<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>MG Marketing &#187; spam</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mg-mk.com/en/tag/spam/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mg-mk.com/en</link>
	<description>Online Marketing Agency</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2026 09:47:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Wharton Professor, Ethan Mollick, On The Decay Of Internet Search</title>
		<link>http://mg-mk.com/en/wharton-professor-ethan-mollick-on-the-decay-of-internet-search/</link>
		<comments>http://mg-mk.com/en/wharton-professor-ethan-mollick-on-the-decay-of-internet-search/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jan 2024 07:51:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[spam]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mg-mk.com/en/wharton-professor-ethan-mollick-on-the-decay-of-internet-search/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ethan Mollick, an Associate Professor at The Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania, posted on X about his disappointment with overall internet search. ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ethan Mollick, an Associate Professor at The Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania, posted on X about his disappointment with overall internet search. </p>
</p>
<p>Read the original post:<br />
<a target="_blank" href="https://www.seroundtable.com/wharton-professor-decay-of-internet-search-36641.html" title="Wharton Professor, Ethan Mollick, On The Decay Of Internet Search">Wharton Professor, Ethan Mollick, On The Decay Of Internet Search</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mg-mk.com/en/wharton-professor-ethan-mollick-on-the-decay-of-internet-search/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Is Google Spam-Free? A Case Study on Spam in SERPs by @cognitiveSEO</title>
		<link>http://mg-mk.com/en/is-google-spam-free-a-case-study-on-spam-in-serps-by-cognitiveseo/</link>
		<comments>http://mg-mk.com/en/is-google-spam-free-a-case-study-on-spam-in-serps-by-cognitiveseo/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2014 14:31:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google update]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[serps]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[spam]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mg-mk.com/en/is-google-spam-free-a-case-study-on-spam-in-serps-by-cognitiveseo/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ No longer than one year ago, on June 11th 2013, Google, launched a new algorithm whose main purpose was to clean some very “shady” niches, such as “payday loans” or “buy Viagra”. ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> No longer than one year ago, on June 11th 2013, Google, launched a new algorithm whose main purpose was to clean some very “shady” niches, such as “payday loans” or “buy Viagra”. </p>
<p>View post:<br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/SearchEngineJournal/~3/Q1Pt7jx-UD0/" title="Is Google Spam-Free? A Case Study on Spam in SERPs by @cognitiveSEO">Is Google Spam-Free? A Case Study on Spam in SERPs by @cognitiveSEO</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mg-mk.com/en/is-google-spam-free-a-case-study-on-spam-in-serps-by-cognitiveseo/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Someone Outranking You With Your Own Content? Use The New Google Scraper Report</title>
		<link>http://mg-mk.com/en/someone-outranking-you-with-your-own-content-use-the-new-google-scraper-report/</link>
		<comments>http://mg-mk.com/en/someone-outranking-you-with-your-own-content-use-the-new-google-scraper-report/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Feb 2014 19:58:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[channel: seo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google: seo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[matt cutts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scraping]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[seo: duplicate content]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[seo: spamming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[spam]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[top news]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mg-mk.com/en/someone-outranking-you-with-your-own-content-use-the-new-google-scraper-report/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[One of the most frustrating experiences for any publisher is discovering that someone not only has copied your content but outranks you on Google for searches related to that content. Now, Google seems to have heard the complaints and has launched a tool to help. Called the Google Scraper Report,... ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One of the most frustrating experiences for any publisher is discovering that someone not only has copied your content but outranks you on Google for searches related to that content. Now, Google seems to have heard the complaints and has launched a tool to help. Called the Google Scraper Report,&#8230; </p>
<p>See the rest here:<br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://feeds.searchengineland.com/~r/searchengineland/~3/KTwR5NmW7GM/google-scraper-tool-185532" title="Someone Outranking You With Your Own Content? Use The New Google Scraper Report">Someone Outranking You With Your Own Content? Use The New Google Scraper Report</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mg-mk.com/en/someone-outranking-you-with-your-own-content-use-the-new-google-scraper-report/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Matt Cutts At Pubcon 2013: Moonshots, Machine Learning &amp; The Future Of Google Search</title>
		<link>http://mg-mk.com/en/matt-cutts-at-pubcon-2013-moonshots-machine-learning-the-future-of-google-search/</link>
		<comments>http://mg-mk.com/en/matt-cutts-at-pubcon-2013-moonshots-machine-learning-the-future-of-google-search/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Oct 2013 17:05:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[channel: seo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cutts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[goog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google: general]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[keynote]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[matt cutts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pubcon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[spam]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[top news]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mg-mk.com/en/matt-cutts-at-pubcon-2013-moonshots-machine-learning-the-future-of-google-search/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This morning Matt Cutts, head of Google&#8217;s webspam team, gave a keynote speech at Pubcon in Las Vegas. The keynote comes on the heels of a scathing day 1 keynote from Jason Calacanis who said that Google rules everything, that they were essentially evil. ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This morning Matt Cutts, head of Google&#8217;s webspam team, gave a keynote speech at Pubcon in Las Vegas. The keynote comes on the heels of a scathing day 1 keynote from Jason Calacanis who said that Google rules everything, that they were essentially evil. </p>
<p>Originally posted here:<br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://feeds.searchengineland.com/~r/searchengineland/~3/kOToL0y8zeg/matt-cutts-at-pubcon-174906" title="Matt Cutts At Pubcon 2013: Moonshots, Machine Learning &amp; The Future Of Google Search">Matt Cutts At Pubcon 2013: Moonshots, Machine Learning &amp; The Future Of Google Search</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mg-mk.com/en/matt-cutts-at-pubcon-2013-moonshots-machine-learning-the-future-of-google-search/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Structured Data Brouhaha At SMX East: Clarifying Contentious Issues</title>
		<link>http://mg-mk.com/en/the-structured-data-brouhaha-at-smx-east-clarifying-contentious-issues/</link>
		<comments>http://mg-mk.com/en/the-structured-data-brouhaha-at-smx-east-clarifying-contentious-issues/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Oct 2013 13:01:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google: seo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[local search column]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[local seo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[logo optimization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[logos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ratings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rich snippets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[schema]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[schema.org]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[semantic markup]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[seo: spamming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[spam]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[structured data]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[testimonials]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mg-mk.com/en/the-structured-data-brouhaha-at-smx-east-clarifying-contentious-issues/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If you attended the Structured Data Superstars session at SMX East earlier this month, you probably witnessed a very brief interchange between myself and Googler Pierre Far at the end of the session. Pierre woke everyone up by stating that some of the semantic markup recommendations I&#8217;d... Please visit Search Engine Land for the full article. ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you attended the Structured Data Superstars session at SMX East earlier this month, you probably witnessed a very brief interchange between myself and Googler Pierre Far at the end of the session. Pierre woke everyone up by stating that some of the semantic markup recommendations I&#8217;d&#8230; Please visit Search Engine Land for the full article. </p>
<p>Read the original here:<br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://feeds.searchengineland.com/~r/searchengineland/~3/fWGXJdEeDoQ/the-structured-data-bruhaha-at-smx-east-174142" title="The Structured Data Brouhaha At SMX East: Clarifying Contentious Issues">The Structured Data Brouhaha At SMX East: Clarifying Contentious Issues</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mg-mk.com/en/the-structured-data-brouhaha-at-smx-east-clarifying-contentious-issues/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google May Have Penalized Another Major Link Network: Ghost Rank 2.0</title>
		<link>http://mg-mk.com/en/google-may-have-penalized-another-major-link-network-ghost-rank-2-0/</link>
		<comments>http://mg-mk.com/en/google-may-have-penalized-another-major-link-network-ghost-rank-2-0/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Sep 2013 13:41:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[channel: seo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ghost rank]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google: seo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[link building: general]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[link network]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[links]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[seo: spamming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[spam]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[top news]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mg-mk.com/en/google-may-have-penalized-another-major-link-network-ghost-rank-2-0/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Google has significantly penalized another underground link network over the weekend and we believe that one of the link networks targeted by Google is named Ghost Rank 2.0. A few weeks ago, Matt Cutts, Google&#8217;s head of search spam, tweeted &#8220;Thinking of ghost-related puns for a spam..]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google has significantly penalized another underground link network over the weekend and we believe that one of the link networks targeted by Google is named Ghost Rank 2.0. A few weeks ago, Matt Cutts, Google&#8217;s head of search spam, tweeted &#8220;Thinking of ghost-related puns for a spam..</p>
<p>Link:<br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://feeds.searchengineland.com/~r/searchengineland/~3/FGeY3K8kLq8/google-may-have-penalized-another-major-link-network-ghost-rank-2-0-172567" title="Google May Have Penalized Another Major Link Network: Ghost Rank 2.0">Google May Have Penalized Another Major Link Network: Ghost Rank 2.0</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mg-mk.com/en/google-may-have-penalized-another-major-link-network-ghost-rank-2-0/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google’s Matt Cutts: Spammers Rarely Spam Using Multiple ccTLDs</title>
		<link>http://mg-mk.com/en/google%e2%80%99s-matt-cutts-spammers-rarely-spam-using-multiple-cctlds/</link>
		<comments>http://mg-mk.com/en/google%e2%80%99s-matt-cutts-spammers-rarely-spam-using-multiple-cctlds/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Sep 2013 17:57:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[channel: seo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google: seo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[matt cutts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[seo: spamming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[spam]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mg-mk.com/en/google%e2%80%99s-matt-cutts-spammers-rarely-spam-using-multiple-cctlds/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In a recent video answer by Google&#8217;s head of search spam, Matt Cutts, Google said that spammers rarely use multiple or mass number of ccTLDs in an effort to spam. This comment came from Matt Cutts when he answered a question on if it is duplicate content to have the same content on an IPv4... Please visit Search Engine Land for the full article]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In a recent video answer by Google&#8217;s head of search spam, Matt Cutts, Google said that spammers rarely use multiple or mass number of ccTLDs in an effort to spam. This comment came from Matt Cutts when he answered a question on if it is duplicate content to have the same content on an IPv4&#8230; Please visit Search Engine Land for the full article</p>
<p>Continued here:<br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://feeds.searchengineland.com/~r/searchengineland/~3/-Po7PGAcXz4/googles-matt-cutts-spammers-rarely-spam-using-multiple-cctlds-171874" title="Google’s Matt Cutts: Spammers Rarely Spam Using Multiple ccTLDs">Google’s Matt Cutts: Spammers Rarely Spam Using Multiple ccTLDs</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mg-mk.com/en/google%e2%80%99s-matt-cutts-spammers-rarely-spam-using-multiple-cctlds/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google’s Matt Cutts Further Explains Automation of Reconsideration Request Process by @wonderwall7</title>
		<link>http://mg-mk.com/en/google%e2%80%99s-matt-cutts-further-explains-automation-of-reconsideration-request-process-by-wonderwall7/</link>
		<comments>http://mg-mk.com/en/google%e2%80%99s-matt-cutts-further-explains-automation-of-reconsideration-request-process-by-wonderwall7/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Aug 2013 15:49:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[matt cutts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reconsideration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[spam]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[web spam]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[webmaster-tools]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mg-mk.com/en/google%e2%80%99s-matt-cutts-further-explains-automation-of-reconsideration-request-process-by-wonderwall7/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ In the latest video from YouTube&#8217;s Google Webmaster Help channel, Matt Cutts explains why the Google Spam team can&#8217;t handle every individual reconsideration request with a personal response: The video came from a sent-in question, asking why his thoughtful, well-written requests were always followed up by automatic responses from Google. ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> In the latest video from YouTube&#8217;s Google Webmaster Help channel, Matt Cutts explains why the Google Spam team can&#8217;t handle every individual reconsideration request with a personal response: The video came from a sent-in question, asking why his thoughtful, well-written requests were always followed up by automatic responses from Google. </p>
<p><img src="http://mg-mk.com/en/wp-content/uploads/a28a4e045700x300.jpg-150x150.jpg" /></p>
<p>Link:<br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/SearchEngineJournal/~3/a_s_BKa1Wtw/" title="Google’s Matt Cutts Further Explains Automation of Reconsideration Request Process by @wonderwall7">Google’s Matt Cutts Further Explains Automation of Reconsideration Request Process by @wonderwall7</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mg-mk.com/en/google%e2%80%99s-matt-cutts-further-explains-automation-of-reconsideration-request-process-by-wonderwall7/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google Says “Snag” Has Taken Manual Spam Actions Viewer Offline</title>
		<link>http://mg-mk.com/en/google-says-%e2%80%9csnag%e2%80%9d-has-taken-manual-spam-actions-viewer-offline/</link>
		<comments>http://mg-mk.com/en/google-says-%e2%80%9csnag%e2%80%9d-has-taken-manual-spam-actions-viewer-offline/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Aug 2013 21:01:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[channel: seo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google webmaster tools]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[spam]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[top news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[webspam]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mg-mk.com/en/google-says-%e2%80%9csnag%e2%80%9d-has-taken-manual-spam-actions-viewer-offline/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If you&#8217;re not seeing the &#8220;Manual Actions&#8221; feature in Google Webmaster Tools, you&#8217;re not alone. Many webmasters have taken to Twitter and other social networks to say that the link has been removed from their accounts, and Google has updated its original announcement to say..]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you&#8217;re not seeing the &#8220;Manual Actions&#8221; feature in Google Webmaster Tools, you&#8217;re not alone. Many webmasters have taken to Twitter and other social networks to say that the link has been removed from their accounts, and Google has updated its original announcement to say..</p>
<p>Excerpt from:<br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://feeds.searchengineland.com/~r/searchengineland/~3/d75hWjFXSoI/google-says-snag-has-taken-manual-spam-actions-viewer-offline-169396" title="Google Says “Snag” Has Taken Manual Spam Actions Viewer Offline">Google Says “Snag” Has Taken Manual Spam Actions Viewer Offline</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mg-mk.com/en/google-says-%e2%80%9csnag%e2%80%9d-has-taken-manual-spam-actions-viewer-offline/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google Releases Seven Videos On Typical Manual Spam Actions</title>
		<link>http://mg-mk.com/en/google-releases-seven-videos-on-typical-manual-spam-actions/</link>
		<comments>http://mg-mk.com/en/google-releases-seven-videos-on-typical-manual-spam-actions/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Aug 2013 21:58:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[channel: seo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google: seo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[manual penalty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[spam]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[top news]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mg-mk.com/en/google-releases-seven-videos-on-typical-manual-spam-actions/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Earlier today, Google launched manual spam actions to Google Webmaster Tools where you can see if your site currently has a manual spam action. To help those who have received some of these manual action notifications, Google created seven videos for the most common manual action notifications. ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Earlier today, Google launched manual spam actions to Google Webmaster Tools where you can see if your site currently has a manual spam action. To help those who have received some of these manual action notifications, Google created seven videos for the most common manual action notifications. </p>
<p>Here is the original post:<br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://feeds.searchengineland.com/~r/searchengineland/~3/T65w6JTNRLg/google-releases-six-videos-on-typical-manual-spam-actions-169226" title="Google Releases Seven Videos On Typical Manual Spam Actions">Google Releases Seven Videos On Typical Manual Spam Actions</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mg-mk.com/en/google-releases-seven-videos-on-typical-manual-spam-actions/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
