<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>MG Marketing &#187; web content writing</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mg-mk.com/en/tag/web-content-writing/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mg-mk.com/en</link>
	<description>Online Marketing Agency</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2026 22:10:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Readability versus The Robot: The Flesch Reading Test by @hhartzenberg</title>
		<link>http://mg-mk.com/en/readability-versus-the-robot-the-flesch-reading-test-by-hhartzenberg/</link>
		<comments>http://mg-mk.com/en/readability-versus-the-robot-the-flesch-reading-test-by-hhartzenberg/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jan 2014 12:00:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[content marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search engines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[seo copywriting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[web content writing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mg-mk.com/en/readability-versus-the-robot-the-flesch-reading-test-by-hhartzenberg/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ I first came across the Flesch Reading Ease Test thanks to a combination of pride and annoyance. Messing around with Yoast’s WordPress plugin, I was confronted by the following message: “The copy scores 68.9 in the Flesch Reading Ease test, which is considered OK to read.” &#8220;OK to read?&#8221; I thought, &#8220;How dare you?&#8221; So, [&#8230;] Author information Holly Hartzenberg Co-Founder at To Your Heart's Content Holly is the co-founder of To Your Heart's Content, a team of slicker-than-your-average digital copywriters]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> I first came across the Flesch Reading Ease Test thanks to a combination of pride and annoyance. Messing around with Yoast’s WordPress plugin, I was confronted by the following message: “The copy scores 68.9 in the Flesch Reading Ease test, which is considered OK to read.” &#8220;OK to read?&#8221; I thought, &#8220;How dare you?&#8221; So, [&#8230;] Author information Holly Hartzenberg Co-Founder at To Your Heart&#8217;s Content Holly is the co-founder of To Your Heart&#8217;s Content, a team of slicker-than-your-average digital copywriters</p>
<p>More here:<br />
<a target="_blank" href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/SearchEngineJournal/~3/JY5Q1T0MMfc/" title="Readability versus The Robot: The Flesch Reading Test by @hhartzenberg">Readability versus The Robot: The Flesch Reading Test by @hhartzenberg</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mg-mk.com/en/readability-versus-the-robot-the-flesch-reading-test-by-hhartzenberg/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
