<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Music Gear Forums &#187; projects</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mg-mk.com/forums/tag/projects/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mg-mk.com/forums</link>
	<description>Check all music gear forums at once glance</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 28 Jun 2011 12:53:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Alesis blackface at 44.1</title>
		<link>http://mg-mk.com/forums/alesis-blackface-at-44-1/</link>
		<comments>http://mg-mk.com/forums/alesis-blackface-at-44-1/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 May 2010 02:54:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Recording]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[adat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[audio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blackface]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[connect-extra]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digi002]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[low end theory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[machine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[plug-the-out]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[projects]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[will-it-work]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[works-at-48khz]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mg-mk.com/forums/alesis-blackface-at-44-1/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ Hi everyone! I'm about to buy an Adat machine Alesis blackface for 65£. I want to use it to connect extra channels throught the adat port of my digi002. ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> Hi everyone! I&#8217;m about to buy an Adat machine Alesis blackface for 65£. I want to use it to connect extra channels throught the adat port of my digi002. </p>
<p>By <i>ayskura</i> (Gearslutz.com)</p>
<p><a target="_blank" href="http://www.gearslutz.com/board/low-end-theory/491792-alesis-blackface-44-1-a.html" title="Alesis blackface at 44.1">Read more</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mg-mk.com/forums/alesis-blackface-at-44-1/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>003+ rack not supporting 96/24bit?</title>
		<link>http://mg-mk.com/forums/003-rack-not-supporting-9624bit/</link>
		<comments>http://mg-mk.com/forums/003-rack-not-supporting-9624bit/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 May 2010 23:48:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Guitar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Recording]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[apogee-rosetta]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[distorted]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[from-throwing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[projects]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[speakers-work]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[switched-cables]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[thought-it-may]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[truck-before]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[warehouse-guy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[week-concerning]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mg-mk.com/forums/003-rack-not-supporting-9624bit/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ I created a thread last week concerning my Apogee Rosetta 800 converter. I thought it may have been busted because my distorted guitars were coming through extremely digital sounding... utter CRAP! I experimented around and bypassed all my pres and apogee converter all together and went DI into the 003+. ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> I created a thread last week concerning my Apogee Rosetta 800 converter. I thought it may have been busted because my distorted guitars were coming through extremely digital sounding&#8230; utter CRAP! I experimented around and bypassed all my pres and apogee converter all together and went DI into the 003+. </p>
<p>By <i>knucklesmd</i> (Gearslutz.com)</p>
<p><a target="_blank" href="http://www.gearslutz.com/board/so-much-gear-so-little-time/491182-003-rack-not-supporting-96-24bit.html" title="003+ rack not supporting 96/24bit?">Read more</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mg-mk.com/forums/003-rack-not-supporting-9624bit/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Logic 9 at 48khz, pros and cons?</title>
		<link>http://mg-mk.com/forums/logic-9-at-48khz-pros-and-cons/</link>
		<comments>http://mg-mk.com/forums/logic-9-at-48khz-pros-and-cons/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 May 2010 16:23:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Recording]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[44-1khz-theres]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[48khz-projects]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[apogee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[apogee-duet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[better-at-48khz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[call-it-silent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[headphone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hiss-at-48khz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[impact-on-how]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[interface]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[logic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[music computers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[project]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[project-whats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[projects]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mg-mk.com/forums/logic-9-at-48khz-pros-and-cons/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ Hi guys, Right ive found an annoying bug with my Apogee Duet (that I suspect everyone else has even if they haven't noticed yet unless new models fix it) At 44.1khz theres an unreasonable amount of hiss at 48khz its reduced dramatically (although I still wouldn't call it silent) unfortunately this happens both in the headphone port and on the master outs and is picked up very easily by my Adam A7X's. Im obviously really disappointed with this, and I didn't envisage using 48khz on my projects, I dont believe it would improve anything and I dont really want to waste the extra CPU cycles to do everything at 48khz. But if this hiss annoys me as much as it is, I dont have much choice in reducing it (bar getting another interface) So if I switch to 48khz projects how much impact will this have on my CPU (in percentage?) Also my entire sample library (which is huge) is at 44.1khz]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> Hi guys, Right ive found an annoying bug with my Apogee Duet (that I suspect everyone else has even if they haven&#8217;t noticed yet unless new models fix it) At 44.1khz theres an unreasonable amount of hiss at 48khz its reduced dramatically (although I still wouldn&#8217;t call it silent) unfortunately this happens both in the headphone port and on the master outs and is picked up very easily by my Adam A7X&#8217;s. Im obviously really disappointed with this, and I didn&#8217;t envisage using 48khz on my projects, I dont believe it would improve anything and I dont really want to waste the extra CPU cycles to do everything at 48khz. But if this hiss annoys me as much as it is, I dont have much choice in reducing it (bar getting another interface) So if I switch to 48khz projects how much impact will this have on my CPU (in percentage?) Also my entire sample library (which is huge) is at 44.1khz</p>
<p>By <i>dannys1</i> (Gearslutz.com)</p>
<p><a target="_blank" href="http://www.gearslutz.com/board/music-computers/491096-logic-9-48khz-pros-cons.html" title="Logic 9 at 48khz, pros and cons?">Read more</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mg-mk.com/forums/logic-9-at-48khz-pros-and-cons/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Cubase 5 Crashes When Opening Particular Project</title>
		<link>http://mg-mk.com/forums/cubase-5-crashes-when-opening-particular-project/</link>
		<comments>http://mg-mk.com/forums/cubase-5-crashes-when-opening-particular-project/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 May 2010 18:20:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Recording]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cubase]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[issue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[music computers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[one-loads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[other-projects]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[projects]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[separate-files]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[very-large]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[works-fine]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mg-mk.com/forums/cubase-5-crashes-when-opening-particular-project/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ Man, I love Cubase 5...but I don't love this issue. One very large file that I have not yet exported as separate files is now unopenable. All other projects are fine, but this one loads up, and then promptly crashes--Cubase just disappears...no icon visible, no warning]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> Man, I love Cubase 5&#8230;but I don&#8217;t love this issue. One very large file that I have not yet exported as separate files is now unopenable. All other projects are fine, but this one loads up, and then promptly crashes&#8211;Cubase just disappears&#8230;no icon visible, no warning</p>
<p>By <i>Mark Kaufman</i> (Gearslutz.com)</p>
<p><a target="_blank" href="http://www.gearslutz.com/board/music-computers/490895-cubase-5-crashes-when-opening-particular-project.html" title="Cubase 5 Crashes When Opening Particular Project">Read more</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mg-mk.com/forums/cubase-5-crashes-when-opening-particular-project/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sound Design Delivery Question?</title>
		<link>http://mg-mk.com/forums/sound-design-delivery-question/</link>
		<comments>http://mg-mk.com/forums/sound-design-delivery-question/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 May 2010 02:23:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Recording]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[experience]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[experience-goes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[final]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[genereal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[make-it-sound]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[more-towards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[premix-the-hell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[projects]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[seasoned-sound]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[session]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the-final]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[your-projects]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[your-session]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mg-mk.com/forums/sound-design-delivery-question/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ So I've got a question for all you seasoned sound designers. How do you deliver, or how do you expect work to be delivered to the final mixer? I find there seems to be a gray area as far as my experience goes, as to whether I need to do more towards the final project's mix goal. ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> So I&#8217;ve got a question for all you seasoned sound designers. How do you deliver, or how do you expect work to be delivered to the final mixer? I find there seems to be a gray area as far as my experience goes, as to whether I need to do more towards the final project&#8217;s mix goal. </p>
<p>By <i>Slutpuppy</i> (Gearslutz.com)</p>
<p><a target="_blank" href="http://www.gearslutz.com/board/post-production-forum/490691-sound-design-delivery-question.html" title="Sound Design Delivery Question?">Read more</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mg-mk.com/forums/sound-design-delivery-question/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>In praise of the AT4033</title>
		<link>http://mg-mk.com/forums/in-praise-of-the-at4033/</link>
		<comments>http://mg-mk.com/forums/in-praise-of-the-at4033/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 May 2010 14:03:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Recording]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bedroom-studio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[everything-over]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[less-detailed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lowly]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[neumann]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[over-the-years]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pair]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[projects]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[spent-on-new]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[takes-lead]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the-best]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vocal-duty]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[years]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mg-mk.com/forums/?p=110</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ I saw that Alan Parsons gives a shout out to the lowly AT4033. I second! This mic's a real sleeper. Versatile-- I've used my pair for everything over the years-- and it takes lead vocal duty over my U87 for at least half my projects]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> I saw that Alan Parsons gives a shout out to the lowly AT4033. I second! This mic&#8217;s a real sleeper. Versatile&#8211; I&#8217;ve used my pair for everything over the years&#8211; and it takes lead vocal duty over my U87 for at least half my projects</p>
<p>By <i>Shiny Beast</i> (Gearslutz.com)</p>
<p><a target="_blank" href="http://www.gearslutz.com/board/so-much-gear-so-little-time/490467-praise-at4033.html" title="In praise of the AT4033">Read more</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mg-mk.com/forums/in-praise-of-the-at4033/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
