<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Music Gear Forums &#187; been-tracking</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mg-mk.com/forums/tag/been-tracking/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mg-mk.com/forums</link>
	<description>Check all music gear forums at once glance</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 28 Jun 2011 12:53:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Is recording higher than 44.1/16 bit really worth it?</title>
		<link>http://mg-mk.com/forums/is-recording-higher-than-44-116-bit-really-worth-it/</link>
		<comments>http://mg-mk.com/forums/is-recording-higher-than-44-116-bit-really-worth-it/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 May 2010 17:05:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Recording]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[been-tracking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wind]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mg-mk.com/forums/is-recording-higher-than-44-116-bit-really-worth-it/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ Just curious. Ive been tracking at 48/24 , but I wonder if Im pissing in the wind. How do you record? ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> Just curious. Ive been tracking at 48/24 , but I wonder if Im pissing in the wind. How do you record? </p>
<p>By <i>RedhouseNorton</i> (Gearslutz.com)</p>
<p><a target="_blank" href="http://www.gearslutz.com/board/so-much-gear-so-little-time/490518-recording-higher-than-44-1-16-bit-really-worth.html" title="Is recording higher than 44.1/16 bit really worth it?">Read more</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mg-mk.com/forums/is-recording-higher-than-44-116-bit-really-worth-it/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Is recording higher than 44.1/16 bit really worth it?</title>
		<link>http://mg-mk.com/forums/is-recording-higher-than-44-116-bit-really-worth-it-2/</link>
		<comments>http://mg-mk.com/forums/is-recording-higher-than-44-116-bit-really-worth-it-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 May 2010 17:05:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Recording]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[been-tracking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wind]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mg-mk.com/forums/is-recording-higher-than-44-116-bit-really-worth-it-2/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ Just curious. Ive been tracking at 48/24 , but I wonder if Im pissing in the wind. ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> Just curious. Ive been tracking at 48/24 , but I wonder if Im pissing in the wind. </p>
<p>By <i>RedhouseNorton</i> (Gearslutz.com)</p>
<p><a target="_blank" href="http://www.gearslutz.com/board/so-much-gear-so-little-time/490518-recording-higher-than-44-1-16-bit-really-worth.html" title="Is recording higher than 44.1/16 bit really worth it?">Read more</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mg-mk.com/forums/is-recording-higher-than-44-116-bit-really-worth-it-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
