations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[client involvement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[geo-targeting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[leads growth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rankings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sales growth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[seo recommendations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[web marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[web presence]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mg-mk.com/en/how-to-overcome-your-client%e2%80%99s-expectations-of-impossible-results/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There isn&#8217;t much I dislike about Web marketing, but dealing with clients whose expectations don&#8217;t align with reality has to top the list. While many might gripe and complain that the client &#8220;just doesn&#8217;t get it&#8221; (often a true statement), the client&#8217;s absence of... Please visit Search Engine Land for the full article]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There isn&#8217;t much I dislike about Web marketing, but dealing with clients whose expectations don&#8217;t align with reality has to top the list. While many might gripe and complain that the client &#8220;just doesn&#8217;t get it&#8221; (often a true statement), the client&#8217;s absence of&#8230; Please visit Search Engine Land for the full article</p>
<p>Read this article:<br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://feeds.searchengineland.com/~r/searchengineland/~3/AhT99TYaPKM/how-to-overcome-your-clients-expectations-of-impossible-results-173696" title="How To Overcome Your Client’s Expectations Of Impossible Results">How To Overcome Your Client’s Expectations Of Impossible Results</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mg-mk.com/en/how-to-overcome-your-client%e2%80%99s-expectations-of-impossible-results/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bing SEO Ranking Factors 2013 Study By SearchMetrics</title>
		<link>http://mg-mk.com/en/bing-seo-ranking-factors-2013-study-by-searchmetrics/</link>
		<comments>http://mg-mk.com/en/bing-seo-ranking-factors-2013-study-by-searchmetrics/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Oct 2013 13:15:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bing seo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[channel: seo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microsoft bing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[microsoft: bing seo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rankings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[searchmetrics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mg-mk.com/en/bing-seo-ranking-factors-2013-study-by-searchmetrics/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Searchmetrics has released their SEO ranking factors for Bing, Microsoft&#8217;s search engine, today. Similar to their Google ranking factors, Searchmetrics analyzed 10,000 popular keywords and 300,000 websites appearing in the top 30 search results and looked at how various factors correlated... Please visit Search Engine Land for the full article. ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Searchmetrics has released their SEO ranking factors for Bing, Microsoft&#8217;s search engine, today. Similar to their Google ranking factors, Searchmetrics analyzed 10,000 popular keywords and 300,000 websites appearing in the top 30 search results and looked at how various factors correlated&#8230; Please visit Search Engine Land for the full article. </p>
<p>Visit link:<br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://feeds.searchengineland.com/~r/searchengineland/~3/CQuCkxi-UJY/bing-seo-ranking-factors-2013-study-by-searchmetrics-174121" title="Bing SEO Ranking Factors 2013 Study By SearchMetrics">Bing SEO Ranking Factors 2013 Study By SearchMetrics</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mg-mk.com/en/bing-seo-ranking-factors-2013-study-by-searchmetrics/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Study Shows No Clear Evidence That Google Plus Drives Ranking</title>
		<link>http://mg-mk.com/en/study-shows-no-clear-evidence-that-google-plus-drives-ranking/</link>
		<comments>http://mg-mk.com/en/study-shows-no-clear-evidence-that-google-plus-drives-ranking/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Sep 2013 13:00:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[all things seo column]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google plus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google rankings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google+ research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google+ shares]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google: +1]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google: seo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rankings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[seo: general]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mg-mk.com/en/study-shows-no-clear-evidence-that-google-plus-drives-ranking/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[At SMX Advanced, I presented results from a study we had done that convinced me that links in shares from Google Plus and Facebook behave like traditional web-based links. My statements at SMX Advanced were later disputed by Matt Cutts during his keynote interview by Danny Sullivan, leading to a... ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At SMX Advanced, I presented results from a study we had done that convinced me that links in shares from Google Plus and Facebook behave like traditional web-based links. My statements at SMX Advanced were later disputed by Matt Cutts during his keynote interview by Danny Sullivan, leading to a&#8230; </p>
<p>Follow this link:<br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://feeds.searchengineland.com/~r/searchengineland/~3/xcIYUcN2EIo/study-shows-no-clear-evidence-that-google-plus-drives-ranking-171789" title="Study Shows No Clear Evidence That Google Plus Drives Ranking">Study Shows No Clear Evidence That Google Plus Drives Ranking</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mg-mk.com/en/study-shows-no-clear-evidence-that-google-plus-drives-ranking/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google’s Matt Cutts: Once Again, +1s Have No Direct Impact On Rankings</title>
		<link>http://mg-mk.com/en/google%e2%80%99s-matt-cutts-once-again-1s-have-no-direct-impact-on-rankings/</link>
		<comments>http://mg-mk.com/en/google%e2%80%99s-matt-cutts-once-again-1s-have-no-direct-impact-on-rankings/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Aug 2013 18:58:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[channel: seo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google: seo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rankings]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mg-mk.com/en/google%e2%80%99s-matt-cutts-once-again-1s-have-no-direct-impact-on-rankings/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Google&#8217;s head of search spam, Matt Cutts, said once again that Google&#8217;s +1 data has no direct impact on their web search ranking algorithm. Moz published a story today named Amazing Correlation Between Google +1s and Higher Search Rankings in which Matt Cutts responded to in Hacker News... Please visit Search Engine Land for the full article]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google&#8217;s head of search spam, Matt Cutts, said once again that Google&#8217;s +1 data has no direct impact on their web search ranking algorithm. Moz published a story today named Amazing Correlation Between Google +1s and Higher Search Rankings in which Matt Cutts responded to in Hacker News&#8230; Please visit Search Engine Land for the full article</p>
<p>See the article here:<br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://feeds.searchengineland.com/~r/searchengineland/~3/rzSytLpXPBI/googles-matt-cutts-once-again-1s-have-no-direct-impact-on-rankings-170200" title="Google’s Matt Cutts: Once Again, +1s Have No Direct Impact On Rankings">Google’s Matt Cutts: Once Again, +1s Have No Direct Impact On Rankings</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mg-mk.com/en/google%e2%80%99s-matt-cutts-once-again-1s-have-no-direct-impact-on-rankings/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Slick New Overhaul Brings Rank Tracking Back To Raven Tools</title>
		<link>http://mg-mk.com/en/slick-new-overhaul-brings-rank-tracking-back-to-raven-tools/</link>
		<comments>http://mg-mk.com/en/slick-new-overhaul-brings-rank-tracking-back-to-raven-tools/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jul 2013 17:00:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[channel: analytics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[channel: sem]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[channel: seo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google: apis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rank tracking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rankings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[raven]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[raven tools]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[seo tools]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[webmaster-tools]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mg-mk.com/en/slick-new-overhaul-brings-rank-tracking-back-to-raven-tools/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Late last year, many Raven Tools users were surprised to find that Search Engine ranking data had been removed. Under pressure from Google, Raven yanked the SERP data and focused the tool on helping SEOs and Internet Marketers with analytics tools. ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Late last year, many Raven Tools users were surprised to find that Search Engine ranking data had been removed. Under pressure from Google, Raven yanked the SERP data and focused the tool on helping SEOs and Internet Marketers with analytics tools. </p>
<p>Go here to see the original:<br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://feeds.searchengineland.com/~r/searchengineland/~3/8SfpEuEKnRk/slick-new-overhaul-brings-rank-tracking-back-to-raven-tools-167731" title="Slick New Overhaul Brings Rank Tracking Back To Raven Tools">Slick New Overhaul Brings Rank Tracking Back To Raven Tools</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mg-mk.com/en/slick-new-overhaul-brings-rank-tracking-back-to-raven-tools/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Ultimate Guide to Rankings as a Reporting Metric</title>
		<link>http://mg-mk.com/en/the-ultimate-guide-to-rankings-as-a-reporting-metric/</link>
		<comments>http://mg-mk.com/en/the-ultimate-guide-to-rankings-as-a-reporting-metric/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Apr 2013 12:00:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[analytics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[kpi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rankings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reporting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search analytics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mg-mk.com/en/the-ultimate-guide-to-rankings-as-a-reporting-metric/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ One aspect of SEO reporting that’s relatively difficult for SEO professionals to explain to their clients is search engine rankings. Since rankings differ depending on myriad factors, a common question every SEO professional has heard countless times is “why do I see different rankings than what you’re reporting?” However, while top rankings have long been Author information Jayson DeMers Jayson DeMers is the founder &#038; CEO of AudienceBloom , a Seattle-based SEO agency, as well as Crackerize.com , a lyrics-humor website. You can contact him on LinkedIn , Google+ , or by email ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> One aspect of SEO reporting that’s relatively difficult for SEO professionals to explain to their clients is search engine rankings. Since rankings differ depending on myriad factors, a common question every SEO professional has heard countless times is “why do I see different rankings than what you’re reporting?” However, while top rankings have long been Author information Jayson DeMers Jayson DeMers is the founder &#038; CEO of AudienceBloom , a Seattle-based SEO agency, as well as Crackerize.com , a lyrics-humor website. You can contact him on LinkedIn , Google+ , or by email </p>
<p>View original post here:<br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/SearchEngineJournal/~3/SHYz6qQb1oo/" title="The Ultimate Guide to Rankings as a Reporting Metric">The Ultimate Guide to Rankings as a Reporting Metric</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mg-mk.com/en/the-ultimate-guide-to-rankings-as-a-reporting-metric/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google Explains Why Your New Page’s Number One Ranking May Drop</title>
		<link>http://mg-mk.com/en/google-explains-why-your-new-page%e2%80%99s-number-one-ranking-may-drop/</link>
		<comments>http://mg-mk.com/en/google-explains-why-your-new-page%e2%80%99s-number-one-ranking-may-drop/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Apr 2013 18:13:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google: seo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[matt cutts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[new page rankings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rankings]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mg-mk.com/en/google-explains-why-your-new-page%e2%80%99s-number-one-ranking-may-drop/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Google&#8217;s head of search spam, Matt Cutts posted a video explaining why it is not uncommon to see a new page rank very well in Google early on, and then, that ranking declines over time. Matt explains that sometimes, Google has a hard time figuring out the original source of a new piece of... Please visit Search Engine Land for the full article. ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google&#8217;s head of search spam, Matt Cutts posted a video explaining why it is not uncommon to see a new page rank very well in Google early on, and then, that ranking declines over time. Matt explains that sometimes, Google has a hard time figuring out the original source of a new piece of&#8230; Please visit Search Engine Land for the full article. </p>
<p>See the original post:<br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://feeds.searchengineland.com/~r/searchengineland/~3/EfMyRf39UOQ/google-explains-why-your-new-pages-number-one-ranking-may-drop-154852" title="Google Explains Why Your New Page’s Number One Ranking May Drop">Google Explains Why Your New Page’s Number One Ranking May Drop</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mg-mk.com/en/google-explains-why-your-new-page%e2%80%99s-number-one-ranking-may-drop/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How To Stop The Panic Before Asking “Have I Been Panda Slapped?”</title>
		<link>http://mg-mk.com/en/how-to-stop-the-panic-before-asking-%e2%80%9chave-i-been-panda-slapped%e2%80%9d/</link>
		<comments>http://mg-mk.com/en/how-to-stop-the-panic-before-asking-%e2%80%9chave-i-been-panda-slapped%e2%80%9d/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2013 20:17:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[algorithmic updates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google: panda update]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google: seo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[panda myths]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[panda update must-reads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[panda update tips]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[panda updates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rankings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[seo: duplicate content]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mg-mk.com/en/how-to-stop-the-panic-before-asking-%e2%80%9chave-i-been-panda-slapped%e2%80%9d/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You may see a drop in rankings or traffic and immediately panic. Have I been Panda-slapped]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You may see a drop in rankings or traffic and immediately panic. Have I been Panda-slapped</p>
<p>Read more:<br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://feeds.searchengineland.com/~r/searchengineland/~3/1UgqzT5-yGc/how-to-stop-the-panic-before-asking-have-i-been-panda-slapped-149034" title="How To Stop The Panic Before Asking “Have I Been Panda Slapped?”">How To Stop The Panic Before Asking “Have I Been Panda Slapped?”</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mg-mk.com/en/how-to-stop-the-panic-before-asking-%e2%80%9chave-i-been-panda-slapped%e2%80%9d/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
