<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>MG Marketing &#187; search behavior</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mg-mk.com/en/tag/search-behavior/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mg-mk.com/en</link>
	<description>Online Marketing Agency</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2026 13:30:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>What Are The Value of Images on Google? Insights on Image Search Behavior by @VogelLara</title>
		<link>http://mg-mk.com/en/what-are-the-value-of-images-on-google-insights-on-image-search-behavior-by-vogellara/</link>
		<comments>http://mg-mk.com/en/what-are-the-value-of-images-on-google-insights-on-image-search-behavior-by-vogellara/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2014 13:32:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google: images]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[image seo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[infographics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search behavior]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[visual content]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mg-mk.com/en/what-are-the-value-of-images-on-google-insights-on-image-search-behavior-by-vogellara/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ Did you know 90% of information transmitted to the brain is visual? The brain also process visuals 60,000 times faster than text and studies have shown 40% of people respond better to images than plain text. It is clear that people respond to images. ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> Did you know 90% of information transmitted to the brain is visual? The brain also process visuals 60,000 times faster than text and studies have shown 40% of people respond better to images than plain text. It is clear that people respond to images. </p>
<p>Read more:<br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/SearchEngineJournal/~3/xaiOiSvstqg/" title="What Are The Value of Images on Google? Insights on Image Search Behavior by @VogelLara">What Are The Value of Images on Google? Insights on Image Search Behavior by @VogelLara</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mg-mk.com/en/what-are-the-value-of-images-on-google-insights-on-image-search-behavior-by-vogellara/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Super Bowl 2014: How We Searched</title>
		<link>http://mg-mk.com/en/super-bowl-2014-how-we-searched/</link>
		<comments>http://mg-mk.com/en/super-bowl-2014-how-we-searched/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Feb 2014 16:23:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[channel: seo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[features: analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search & society]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search behavior]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[super bows searches]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[top news]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mg-mk.com/en/super-bowl-2014-how-we-searched/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I know, I know. Kids today are all about the hashtags and the Twitters; but it turns out, we&#8217;re pretty good multi-taskers and are still really into searching, too. As has been the case all six years I&#8217;ve been looking at how the Super Bowl impacts how we search, we use Google (and Bing... ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I know, I know. Kids today are all about the hashtags and the Twitters; but it turns out, we&#8217;re pretty good multi-taskers and are still really into searching, too. As has been the case all six years I&#8217;ve been looking at how the Super Bowl impacts how we search, we use Google (and Bing&#8230; </p>
<p>Read the original:<br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://feeds.searchengineland.com/~r/searchengineland/~3/fhOtTRzIwJ4/super-bowl-2014-search-183176" title="Super Bowl 2014: How We Searched">Super Bowl 2014: How We Searched</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mg-mk.com/en/super-bowl-2014-how-we-searched/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>One Out Of Five “Second Screeners” Look Up Advertised Product Info While Watching TV</title>
		<link>http://mg-mk.com/en/one-out-of-five-%e2%80%9csecond-screeners%e2%80%9d-look-up-advertised-product-info-while-watching-tv/</link>
		<comments>http://mg-mk.com/en/one-out-of-five-%e2%80%9csecond-screeners%e2%80%9d-look-up-advertised-product-info-while-watching-tv/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Apr 2013 20:13:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search behavior]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[second screens]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tablet search]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mg-mk.com/en/one-out-of-five-%e2%80%9csecond-screeners%e2%80%9d-look-up-advertised-product-info-while-watching-tv/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mg-mk.com/en/one-out-of-five-%e2%80%9csecond-screeners%e2%80%9d-look-up-advertised-product-info-while-watching-tv/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
