<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>MG Marketing &#187; search algorithm</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mg-mk.com/en/tag/search-algorithm/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mg-mk.com/en</link>
	<description>Online Marketing Agency</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2026 22:10:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>With Relevancy Totally Irrelevant to Its Success: What is Google?</title>
		<link>http://mg-mk.com/en/with-relevancy-totally-irrelevant-to-its-success-what-is-google/</link>
		<comments>http://mg-mk.com/en/with-relevancy-totally-irrelevant-to-its-success-what-is-google/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Dec 2012 13:14:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[human search]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search algorithm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search engines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[semantic search]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[semantic web]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[suggestive search]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mg-mk.com/en/with-relevancy-totally-irrelevant-to-its-success-what-is-google/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ I am writing this article in response to the recently posted&#8220;Google Quality Rater Guidelines 2012&#8243; document, seemingly leaked, speculatively injected into the market. Before I dissect the specimen, let me start with a general Google overview first.  For all practical, technical, scientific, and artistic purposes, Google is not a search engine, at least not for me. The post With Relevancy Totally Irrelevant to Its Success: What is Google? ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> I am writing this article in response to the recently posted&#8220;Google Quality Rater Guidelines 2012&#8243; document, seemingly leaked, speculatively injected into the market. Before I dissect the specimen, let me start with a general Google overview first.  For all practical, technical, scientific, and artistic purposes, Google is not a search engine, at least not for me. The post With Relevancy Totally Irrelevant to Its Success: What is Google? </p>
<p>Read the original:<br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/SearchEngineJournal/~3/29-mtcn_bF4/" title="With Relevancy Totally Irrelevant to Its Success: What is Google?">With Relevancy Totally Irrelevant to Its Success: What is Google?</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mg-mk.com/en/with-relevancy-totally-irrelevant-to-its-success-what-is-google/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
